Humans as engaged in a war with each other over resources making our live solitary poor nasty brutish and sort. This view of individual is fearful working alone in competition with others now dominates western philosophical tradition.
In indigenous philosophy we are related as individuals as part of kinship based community and as part of nature in balance with the whole. In most western thought society is seen as an aggregate of self-interested individual connected by competition with each other over limited resources creating fear insecurity hopelessness a scarcity of spirit.
Indigenous societies see prosperity in nature resources are abundant shared collaboration fosters environmental stewardship and balance with nature. …show more content…
Two worldviews two very different economic systems.
The dominant western market economy like its worldview driven by an assumption of scarce resources intensive centralized production individual with insatiable appetites accumulating by the standard. 40% of world resources are owned by 1% of people.
In the indigenous economy like its worldview interdependent decentralized production extensive use of resources, promoting responsible resource management abundant kinship a belief in enoughness encourages sharing and cooperation. Reciprocal obligations ensure everyone’s needs are met fairly and equitably, prerequisites for sustainability.
The heath of the economy measured by the health of the gross domestic product. The more we produce consume the better the economy.
A worldview is the common concept of reality that all of us share as a cultural group. Worldviews are pervasive in every society are the beliefs and assumptions by which we as individuals make sense of reality. We get into trouble when two or more different worldviews meet and make uninformed and unaware assumptions about the other without questioning