Industrialized Labor

With the advent of money, the equal acquisition of property through labor became distorted. In consenting to the use of money, men gave up on aspects of their natural rights. This led to the unequal accumulation of what was common; causing appropriation of goods through labor to go beyond what was necessary for sustenance, ultimately producing inequality in the ownership of private property.

In reaching an agreement to use cash, individuals conceded their right to have an equal chance at acquiring un-owned land. This was in contrast to the actual goal of developing money to expand man’s ambition to acquire more of what seemed to be an abundant free take for all. However, in reality, the emergence of money resulted in the varied accretion of goods and land because of the differing capacities of men, leading to huge disparities in accumulated wealth. In this sense, money facilitated the entrenchment on some individual’s rights who unfortunately came to lose out on the liberty they had previously had where shares were more equitable.
With money sanctioning industrialized labor: hired laborers came into play changing this rule of property ownership. Now one adding their labor to what was common no longer granted them ownership over that property as labor was purchasable. Hired labors weren’t the chief benefactors of their own work both in terms of ownership of property or when it came to the utilization of the yield. It was those with talent, efforts, and resourcefulness for whom the yield became open for the taking, which encroached on the previously held natural rights of individuals to own what they had labored for. So individual labor didn’t matter in the same sense any longer, as at least for some it didn’t result in direct ownership of the fruits of their own