Preview

Impact of John Stuart Mill’s Philosophies on Philippines’ Society, Politics and Economy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1093 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Impact of John Stuart Mill’s Philosophies on Philippines’ Society, Politics and Economy
Impact of John Stuart Mill’s Philosophies on Philippines’ Society, Politics and Economy
Mendoza, A.; SocSci 2 WBYDX

John Stuart Mill’s social, political, and economic philosophies are widely applied in the Philippine setting. His conception of social liberty, feminism, political democracy and economic democracy is practiced in the country, although not holistically applied or not well-carried out at some cases. Philippines, as a democratic country, adapts the libertarian culture that Mill believes to be the best for achieving intellectual and social development. Every Filipino citizen is sovereign and free to do what he wants as long as he does not harm others. Mill’s proposed ways to obtain ‘social liberty’, which are having the political liberties (rights) and having the constitutional system are being exercised on the country.
Freedom of speech is one Filipino right stated in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Mill advocates freedom of speech in his work On Liberty and argues that free discourse is a necessary condition for intellectual and social progress. Mill argues that airing opinions is productive as individuals tend to abandon fallacious beliefs if they are active in exchanging ideas and in re-examining beliefs in debate process.
Voting right, that exercises ‘tyranny of the majority’, is also included in the Philippine Bill of Rights. In the country, elections of government officials are being conducted to follow public choice. Mill advocates the tyranny of the masses ‘in which decisions made by a majority place its interests so far above those of an individual or minority group’ and in which tyranny of political rulers are being opposed.
Women’s rights are also stressed in the Philippines. Filipino women are empowered and protected by law. Feminist groups are actively advocating women empowerment. Mill also advocates feminism. In his book The Subjection of Women, he argued that the difference between men and women is insignificant and



References: McCloskey, H. John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study. 1972. “National Internal Revenue Code.” Bureau of Internal Revenue Website. Bureau of Internal Revenue

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spanish 2 answes

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Freedom of Speech is one of the most powerful amendments that we have as apart of the United States Constitution. Without this right many ideas, beliefs and inventions would not exist today and the majority of the society would be left in ignorance. This right is given to all American citizens and allows them to speak their minds, beliefs and ideas to anybody of people that are willing to listen to them. Though Freedom of Speech is considered a general terms that applies to all forms of speech, there are a few exceptions to the rule.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill was someone who believed that everyone, rich or poor, was entitled to their very own opinions. John Stuart Mill also believed that freedom of expression is valuable for two main reasons. The first reason would be…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill also believes that members of the rising middle class who are successful in business and rising to the upper class should have the bulk of the political power. Mill believes being good in business takes all when it comes to government. Mill supports this theory by stating that in order to make it in business, one has to know what the people need and want and be more efficient than your competitors. Mill believes in order for a government to be successful, it must be run similar to a business and cater to the needs of people while remaining efficient.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Mill's perspective, oppression of the dominant part is more regrettable than oppression of government in light of the fact that it is not constrained to a political capacity. The predominant feelings inside of society will be the premise of all tenets of behavior inside of society. In this manner there can be no protection in law against the oppression of the larger part. The greater part assessment may not be the right supposition. The main avocation for a man's inclination is the individual’s inclination itself whenever a specific good conviction is the situation. Individuals will adjust themselves either for or against this issue. To analyze the examination of past governments, Mill recommends a solitary standard for which a man's freedom may be limited and that the main reason for which authority can be legitimately practiced over any individual from an civilized group, without wanting to, will be to prevent harms to others. Consequently, when it is not helpful, it may be…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and a political economist, had an important part in forming liberal thought in the 19th century. Mill published his best-known work, _On Liberty,_ in 1859. This foundational book discusses the concept of liberty. It talks about the nature and the limits of the power performed by society over an individual. The book also deals with the freedom of people to engage in whatever they wish as long as it does not harm other persons.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first and most fundamental principle Mill holds is outlined in the introductory chapter and describes the necessity for man to be free over “Over himself, over his own body and mind” (Mill, 1859: 31). Individual liberty is not only considered personally fulfilling, but also beneficial to the progress of civilisation for “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest” (Mill, 1859: 33). It is important to note that Mill does not endorse freedom of expression for its own sake but for the greater purpose of stimulating discourse “His argument for liberty of expression is in fact an argument for liberty of discussion” (Larvor, 2006: 3) To support his claims, he…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech is God’s gift to mankind. Through speech a human being conveys his thoughts, sentiments and feelings to others. Freedom of expression is a natural right, which a human being aquires on birth. It is, therefore, a basic right.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom of speech is the right to communicate ideas verbally. This right is used in…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The First Amendment

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • Freedom of speech is the right to communicate your ideas verbally. Freedom of speech is my favorite right, it allows me to tell my opinion.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Of Majority

    • 669 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Mill criticizes about a majority Muslims wanting and insisting that pork should not be eaten and must be banned from their country, which is a small claim that he uses to get to the bigger issue of banning polygamy. Polygamy is the state of marriage to many spouses or a marriage that includes more than two spouses and is punished in Spain. Mill’s principle state that people may speak up against those actions and take a stab at trying to change their opinions…

    • 669 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This argumentative essay will discuss whether or not a Millian society, based upon Mill’s writing, would have a governing body that would be able to provide an equal basis for positive and negative freedom for its community members. I will argue that a society built solely upon Mill’s arguments would have a government that would ensure people have negative freedom; however this regime would not provide any significant amount of positive freedoms. I will argue this society and government has mostly negative freedoms with this specific Millian society’s views around: individuality linked to anti-paternalism and self-regarding actions. Although there are other aspects to a Millian society, both individuality and self-regarding actions are highly important in any functioning society. This Millian society’s government would provide its citizens with negative freedoms however in such a society…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Mill, individuality is seen as essential to human progress and development, to the extent where he supposes that “it is only the cultivation of individuality which produces, or can produce, well-developed human beings”. We can infer from this quote that Mill has a strong preference on the freedom of action alongside that of thought and discussion, which constitutes a belief in the necessity of allowing different ‘experiments in living’ as the route towards creating the greatest happiness within society, as he believes true progress can only occur through development of individuals within society rather than the society over the individuals. If this does not appear as a revelation of much significance, it is arguably because of the effect Mill’s insight has had on modern society, as Mill gives great evidence of…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s Essay On Liberty, Mill makes many arguments regarding the liberty of thought. The overall argument of this essay is centered on the question of what kind of power the society should be allowed to exercise over an individual. Mill discusses specific examples such as, the oppression of public opinion, or expression of one’s individual opinion, and beliefs. He then goes on to discuss the argument of whether or not an individual should have the right to act on those opinions, and when authority has the right to limit someone’s over all individuality. It is important to understand that Mill was not trying to argue the freedom of people, but rather for the ability of people to think for themselves.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Though these advocates were exceptional, the man the most influential in defining free speech and its importance is John Stuart Mill and his essay “On Liberty”. “On Liberty” proposes that for freedom to properly flourish, it must be free in all aspects, with almost no limitations from any source, either government or individuals. Although written in 1859, Mill’s opinion is still relevant and can be applied to current political controversies and events in Canada such as the infamous Human Rights Complaints against Maclean’s Magazine. Thus, “On Liberty”, a treatise that espoused a doctrine of almost unrestricted speech and action, is still applicable to modern political events. Furthermore, it provides an almost perfect analysis of free speech and the proper limits on…

    • 2604 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sison, Jose Maria. The Philippine Revolution: The Leader’s View. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1989.…

    • 5477 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays