Everyone rejected what Bertram Cates believed in for it wasn’t related to creationism. Instead, it is about how we are created through evolution. It doesn’t prove anything about putting a man on trial. Just because someone doesn’t have the same thought as one has, one does not have to be …show more content…
Everyone has the right to have their own freedom of thought. A freedom of thought is to accept what others are thinking. Creationism and Evolutionism have both different definitions. This means both cannot have a conflict. If the citizens were able to think freely, Bertram Cates wouldn’t be in jail and none of those individuals wouldn’t have sent him to trial. If the Importance of Freedom of thought has not been accepted, none of the citizens would have been able to speak their own mind. In other words, if the Butler Act has not been abolished in 1967, none of the citizens of Tennessee would have the Freedom of Thought. In conclusion, everyone has their on beliefs and one shouldn’t be punished for it. It is important to have freedom of thought for not everyone has the same ideas. As Khalil Gibran once said, “Life without freedom is like a body without a soul, and freedom without thought is like a confused spirit… Life, freedom, and thought are three in one, and are everlasting and shall never pass