Preview

Importance Of The Fourth Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Importance Of The Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment was introduced into the Constitution of the United States as a part of the Bill of Rights on September 5, 1789. It was a direct response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, which was a type of general search warrant used by the government during the American Revolution. (LAWS) The amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Fourth Amendment reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Shmoop Editorial Team). The general …show more content…
Many citizens use to believe that if you were pulled over, they were obligated to have their vehicle searched. In our present time, more individuals now know that unless the officer has a probable cause the individual does not have to consent the police officer in searching their personal vehicle. What many may forget or not know is that there are certain exceptions to this amendment that will allow a police officer to search and seize their personal vehicle without their …show more content…
(Jack Ryan). This is basically saying that when an officer approaches an individual’s vehicle and sees drug paraphernalia or suspicious items that could be related to a crime, the officer than has the ability to search your vehicle for additional evidence related to what provoked them to exercise this warrantless search without your consent. By having drug paraphernalia or other suspicious items in plain view, the individual has now given probable cause needed for the officer to search the vehicle. It is very important to understand that in order for a police officer to exercise this right, the items in question have to be in plain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After Robinette was pulled over for speeding and given a warning, technically he was free to leave. But he was asked if his car could be searched and he consented. Robinette claims he would not have consent if he knew he could have declined. So he feels that the officer should have stated something along the lines of “you are free to go” before asking to search the car. Robinette feels this is a violation of his right within the Fourth Amendment. It is then discovered that the Fourth Amendment does not require the suspect to be advised he is free to go before consent is considered voluntary.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue brought into question in the Terry vs. Ohio case in 1968 involved a police officer, McFadden, who was patrolling the area in normal clothes. He came across two men pacing the area suspiciously and glancing into a store. He the watched them meet at a street corner frequently where they were joined by another man. After watching them do this approximately twenty-four times he approached the group and asked them their names. He patted down the overcoat that the man was wearing and felt a revolver, which he then removed. The defense argued the issue to be admissibility of evidence uncovered by an improper search and seizure. They argued that the Fourth Amendment protects the people despite where they are; at home or on the streets. It…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lago Vista Case

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atwater v City of Lago Vista (2001) was a case concerning the fourth amendment. This case was where the defendant Atwater was arrested for a seat belt violation. O’Connor wrote the dissent that the arrest was unreasonable. O’Connor stated “…pointless indignity’ that served no discernible state interest and yet holds that her arrest was constitutionally permissible (Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2005).” She implies that if an officer believes someone committed a crime in their presence they can arrest the accused person. This in O’Connor’s opinion presents an issue with the precedence it sets. To her it seems that police officers can use this to explore options that would be otherwise not permitted without an arrest.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheetum Case Summary

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment is intended to protect the security a man relies upon when he places himself or his property within a constitutionally protected area, be it his home or his office,…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v Ohio

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    iii. For Mapp, the police, who possessed no warrant to search her property, had acted improperly. Any evidence found during the search should have been thrown out of court and her conviction overturned. For the state of Ohio, even if the search was made improperly, the State was not prevented from using the evidence seized because “the Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure.” Ohio argued that the 14th Amendment does not guarantee 4th Amendment protections in the State courts.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Justice Harlan wholeheartedly agree with the Court 's ultimate holding in this case, He was constrained to fill in a few gaps, as he saw it because what was said by this Court has serve as initial guidelines for law enforcement authorities and courts throughout the land as this important new field of law develops. A police officer 's right to make an on-the-street "stop" and an accompanying "frisk" for weapons is, of course, bounded by the protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds and he agrees, that, while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most cases is whether evidence produced by a frisk is admissible, the problem is to determine what makes a frisk reasonable. Concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public, and though that danger might not warrant routine general weapons checks, it could well warrant action on less than a "probability." In the absence of state authority, policemen have no more right to "pat down" the outer clothing of passers-by, or of persons to whom they address casual questions, than does any other citizen. Consequently, the Ohio courts did not rest the constitutionality of this frisk upon any…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution: ““The right of the people to be secure in their persons... against unreasonable searches and seizures” (U.S. Const. Amend. IV). Stop and Frisk is a procedure used by several law enforcement agencies in which an officer stops and questions a pedestrian, then proceeds to frisk them for weapons and other contraband. Martin McFadden, an officer for the Cleveland Police Department, saw two men, John W. Terry and Richard Chilton, walking back and forth between two corners of the sidewalk. After meeting up with a third suspect, Katz, the officer proceeded to frisk them, finding a total of two guns between the three men. Terry and Chilton were charged with carrying a concealed weapon and were sentenced to prison time. After the men brought their case to the Supreme Court, their arrest was deemed constitutional. According to the Supreme…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 4th Amendment to the Constitution was given to us for our own protection, it is a right we have to secure us against something called “unreasonable search and seizures” by the government. It limits and gives certain procedures so that the government cannot abuse their powers. The 4th Amendment makes sure that government officials do their jobs as they should, abiding by certain procedures that are describe on how government officials such as police officer’s or sheriff’s, pretty much all law enforcement can go forth with the search and seizure process (Wrightman ,Nietzel, & Fortune, 1994, p. 59-60).…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ohio that legislation was put out to describe how stop and frisks can be done constitutionally. The case was about a Cleveland detective who approached, stopped, questioned, and frisked three men that he believed were acting suspicious. He found out that two of the men were carrying weapons and therefore arrested them. The defense tried to say that that the search and seizure was a violation of the Fourth Amendment because there was no probable cause. In the final ruling, “the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that an officer can legally stop a person if the officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 4th Amendment is extremely important to our country. This amendment in the United States Constitution provides the right for people to be secure in their own person, paper, and home, protects against unreasonable search and seizures, and states that no warrant will be issued without probable cause. 4th Amendment laws are more strict than any other amendment, and leaves absolutely no wiggle room to allow changes. Despite these strict laws being in place the government is at war with Apple because Apple encrypts everything to make a very good security, and they say allowing the government into people's phones would be against the 4th Amendment. 4th Amendment laws are very important, and should be followed closely. The 4th Amendment helps…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Protection from improbable search and seizure is something the Fourth Amendment ensures, and while this can be beneficial to people who want their privacy, it can also prevent law enforcement from collecting evidence that is critical for cases. As mentioned before, the FISA Amendment Act has been playing a big part in proving whether or not the Fourth Amendment is being followed. The Patriot Act amended the FISA Amendment Act which expanded the monitoring of people's metadata such as phone…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution was added as part of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791”(swindle Law Group). “In 1604, Sir Edward Coke first identified this right. “He said that “The…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment.” Justice Brandeis wholeheartedly believed that the Fourth Amendment protects privacy too. In Poe v. Ullman Justice Harlan argued that the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause could be used to strike the law.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th amendment

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consenting to a search request automatically makes the search legal in the eyes of the law. And the 4th Amendment doesn’t require officers to tell you about your right to refuse. So if you’re pulled over, don’t try to figure out whether or not the officer has probable cause to legally search you. You always have the right to refuse search requests by stating, “Officer, I don’t consent to any searches.” Repeat, if necessary.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays