Preview

Impact of Dividend Policy on Companies’ Performance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Impact of Dividend Policy on Companies’ Performance
IMPACT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON COMPANIES’ PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC LISTED COMPANIES IN MALAYSIA

1.0

INTRODUCTION

Dividend policy is the regulations and guidelines that a company uses to decide to make dividend payments to shareholders. Dividends are payments made to stockholders from a firm's earnings, whether those earnings were generated in the current period or in previous periods. When a company makes a profit, they must decide on what to do with those profits. They could continue to retain the profits within the company, or they could pay out the profits to the owners of the firm in the form of dividends. Once the company decides on whether to pay dividends, they may establish a dividend structure, which may in turn impact on investors and perceptions of the company in the financial markets which bring impact on the firm’s value. Several dividend policy issues arose on how dividend policy affects the value of the business whereas there are five explanations for paying dividends developed by researchers, those includes Signaling Effect of Dividend, Clientele Effect, Bird-in-theHand Theory, Tax Preference, and Flotation Costs. The focus of this paper is to examining the dividend policy adopted by public listed companies in Malaysia and the impact of dividend policy on companies performance. This study provides evidence that the KLSE-listed firms follow less stable dividend policies and their dividend payments are closely related to changes in earnings but they do not immediately omit dividends when earnings decrease. This paper is divided into five sections. Section two below, is a review of relevant literature. Section 3, details of data and methodology. The following section, Section 4, presents the results and analysis. The final section, Section 5 concludes and discusses some recommendations.

2.0

ORGANISATION OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW

How firms determine their dividend policy has been a puzzle to financial economists for many years. In their



References: Aliahmed H.J. (2010). BBPW3203 Financial Management II. Selangor: Open University Malaysia Baker H. Kent, Tarun K.Mukherjee and Ohannes George Paskelian (2006), “How Norwegian Managers View Dividend Policy”, Global Finance Journal, Vol. 17(1), 155-176 Bhattacharya, S. (1979), “Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and the Bird in the Hand Fallacy”, Journal of Econ., 10, 259-270 10 Black (1976) “The Dividend Puzzle”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol.2, 5-8 Brav, Alon. John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, Roni Michaely (2005), “Payout Policy in the 21st Century”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 77 (3), 483 – 527. Chen, Z, Yan-Leung Cheung, Aris Stouraitis and Anita W.S. Wong (2005), “Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance, and Dividend Policy in HongKong”, PacificBasin Finance Journal, Vol.13(4), 431-449 Chin-Bun Tse (2005), “Use Dividends to Signal or Not: An Examination of the UK Dividend Payout Patterns.” Managerial Finance, Vol. 31(4), 12-33 Chung, K.K. And C. Charoenwong (1991), “Investment Options, Assets in Place, and the Risk of Stocks.” Financial Management, Vol. 20, 21-33 Collin, D.W., S. P. Kothari (1989), “An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross-Sectional Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, 143-181 DeAngelo, H. and DeAngelo, L., (2000), “Controlling Stockholders and the Disciplinary Role of Payout Policy: a study of the Times Mirror Company.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 56, 153-207 DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L. and Skinner, D., (1996) “Reversal of Fortune Dividend Signaling and the Disappearance of Sustained Earnings Growth” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, 341-371 Fama, E and Babiak, H. (1968) “Dividend Policy:an Empirical analysis”, American Statistical Association Journal, Vol.63, 1132-1161 Fama, E.F., French K.R. (2001) “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?” Journal Financ. Econ. Vol. 60, 3-43 Ghosh, C and D.F. Sirmans (2006), “Do Managerial Motives Impact Dividend Decisions in REITs?”, Journal of Real Estate Finance Econ, 32, 327-355 15 Grullon G. Michaely, R. and Bhaskaran Swaminathan (2002), “Are Dividends Changes a Sign of Firm Maturity?” Journal of Business, Vol.75, 387-424 Grullon, G., Michaely, R. Benartzi, S., Thaler, R.H. (2003) “Dividend Changes do not Signal Changes in Future Profitability.” Journal of Business (in press). Gugler, Klau, B. Burcin Yurtoglu (2003), “Corporate Governance and Dividend Payout Policy in Germany”, European Economic Review, Vol. 47 (4), 731 – 758. 11 Gul and Kealey (1999). “Chaebol, Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Debt and Dividend Policies of Korea Companies”. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol 13, 401-416. Healy & Palepu (1988), “Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations and Omission.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, 149-176 Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W. H. (1986), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics Vol.3, 305-360 La Porta, R. et al. (2000), “Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 55 (1), 305-360 Lease, K. John, A.Kalay, U.Loewenstein and O.h. Sarig (2000), “ Dividend Policy: It impact on firm value.” Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Lintner, J (1956), “Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes”, America Economic Review, 46, 97-113 Miller, M.H., Modigliani, F. (1961) “Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares”, Journal of Business, 34, 411-413 Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG) and University Technologi MARA (UiTM) (2006), “Dividend Scanner 2005” Short, Helen, Hao Zhang and Kevin Keasey (2002), “The Link Between Dividend Policy and Institutional Ownership” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.8, 105-122 Smith, C.W. Jr. and Ross L. Watts (1992), “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economies, Vol.32, 263-292 Stacescu, B (2006), “Dividend Policy in Switzerland”, Journal of Economic Literature, Nov, 1-44 Few S.L. et al. (2007). Dividend Policy: Evidence from Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.um.edu.my/984/1/Ling,FS_%26_Others.pdf. [2010, Nov 15] Baker H.K. and Powell G.H. (1999) Dividend policy issues in regulated and unregulated firms: a managerial perspective Volume: 25 Issue: 6 Bursa Malaysia: Annual Reports. [Online]. Available: http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/listed_companies/company_announcements/ annual_reports/index.jsp. [2010, Nov 15] 12

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mini Case Chapter 17

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2) The terms “irrelevance,” and “dividend preference, or bird-in-the-hand,” and “tax effects” have been used to describe three major theories regarding the way dividend payout…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rosetta Stone Ipo

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Denis, D.J. & Osobov, I. (2008), "Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy", journal of Financial Economics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 62-82.…

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is designed to provide an introduction to payout policy and Modigliani and Miller’s dividend irrelevance proof. Consideration is given to why profitable technology firms like Cisco Systems, Microsoft and Intel used no debt, retained large cash balances and preferred to return cash to shareholders in the form of repurchases rather than dividends; how the tax and market environment for dividends has changed over time; and what impact the proposed dividend tax reforms and market environment of 2003 will have on future payout policy.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    505 Quiz 1

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Frankfuter, M, George and Wood Bob, G (2003). Dividend Policy Theory and Practice” Academic Press…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Avon's Dividend Policy

    • 1699 Words
    • 6 Pages

    TABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTION3PERFORMANCE OF AVON'S STOCK FROM 1978-19883EVALUATION OF AVON' S FINANCIAL CONDITION IN MID-19885PURPOSE OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER6EVALUATION OF THE TRADE-OFF7REFERENCES10INTRODUCTIONA firm's decisions about dividends are often mixed up with other financing and investment decisions. Some firms pay low dividends because management is optimistic about the firm's future and wishes to retain earnings for expansion. Other firms might finance capital expenditures largely by borrowing. All the above are examples of dividend policies which can be defined more precisely as the trade-off between retaining earnings on the one hand and paying out cash and issuing new shares on the other. In order to understand the dividend policy we must understand that this phrase means different things to different people (R.A. Brealey & S.C. Myers, 2003).…

    • 1699 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate Finance

    • 7798 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Pecking order theory 13 2.6. Optimal capital structure 13 3.Dividend 14 3.1. Dividend policy .14 3.2. Competitors Dividend Analysis …16 3.2.1 Brickworks Limited…................................................................................................... 16 3.2.2.…

    • 7798 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    n an article published in this journal a year ago, we reported the findings of our study of corporate financing and payout policies covering some 6,700 industrial companies over the past 30 years.1 Our analysis suggests that the most important systematic determinant of a company’s leverage ratio and dividend yield is the nature of its investment opportunities. Companies whose value consists largely of intangible growth options (as indicated by high market-to-book ratios and heavy R&D spending) have significantly lower leverage ratios and dividend yields, on average, than companies whose value is represented primarily by tangible assets (with low market-to-book ratios and high depreciation expense). We explained this pattern of financing and dividend choices as follows: For high-growth firms, the “underinvestment problem” associated with heavy debt financing and the flotation costs of high dividends make both policies potentially quite costly. But, for mature firms with limited growth opportunities, high leverage and dividends can have substantial benefits from controlling the “free cash flow” problem—the temptation of managers to overinvest in mature businesses or make diversifying acquisitions. (Taxes, too, may play a role in this pattern since low-growth companies are likely to be generating more taxable income and thus have greater use for interest tax shields. But, because there are important managerial incentive benefits as well as costs to having higher debt and dividends, companies would have optimal leverage and dividend ratios even in a world without income taxes.)…

    • 10526 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. INTRODUC TION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. B rief Objectives .................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Brief Liter ature Rev iew ........................................................................................... 4 3.1 Cornerstones of dividend policy ................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Equity Agency Cost Theory........................................................................................................ 5 3.3 Remedies to Agency Conflicts and their Costs ........................................................................... 5 3.4 Jensen’s Free Cash Flow Hypothesis .......................................................................................... 6 3.4 Using the Tobin’s Q .................................................................................................................... 6 3.5 Further Studies ............................................................................................................................ 7 4.0 Research M ethodo logy ............................................................................................. 7 4.1 Data Collection Methods ............................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Sources of Data ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Sample......................................................................................................................................... 8 4.4 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.5 Use of Models…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract In the U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany, France, and Japan, the propensity to pay dividends is higher among larger, more profitable firms, and those for which retained earnings comprise a large fraction of total equity. Although there are hints of reductions in the propensity to pay dividends in most of the sample countries over the 1994 to 2002 period, they are driven by a failure of newly listed firms to initiate dividends when expected to do so. Dividend abandonment and the failure to initiate by existing nonpayers are economically unimportant except in Japan. Moreover, in each country, aggregate dividends have not declined and are concentrated among the largest, most profitable firms. Finally, outside of the U.S. there is little evidence of a systematic positive relation between relative prices of dividend paying and non-paying firms and the propensity to pay dividends. Overall, these findings cast doubt on signaling, clientele, and catering explanations for dividends, but support agency cost-based lifecycle theories.…

    • 15700 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The article is called Dividend policy: A review of Theories and Empirical Evidence. In this article, the main theories on dividend policy are described and their credibility is evaluated.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ABSTRACT The objective of this research is to examine the influences of earnings per share and dividend payout ratio to common stock holding period. The research was conducted at the companies listed in the LQ-45 Index in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2010. This type of study is a hypothesis-testing research. The research method used in this research is purposive sampling. Sample in this study are companies registered in the LQ-45 Index that have complete data for the variables studied. Sum of the sample is the 45 sample acquired during the three years of observation. Data collection techniques using secondary data from financial statements that have been audited and published and quantitative data obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (www.idx.co.id). Data is analysed by using multiple regression analysis. The results showed that (1) the earnings per share and dividend payout ratio simultaneously has not influence the holding period, (2) while the earnings per share partially has not influence on the holding period, and (3) dividend payout ratio has not influence on the holding period. Keywords: earnings per share, dividend payout ratio, holding period.…

    • 4049 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jiraporn P, Chintrakarn P (2009) Staggered boards, managerial entrenchment, and dividend policy. J Financ Serv Res 36:1–19…

    • 14152 Words
    • 76 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Advanced Accounting Homework

    • 10739 Words
    • 43 Pages

    The cost method of accounting for investments often caused a lack of objectivity in reported income figures. With a large block of the investee’s voting shares, an investor could influence the amount and timing of the investee’s dividend distributions. Thus, when enjoying a good earnings year, an investor might influence the investee to…

    • 10739 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Irrelevance Theory

    • 5931 Words
    • 24 Pages

    A firm’s value is given by the sum of the present value of forecasted cash flows. Resting on Miller and Modigliani’s (1961) dividend irrelevance proposition, practitioners and some academics do not use actual cash flows; rather, they discount potential dividends, also known as free cash flows or free cash flows to firm (e.g. Damodaran, 2006a,b; Colepand, Koller and Murrin, 2000). Magni and Vélez-Pareja (2009) support the idea that only actual cash flows should be discounted, whereas potential dividends distort valuation in all cases where excess cash retained is not invested in NPV-neutral…

    • 5931 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays