Preview

Indian Removal Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act
Who should move? The Cherokee or Americans? The Indian Removal Act was created by the former President Andrew Jackson in 1830. The Americans wanted to settle land in Georgia, but most of the Cherokee tribes refused. The Indian Removal act of 1830 was not justified and the Cherokees should not move because they fought for the U.S., Cherokees were cheated in trade by the U.S., and the supreme court ruled in favor for the Cherokees.
The Cherokees should not move because they fought for the United States during the War of 1812. Two Native Americans helped the U.S. Their names were Red Jacket and Farmer’s Brother. They helped the U.S. lead a group of Native Americans, one of the five nations. The group of Native Americans helped and fought at Fort
…show more content…
The Native Americans were treated horribly, when they trusted the Americans. The U.S., stole their horses and many died from diseases. This information was gotten from the article called “Allow the Cherokee to Stay,” it stated “Their horses were stolen and hundreds died from disease and malnutrition on the journey.” This quote means that they agreed to move nicely and calmly, but the U.S., still did not treat them fair. That’s not all, when one tribe called the Lakota Nation agreed to move westward because there would be food, water, and land. The U.S., tricked them and they went to imprisonment camps. This was in the article called “ The Betrayal of Native Americans”, it said, “Instead, many Lakota live on reservations (or prisoner of war camps, as they might be called) like Pine Ridge, which is annually one of the most impoverished places in the United States.” This states that Native Americans agree to move where it would be better, but the U.S. still treated them horribly. It was not only the U.S., it was also Canda. The Canadians agreed to help the native groups with money because the U.S. and Canada were the richest nations back then. Instead, the Canadians poisoned their water, soil, and air. Some of the native groups were from the first nations. They were the Inuit, Métis tribe, and others . This was in the article called, “The Betrayal of Native Americans”. The quote stated, “Instead of honoring its …show more content…
Supreme court supported the Cherokee in favor to not let Georgia force them off their land. The Cherokee were tired of fighting and learned to compromise, instead of resulting to scalping and burning people alive. The Cherokee decided to educate themselves. Their leaders were well educated. They even had a constitution, schools, and a newspaper. They went to the president to show him that they were civilized, and that they could hopefully stay. The Cherokee nation were shocked when he said there was nothing he can do. This information was from the article called, “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act”, it stated in quote, “Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper.” This means that instead of leaving their homeland, they can compromise and become more civilized. The Cherokee did not stop because they wanted their freedom. The Cherokee went to William Wirt to take their situation to the Supreme Court. William Wirt took it to court and argued that the independent nation was regarded by the U.S. and its many treaties with them. Then it went to John Marshall, but it was rejected. Until they read John Marshall’s decision, and knew they were going to win. The final decision came and the Cherokee stayed. They were also encouraged by missionaries. This was gotten from the article called “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act.”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Removal Act Dbq

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After years of assimilating to White culture and building a successful, independent economy, the question of whether or not Native Americans residing in the southern states and specifically the Cherokee in Georgia should be removed was hotly debated until the ratification of the Removal Act in 1830.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act went against the indian’s rights, and the indians did not want to move off their land. The Indians were forced off their land because of the Indian Removal Act. The Cherokee tried to go to court to fight the Indian Removal Act, explaining that the act was against their rights. The Cherokee did lose, and eventually were forced to follow the Indian Removal Act. The Native Americans that were moved also had rights to original land they lived on. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution that explained that the Cherokee had full control of the land. That did…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, it was not the entire government that thought Native Americans should be relocated. In Worcester v. Georgia, a case where a Cherokee tribe appealed to the Supreme Court, the ruling was, in fact, in favor of the Cherokee Indians. Chief Justice John Marshall, in the majority opinion of the Court, wrote “The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force.” He clearly stated that the Cherokee Indians have a right to their own land, are completely separate from the state of Georgia, and the whole…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Indian Removal act of 1830 was in short; an act made law by Andrew Jackson relocating many Native American tribes west of the Mississippi river to unsettled lands. This would open up safer territory for those looking to colonize further west than the original thirteen colonies. Here are four men’s messages regarding the act that gives further insight into it all.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Indians fought for their right to control their land which was roughly ¼ the size of Georgia. “We have a perfect and original right to remain in our lands without interruption or molestation.” (Document B) Georgia fought to have them removed saying that they were uncivilized and couldn’t assimilate into American culture, and that they made a contract with tribe leaders. In the case the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokees. John Marshall said “The Cherokee Indians have an unquestionable right to their territory until title should be extinguished by voluntary cession to the United States” (Document B). Jackson disregarded this ruling and had the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place where he forced the Indians west of the Mississippi River along what is now known as “The Trail of…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many had intermarried with Europeans and lived settled lives in farming communities. The Cherokee had written their own constitution, based on the United States Constitution, they had started a newspaper, and had built roads, schools, and churches. As immigrants poured into the United States, however, land became scarce. The Indians had land; the settlers wanted it. Suddenly, it was not enough that some of the native tribes had become very much like the white Americans. At first, the Cherokee in Georgia tried to fight the Indian Removal Act by taking the government to court. In 1832, the Supreme Court ruled against Georgia. (Smith 134) even with the Court’s ruling, the Indian removal act continued. President Jackson ignored the Supreme Court’s verdict, handed down by Chief Justice John Marshall. The President was reported to have said, “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it!” (O’Neill 11). By the end of the decade, tens of thousands of Indians had been moved west. Thousands died on the long, difficult march, which became known as the Trail of…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many events that led up to the removal of the Eastern Cherokee in the early-to-mid 19th century. However, it all really begins in 1830. Major Ridge was discussing treaties regarding selling land to the U.S. Government. The Cherokee believed that lived in their own sanctuary, their paradise, and that their ancestors had always lived here. Major Ridge felt if he could die to preserve his people land’s he would gladly do so. The Cherokee picked the wrong side during the American Revolution which caused American soldiers to desecrate Cherokee lands. He did not wish that same tragedy amongst his people. President Jefferson believed that eventually through cultural assimilation the Indian people and Americans would become one and we would…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1800s, White settlements were expanding westward. This threatened the Cherokee land which was located in the Southeastern part of the United States. This left the Cherokee with a big decision to make for their entire tribe. Would they relocate West ,or stay for the White settlements to invade where they call home. After all, the Cherokee had owned the land for over 10,000 years. It was not the United States’ land to take. This is why many of the Cherokee Nation felt the need to stay. Others wanted to move because they felt that if they did not, then the United States territory would override the Cherokee customs and they would have to follow United States laws. Clearly the best chance of survival for the Cherokee was to stay in…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government didn't give them options; basically gave them land Oklahoma and told them to move there. The Cherokee refused to leave which is exactly what I would have done. The Cherokees wanted to continue on with the traditions of their ancestors. They wanted to live on the land of their ancestors,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is not the case of the Cherokee. The Cherokee live in log house dwellings, and they farm more than they hunt. The Cherokee are very religious and spiritual beings, and they are very close to the land that the whites want them to give up. When the white settlers moved into the east coast, they drove the Cherokee out toward the interior Southeast, including north Georgia. After forcing the Natives out the settlers decided that they wanted that land too, which is the very reason we are meeting here today at Hermitage.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays