Preview

Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation
Illegal Searches of Prisoners and those on Parole and Probation

Outline

I. Introduction
II. On Imprisonment, Parole and Probation
III. Purpose and Legality of Searches
IV. Illegal Searches in the Case of Prisoners, Parolees and Probationers
V. Conclusion
VI. References

I. Introduction The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are



References: Adelman, Stanley E. (2006). U.S. V Knights: Supreme Court Rules on Searches of Probation by Policies. American Probation and Parole Association. [Online]. Available:http://www.appa-net.org/PSN/pdfs/USv_Knights.pdf Avitan, Galit and Concepcion, Theresa.(2006, February). Supreme Court Oral Arrangements Preview: Samson v California. [Online]. Available: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/04-9728.html Flex Your Rights Foundation. (2005). Illegal Police Searches. [Online]. Available: http://www.flexyourrights.org/illegal_police_searches Illegal Strip Search 's San Francisco Jails. [Online]. Available: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi- bin/articl....DTL&type=news Lectric Law Library 's Legal Lexicon. (2006). Fourth Amendment. [Online]. Available: http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f081.htm Leicht, Justus. (2006, November). CagePrisoners. [Online]. Available: http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=17697 [Online]. Available: http://www.bartleylawfirm.com/criminal.htm [Online]. Available: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page =us/000/97- 581.html Roberts, Thomas H. (2006). Fourth Amendment Law. [Online]. Available: http://www.robertslaw.org/4thamend.htm What is an Illegal Search? [Online]. Available: http://www.legalmatch.com/law- library/article/illegal-searches.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In schneckloth, the argument that voluntary consent could not be valid unless the D knew that he/she had a right to refuse the request to being searched was rejected because the court believes that the gov. does not need to establish the reasonableness of effective consent. Just as it wouldn’t be practical to enforce the consent search the requirement’s details of an effective warning it would also be unreasonable for officers to always inform the people they are detaining that they are able to leave before the consent to search was…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The discovery and search are procedures affirmed by cases New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, (1981), Arizona v. Gant, 566 U.S. 332, (2009) and Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, (1999). In the case of New York v. Belton, the court ruled that officers can search a car and any compartments in the car after conducting an arrest. This allows the search of the vehicle in the case of Rounds, because he was in custody in the patrol car, and he was arrested. Arizona v. Gant held that the search of a vehicle, after its occupant is arrested, is permissible if it is reasonable to believe that there is evidence linked to the arrest. Since Officer Towns first arrested and placed Rounds in the patrol car and then moved to question the opaque bag, he was in his right, especially because there was reason to believe that the contents of the bag could be linked to evidence of Rounds’s past crime: possession of marijuana. The prosecution cites Wyoming v. Houghton as well. This case dictates that as long as there is probable cause to search a vehicle, all following searches, including those of its contents are legal. Since there was probable cause to search Rounds’s vehicle, the recovery and seizure of the opaque bag was constitutional.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Search and Seize Paper

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most famous search and seizure is Mapp v. Ohio. This case happens back in 1961, March 29 and end on June 19, 1961. Which were an unreasonable searches and seizures what relates on the fourth Amendment. When the police received a tip that Dollree Mapp and her daughter were harboring a suspected bombing fugitive, they immediately went to her house and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and under his advice she refused to give them entry because they did not have a warrant. Later on that day more officers came to her door and demanded that they be allowed to enter her house. After Mapp refused, they opened a door to the house through forced entry. Knock down her door completely. Mapp confronted them and demanded to see the search warrant. The police waved a piece of paper in the air claiming it was the warrant and Mapp grabbed it and put it down her shirt. The police eventually got the "warrant" back from Mapp. Also when the cop took the paper back for the warrant for her Mapp was taking a deep thought on how was that was right for him to not let her see the information about the warrant. Next, Mapp was cuffed her feet and went on to search her entire house for the fugitive. When they reached her basement they found a trunk containing a small collection of pornographic books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp said the trunk was left in the basement by a previous tenant and was not aware of its contents. The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession of obscene material. On her arrest she knows the laws for Ohio but they didn’t even give her time to discuss or tell who use to live in their home before her. No fugitive or any evidence of one was ever found at the house. Nothing but pic what Mapp didn’t have a clue who they belong to. At her trial in the Court room, Mapp was charged based on the evidence that was presented by the police. Mapp's attorney questioned the police about the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1, do you think the conduct of the officer is a "search" within the 4th Amendment requiring a warrant? Why or why not?…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Dbq Analysis

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a line between valid and invalid searches. The U.S. government used means of searching in public territory to bust a vast marijuana growing facility. They used a thermal radiation detection device without consent, but in a fair way. The police did not invade private information within the private place. There were suspicions of illegal substance, and they used a new form of technology, which helps make or break the case. With these motives, the government did not go too far in the DLK case.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper discusses the underlying circumstances to obtaining a warrant, and proving probable cause. Certain exceptions are made by law in some situations, such as searching vehicles. All officers of the law, and court officials are legally obligated to follow all rights reserved by the Fourth Amendment, and without doing so they could jeopardize their case. Investigation must take place before an officer can prove probable cause to a judge, and obtain a warrant. Warrants are necessary documents in apprehending suspects, conducting searches, and seizures. Without warrants, in most cases, evidence will be ruled as inadmissible. There are several ways to prove probable cause to obtain warrants. Without sufficient probable cause a warrant can not be issued to officers.…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a landmark supreme court case, called the united states versus weeks, the supreme courts created a rule to our criminal procedure called the exclusionary rule. What the exclusionary rule means is that if the police obtain evidence against you in violation of your constitutional rights, they cannot use that evidence against you to prove your guilt or innocence at a trial. An example of this would be police searching your home without a search warrant. If they found illegal item in your home during that search, they could not be used against you at trial. Now the important thing to remember about the exclusionary rule, however, is that it does not mean you are automatically free to go. It only means that that particular piece of evidence is…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A justifiable search could have many factors that would allow an officer to conduct a proper search or make a lawful detention and stops. One of them is a search warrant, which carries a limited authority to detain persons present and also search the property detailed on the warrant. Another is a criminal profile; an example would be of a drug dealer that would fit the physical description given to the officer. Anonymous tip, multiple informant’s, an example is like two or more persons able to identify someone that has committed a crime, and of course police observation. However if the officer sees something suspicious he/she has to articulate why such person has broken the law and given him/her probable cause to do a warrantless search or detention on such said person. Scope falls in the actual process of the search, meaning that you could only reasonably search with in the search area, an example that my teacher Mr. Enos discussed in class, was if your searching for alcohol in a vehicle then you could only search were alcohol could be reasonably hidden inside a car. Place refers to a public or private area, an…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause. This amendment impacts law enforcement because police need a warrant to make arrests and searches. This is not applicable if the officer has first-hand knowledge of an event and the evidence is likely to be destroyed or the subject will abscond if time is taken to get a warrant. If a warrantless search is made by the police that should have been made only after a warrant was issued, then all knowledge gained by that evidence is not allowed in testimony.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police History Policing

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The relationship between the government and police organizations affects police practices on a daily basis and at all levels, local and national. The Federal Government sets standard that need to be followed. An example of a Federal ruling regarding policing has much to do with the Miranda Rights. A criminal named Ernesto Miranda was let free based on Supreme Court Rule. In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court overturned his conviction and ruled that police officers had to advise suspects of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being interrogated (Walker Katz, 2011). Since then, the Miranda Rights have been a national standard that affect policing on a day to day basis. Conclusion…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures; however, it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures if there is reasonable doubt. Searches are determined on two important interests. The first is the intrusion on the individual’s Fourth Amendment Rights; the second includes legitimate government interests such as national security. What constitutes a reasonable suspicion? Where must a public official draw the line? How should one address any “gray area” that might arise?…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the police use searches or surveillance techniques that raises Fourth Amendment concerns and initial question that must be answered is: Did the person claiming the protection of the Fourth Amendment have a reasonable expectation of privacy that was invaded by the police actions? Consider the following examples and explain whether you think the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures. Modern officials have granted police officers in New York City an incentive to respect the amendment. The Stop and Frisk program employed by the New York Police Department, gives police officers the right to initiate a stop of an individual on the street allegedly and do a quick search of their outer clothes for weapons based on if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has or is about to take place and the person stopped is armed or dangerous. This reasonable suspicion is not based with specific facts but from the hunches from New York Police officers.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays