Preview

Inadmissible At Trial

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
124 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inadmissible At Trial
Yes, I do believe that evidence that has been obtained unconstitutionally should be inadmissible at trial.

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects all of us against unreasonable searches and seizures. Therefore, the police or any other law enforcement agents just can't search your property and take your things simply because they don't like you or just because they feel like it. They must have a good reason before they can search your home or office and seize things, such as contraband or evidence of a crime. When the Fourth Amendment is violated, any evidence that can be traced to the illegal search or seizure is fruit of the poisonous tree and can't be used against you and should be inadmissible at trial.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary
    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    Evidence has demonstrated that at the time of unconstitutional interrogation, a search was already in place for the victim, and the body would have inevitably been found. This means had there not be illegal conduct by the police officers, the fairness of the trial would have remained the…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study

    The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case, the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial, he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly, this letter stated that Miranda had full knowledge of his legal rights. From the evidence found, Miranda was sentenced to prison for 20 to 30 years. From here the Supreme Court stated that, “...Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession…” (Miranda V Arizona).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Assignment: Fourth Amendment Exceptions Summary
    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page

    Unit 3 Assignment: Fourth Amendment Exceptions Summary

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no search or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. The exceptions are: searches with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219).…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    T. L. O V New Jersey Case Study
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    T. L. O V New Jersey Case Study

    The 4th amendment states that people have a right to have privacy. If a police officer or any law enforcement comes to your house without a warrant and seized something in your possession they broke a law. Something like this happened in 1984.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fifth Amendment Prohibits Double Jeopardy Analysis
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment Prohibits Double Jeopardy Analysis

    The fifth amendment prohibits double jeopardy (del Carmen, 2014). The concept behind prohibiting double jeopardy is to protect the defendant from being tried and punished twice for a single crime, but this doesn’t mean that after a verdict is handed down the process ends (del Carmen, 2014). They can try and get an appeal so that their case and verdict will be reviewed (del Carmen, 2014).…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Inadmissible: The Superior Court Case
    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Inadmissible: The Superior Court Case

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Controversy: The Fourth Amendment
    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page

    Constitutional Controversy: The Fourth Amendment

    The Fourth Amendment is the most prolific source of constitutional litigation in American history, particularly with application to the states after its incorporation through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. All the arrest that are made has to do with the fourth amendment, so that is something that has a big part in the arrests being made. Every search or seizures that are made by teachers, probation officers, police, airport security, or even a crossing guard are dealing with the fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment is the constitutional sentry whenever someone's privacy is diminished by a governmental search or seizure. This protects them unless there is a reasonable suspicion or if there is a warrant. The Court declares,…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Freedom Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure Essay Example
    • 2148 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Freedom Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure Essay Example

    As said by the Fourth Amendment, " the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against an unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things be seized." In simplest terms the Fourth Amendment says that all searches are to be conducted under authority of a warrant( Barany). Many times this amendment is violated which can result in the dismissal of a case, release of a guilty suspect, or the arrest of an innocent individual that was not properly been given his or her rights. In this paper topics involving the violations and exceptions of the many prongs of the Fourth Amendment including: probable cause, Terry vs. Ohio, exceptions to warrantless search and seizures, racial profiling, rights we are awarded, and the Miranda Warning. The Fourth Amendment has many off shoots and I will try to cover the basics, so that you as a reader can more thoroughly understand your rights and privileges as well as the rights that you do not have in many circumstances.…

    • 2148 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment Protects The Citizen's Privacy
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment Protects The Citizen's Privacy

    The Fourth Amendment protects against illegal search and seizures. This means that a U.S. citizen cannot have themselves, homes and/or possessions searched or confiscated by law enforcement without a legal warrant. It pretty much protects citizen’s privacy. But there are positive and negative effects from this. It protects the citizen’s from law enforcement from searching on the spot without legal documentation authorizing it. On the other hand, thou, it could help criminals dispose of evidence while a judge signs a warrant. The magistrate or judge issues the warrants for arrest and search and seizure not the police officer.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Does The Miranda Right Unsure Justice And Preserve Liberty
    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page

    Does The Miranda Right Unsure Justice And Preserve Liberty

    So do I believe that the Miranda v. Arizona does not unsure justice or preserve…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did the government go too far
    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Did the government go too far

    Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stop and Frisk

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures. Modern officials have granted police officers in New York City an incentive to respect the amendment. The Stop and Frisk program employed by the New York Police Department, gives police officers the right to initiate a stop of an individual on the street allegedly and do a quick search of their outer clothes for weapons based on if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has or is about to take place and the person stopped is armed or dangerous. This reasonable suspicion is not based with specific facts but from the hunches from New York Police officers.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aginst Self-Incrimination Without Due Process
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Aginst Self-Incrimination Without Due Process

    The fifth amendment protects citizens aginst self- incrimination without due process of the law. There are rule and regulations that indivuduals of the law must obey to legally follow through with an investiagation and bring the accused to court so justice will have a chance to be served. “If information is obtained from suspects illegally, then that information is inadmissible in court because it violates the due process rights of the accused”(Brandl, 2014, p.79) If evidence that was illegally obtained was the key factor in the investigation and the, the case won’t result in a victory for the investigators. The indicted has a higher chance of not being found guilty, money and time has been wasted on the case.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wrongful Convictions

    in who goes to prison. Weak and fabricated evidence is seldom looked at in the eyes of the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics