Preview

Ideal Ruler In Shakespeare's Henry V

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ideal Ruler In Shakespeare's Henry V
Henry V, the story of an idolised king in England who had defeated most odds was written by the legendary poet and playwright, William Shakespeare. Shakespeare had previously written about Henry V, yet had based it on his reckless and careless youth. In this play however, he portrays the growth of Henry to become the ideal ruler for England; viewing it by speaking of Henry’s plan to invade and rule France. This essay will further discuss Henry’s character in act 1.

Henry V is found to be compared to his old self in Act 1, “the courses of his youth promised it not.” This example was said by a Canterbury, a bishop, who admits his concern for England during Henry’s youth. He, as many others, believed that Henry’s wild acts had convinced them that he would not be a suitable king, viewing Henry as an immature figure, with no ruling technique whatsoever. He however, was proved wrong as Henry’s previous years had been considered to be a valuable lesson to him; “He comes o’er with our wilder days. Not measuring what use we made of them.” Henry sees his past as treasured mistakes, those that helped him see life as an
…show more content…
“Hear him but reason in divinity… you would desire the king were made a prelate.” This example portrays Henry’s knowledge in religion, having to be desired to be seen as a bishop by many people due to the use of his words. His clear speech is further observed as he speaks of Dauphin, “Tell the pleasant prince this mock of his hath turned his balls into gun-stones.” His tone had surprisingly been calm for a person who had just been insulted in front of his people, somehow inciting a rather powerful and scary figure. He sends a threatening message to Dauphin, his use of words had been creative as he changed a matter of humour to a menacing attitude. It is clear that his talent with language is an extraordinary quality that he possess, which happens to be a suitable characteristic for a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To some extent Henry VII was successful in dealing with the challenges to his royal authority in the years 1485 to 1509. However, there were also limitations to this success. This essay will evaluate Henry’s actions, meaning that a conclusion can be drawn on how effective they in fact were.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    During this essay the questions that will be discussed will be ‘Was this a new monarchy? and ‘Was Henry VII and innovator? But as said before, his biggest problem was money.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s “Richard III” exists as a providential narrative in support of the Tudor Myth; that it was only through the divinely sanctioned rule of Henry VII that brought about peace after an era of turmoil under the reign of Richard III. As such, Shakespeare’s pro-Tudor bias highlights the politically and morally absolutist agenda of his time.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry VII is known for his wise and sensible decisions while in power. Polydore Vergill, a historian, claimed that in government he was ‘shrewd and prudent’ and he was thorough during his ‘wise deliberation’. All of these admirable characteristics are ones that are needed for a leader in order for them to maintain a stable country. This is supported by the speech made at Henry’s funeral in 1509, made by John Fisher. Fisher claims that Henry VII’s ‘political wisdom in governance was singular’. Henry is also documented to have been very kind natured, mentioned repeatedly in both sources 1 and 2. ‘He was gracious and kind and was as attentive to his visitors… his hospitality was splendidly generous.’ This statement is evidence of how Henry treated his citizens and his fairness as a leader. John Fisher also described him as ‘goodly and amiable’. Another trait of Henry VII’s that is mentioned in these sourced are his intelligence. ‘His mind was brave and absolute’ and ‘his speech gracious in diverse languages’ prove henry’s intellectuality, which strengthen his ability to lead and be a good king. Vergil, the writer of Source 2, wrote his statement in during Elizabeth I’s reign. As Elizabeth was Henry VII’s granddaughter, this source could be interpreted as biased as he may have been trying to appease his queen- as offending her may have resulted in serious consequences. However contrary to this, the purpose of source 2 was to inform people of British history, meaning Vergill would…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interestingly, Henry's combination of concrete and figurative language to describe different social situations creates an atmosphere of polarity. While a repetition of rhetorical questions exemplifies the king's frustration with sleep, King Henry's use of literary techniques portrays an elevated status, and his mutating tone displays a gradual rise in anger.…

    • 672 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V Ethical Analysis

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It has never been agreed upon that life is an absolute right, but only that death is the absolute outcome. Philosophers call it a prima facie right, this right gets forfeited in actions such as aggravated murder, abortion, physician-assisted suicide, and other heinous crimes. However, the great western powers are on sure footing when it comes to this type of permitted murder, but a just war doesn’t make a total war acceptable. Williams Shakespeare’s play Henry V is loosely based upon England’s own ethical dilemmas in the early 1400’s. This is especially true when conflicting governments go into a war just because one side believes themselves to be in a just war the other may not.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dreamsong 29 Analysis

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “There sat down, once, a thing on Henry’s heart só heavy, if he had a hundred years & more… Henry could not make good”.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The king Henry speaks a great majority in this play since he is aware of the power of his charisma and efficiency in which he transmits his messages. When a messenger delivers a box of tennis balls to Henry as an insulting reminder of his immature and irresponsible youth, Henry responds with a intimidating message. This is the moment when Henry officially…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Renaissance Dbq

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Act 1, Henry asks Canterbury's opinion on taking over France, stating that a harsh war would ensue only if Canterbury finds that it is just. In that situation Henry places the responsibility on Canterbury's shoulders, since Canterbury argued for the idea. In Act 2, Scene 4, Henry has Exeter tell King Charles that Henry demands the throne of France. Henry demands that if King Charles doesn't comply, he would be accountable for all the bloodshed of the war. In this way, he would be able to say that people died because King Charles refused to give up his crown. In Act 3, Scene 3, Henry threatens the French village of Harfleur with rape, and death amongst the citizens, unless the governor surrenders the village. Henry attempts to make the governor of Harfleur responsible for having English troops reek havoc on the village. In Act 4, Scene 1, Henry disguises himself under a cloak, and converses with various soldiers. One soldier, Williams, criticizes Henry's recent actions, explaining that they've hurt many soldiers. The disguised Henry is offended that he has blamed him, and so he challenges Williams to a…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cardinal Wolsey's Speech

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the speech from William Shakespeare’s Henry VIII Cardinal Wolsey has just lost his position as Advisor to the King. Wolsey’s reaction is a soliloquy filled with hate and bitterness where he conveys his complex emotions by using metaphors, the third person, diction, and tone.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays