Preview

Inequality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inequality
Inequality is undoubtedly the most blatant and pressing issue that plagues society. After all, how can we possibly accept that some perpetually carry the scar of a long history of poverty that impedes them from having opportunities in life? As we find ourselves face-to-face with this despicable reality we should ask ourselves: what equality of opportunity should we aim for and what measures must be taken in order to solve this issue? John Rawls and Robert Nozick present diverging views on social equality in their books A Theory of Justice and Anarchy, State, and Utopia, respectively. Nozick, on one hand, believes that liberty is the most central good and that if a property is justly owned then social inequalities are acceptable and should thus be free of intervention. He believes that people have property rights, thereby conceding them the right to what they justly own. Rawls challenges the importance that Nozick gives to property rights, by claiming that many times property ownership stems from advantageous social positions and natural talents. With that in mind, he proposes his Second Principle and Difference Principle in order to aim at correcting the injustices that arise as a product of birth accidents. Rawls’ theory of justice represents the ideal of equality of opportunity which a just society should aim at, for it is not enough to merely have a formal liberty – effective liberty is necessary as well for there to be equal access to opportunities in society. It is important to no infringe on people’s liberties, though, while trying to bring about equality. However, it is Nozick’s liberty theory that I will be using in this paper as the one we should try to preserve, for it consists in having one’s rights respected (29) – that is, their duties and claim-rights. The only amendment I will add to Nozick’s point of view is that liberty is only justified in being restricted if by doing so in the short run it will bring about maximal liberty to everyone in the long

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Hatzenbuehler’s conception of inequalities is premised on historical injustices and oppressive regimes as well as laws. His views on social inequalities and distributive justices are highly influenced by Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory in his book entitled “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”. In the modern world, social inequalities have become a major concern for the international community. For instance, the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) requires nations to use the Core Minimum Approach in addressing social inequalities, especially those falling under the broad spectrum of social and economic rights. The effect of biases in the process of nurturing a “Virtuous Citizenry” is that they cause hostilities and anti-social behaviors like corruption that are inimical to the development of a nation.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opposing John Rawls’ difference principle is Robert Nozick, who questions the government’s responsibility to exercise the difference principle. Nozick’s believe is that the difference principle is unjust and commences his argument of a just society, through his entitlement theory, by contemplating the process of property ownership. In doing so, Nozick embraces John Locke’s position through the “Just Original Acquisition” principle. According to Locke, the “Just Original Acquisition” bases the ownership of property on two requisites in order to properly claim ownership of property. The first requisite is that the particular piece of interest must be previously unclaimed or unowned and the second requisite is that some sort of labor must be accomplished in order to properly take claim ownership of property. Upon meeting the previously mentioned requisites and respecting the Lockean proviso (leave as good as and enough for others), the ownership claim for property is considered just.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 3

    • 3187 Words
    • 13 Pages

    We have identified one of the central themes in sociology to be the question of who does what (labor) and who gets what (distribution of the surplus created through labor). The idea of private property and the social institutions that emerge to define and defend the right to private property, play a role in the development of inequality and stratification in society. The discussion of property, property rights, and inequality has a long history, filled with diverse arguments, ideas, and diagnoses. Below is a sampling of quotes capturing a range of perspectives on the subject:…

    • 3187 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are also those who argue that the mini al state is too small and dos not facilitate the redistribution of resources and as such cannot address inequalities between citizens. The too small argument follows that if some people have more wealth than others do, those who lack resources will have an unjust limit of living good lives. Nozick’s reply is that this kind of distributive justice is unjust. The resources are not initially distributes and are acquired or created by individuals who can exchange them. Therefore, any distribution by the state would be redistribution, which would violate the rights of the individuals. To replace this account of distributive justice, Nozick provides the entitlement theory where he argues that for any possession of property to be just it must have been acquired through a just means. This argument advances the position held by Locke that individuals are entitled to claim property rights in free resources when they mix the resources with their labor. The transfer of the property must also be just and voluntary. If the current property holder created the property or received the property through a just transfer then they are entitled to the property. If all the individuals in a society are entitled to the property they hold then the distribution of property is just and any forcible redistribution would be unjust. Justice does not demand redistribution but demands respecting the distribution that exists when the conditions of the entitlement theory…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Inequality

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” An act of inequity for some could result in inequality for all, unless citizens of the world do something about it. A current example of inequality for one would be how females are being treated compared to males in a variety of settings. People of color and different races are another example of people receiving unequal treatment. Throughout the world, inequality can be seen through those who are less fortunate than others. Every individual regardless of gender, race, and socioeconomic status deserves the right of freedom and justice.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A just society should be one that leads to progression and protects an individual's rights and freedoms. In this paper I will take Rawls position that we would create a more just society by creating a minimum standard of living for everyone. One of the main points presented in Nozick’s theory is that redistribution is wrong because it is unjust to steal resources that were justly earned from one person and to give it to someone else. In principle Nozick is correct that redistribution is unjust in the sense that we are taking resources from one person to give to another, however, Nozick’s view doesn’t account for the fact that people aren’t born with equal opportunity so without redistribution it results in a hierarchy that keeps increasing.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over the years America’s inequality income gap has been growing, between the rich and the poor. There are many reasons why this is happening. Andrew Carnegie, John Kenneth Galbraith and Joseph Stiglitz may agree with me, but believe there are different reasons why and how it should be dealt with. I would have to say that I agree that Galbraith’s idea is what is better for America now.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Income inequality in America has become a big issue, one that many of us hear every day; whether on the news or from our parents. But normally, we don’t hear the actual phrase used. We hear things like “the top two percent,” or, the “rich vs. the poor.” So, what is income inequality? Income inequality is defined as the difference between individuals or populations in the distribution of their assets, wealth, or income.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It provides people more than just the basic human rights, but it also provides many individual rights that are independent of what Locke and Nozick proposed. For example, everyone is guaranteed a wage in which they can live on from the government. Rawl believed that this type of economic distribution of wealth would provide a clear positioning into a just society. While the wealthy would not like the idea of losing their money, the idea of the Veil of Ignorance come into play. If the rules were decided without the preconception of how wealth distribution would affect a certain individual, it would beneficial for them to support it because they would have the possibility to benefit from the action (Revel 7.10.2).…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In today's generation so much inequality is occurring. Inequality in race, disability, gender, wealth, economics, and religious beliefs. What is inequality? Inequality is having difference in size, degree, circumstances, etc. ; lack of equality. When inequality occurs it could be very serious depending on what it is for. Inequality happens everywhere, sometimes so bad, no body realizes it. Everyone is different in what they think and or believe, and that should be exceptional to every human. But, there are also ways people live to agree with each other in. Inequality has made a difference in the way people see other people, inequality in race, disabilities, religious beliefs, economics, and religious beliefs.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition Of Inequality

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What do you think the book definition of equality is? Do you think of a math equation or equality between people? This is the definition I got from a dictionary from the school library. “e·qual·i·ty, noun, a symbolic expression of the fact that two quantities are equal; an equation.” Is that what equality means to you? What about jobs, beliefs, and racial equality? We have all these privileges because of our dedicated Veterans.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global Inequality

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When thinking of global inequality, one thinks of the racial segregation that they come across when they travel to different countries and are in the presents of different cultures and societies. It's not just racial segregation, but religious oppressions and sexist beliefs that come from various cultures and countries. In some countries it is illegal to smoke marijuana, in other's it's not; in some countries a women can not be seen standing in public without the presence of a man beside her, where in another country such a rule would be considered absurd. These laws are based on social norms and cultures, which lead to global inequalities.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays