The primary reason why people debate the tests are inaccurate, are because the conclusion might not be a splitting image of the person. Also, since there isn’t an exact answer it leads people to believe that maybe these test aren’t a concrete system. So are these test scientific, do they work even if there isn’t a right answer? …show more content…
To answer, a scientists said, “However, when the test was scored and interpreted, it produced a scarily accurate profile of my personality. It knew things about me that my mother didn’t"(Source A). The Rorschach tests detect things about you that only you would know. They are extremely accurate, digging down deep to show your personality. Usually the one person who knows a lot about you besides yourself is you parent, if these tests find things that your parents don’t even know about you, then they are very accurate. The tests come back with specific information about the individual who took the test. These kinds of tests are about to clearly understand and clearly analyze a person's personality just by having them answer one simple question, “what do you see?”
Furthermore, measuring somebody's thinking and understanding of something is a hard thing to do. Now with all the technology we could, but back then it would seem impossible. These tests aren’t only easy, but accurate This has been used to detect thinking disorders for years, and the personality matches the person perfectly. “Rorschach was clear that his test measured disordered thinking and this has never been disputed.” What has been disputed is the accuracy of the test, if you see the conclusion then you will see that these tests have so much information about the person that it would be like knowing them for years. The tests is accurate because it has been used for years, and it has accurately diagnosed people with thinking disorders. Those who are trying to understand a person’s emotions and what they think, would find this necessary.
These tests are a test that analyze how people feel and of they have a contemplative disorder, without the person really thinking that they are being tested.
With it being a test in mind, people with have influenced answers, or might true to outsmart the test. “ She is happily married and has recently discovered she is pregnant.” “The red things on each side look like newborn babies with umbilical cords still attached.” This girl had her child in mind while she was taking this tests, if she wasn't going to have a child then her answers would have been different. She made everything in the inkblots focus around the new baby. This shows how the inkblot test may be invalid because people's answers could be influenced, but then again everyone sees something different and she could be in a happy mindset. The whole point of this test being able to test you thinking skills, is for everyone to see something different. Although people see these things as invalid flaws of the test they really have no effect, it is the people then who are invalid because they are the ones who have to answer what they see. These tests are important to help the study of people's minds and without this simple test, people could be living with disorders. Some people who debate against the tests might say that the colored ink influences what people see; but it shouldn’t because everyone sees things differently which is what an inkblot test really is.
Ultimately, inkblot tests are easy and accurate ways to test
someone's persona. Studies show that these tests draw valid conclusions and are very exact and specific. In ways there are valid ways to debate against the system, but they have been using this system for a while and it has been detecting disordered thinking for years. The inkblots shown during a Rorschach Test accurately define someone's demeanor.