Preview

Insanity In Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Tell-Tale Heart'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
“True! -nervous-very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses-not destroyed-not dulled them.” (Poe) There are different definitions of legal insanity such as the M 'Naghten Rules which were a reaction to the acquittal in 1843 of Daniel M 'Naghten on the charge of murdering Edward Drummond, whom M’Naghten had mistaken for British Prime Minister, Robert Peel. M 'Naghten fired a pistol at the back of Peel 's secretary, Edward Drummond, who died five days later. The House of Lords asked a panel of judges, presided over by Sir Nicolas Conyngham Tindal, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, a series of hypothetical questions about the defense of insanity. The principles expounded by this …show more content…

When the tests set out by the Rules are satisfied, the accused may be adjudged "not guilty by reason of insanity" or "guilty but insane.” (Wikipedia) In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” the unnamed narrator demonstrates how easily perspective can become distorted and the question becomes is he “not guilty by reason of insanity” which he strongly denies, or is he “guilty but insane” by which he cautiously premeditates an ingenuous plan …show more content…

The resulting lack of self-knowledge makes Edgar Allan Poe’s narrator in ‘The Tell-Tale Heart’ judge the old man based on his own (the narrator’s) affections, and not the truth. The deliberate misjudgment of the other can only mirror the “blindness of the self, signifying a lack of insight.” (Magdalen) Basically, seeing the fault in others while being blind to his own shortcomings is what the narrator is expressing. He became fixated with the vulture eye of the old man and in doing so he became motivated to murder the old

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Guilty by reason of insanity: The criminal is not guilty because they do not know right from wrong.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The important second prong of the M’Naghten rule says that the person must know right from wrong. Clark would have had to have known at the time of the incident that what he was doing was wrong in order for him to be guilty of intent to murder. (Gibeaut, 2006, Vol. 92)…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ Insanity means madness; mental illness (Intermediate Dictionary, pg. 451)”. According to recent insanity plea statistics, there has been a significant increase in insanity defense cases across country. In Edgar Allan Poe’s Short story, “ The Tell Tale Heart “, the narrator is insane because he kills the old man , he gets annoyed by his own heart beat , and he was paranoid.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who can determine if a person is insane, a doctor, a lawyer, a judge, or a jury of your peers? Does any one person really know why someone acts the way they do? Legal insanity is not knowing whether the act you committed was wrong or right. Leon Czolgosz assassinated President William McKinley. Of all the Presidential assassinations, McKinley’s had the most dangerously political movement. This assassination was followed by Theodore Roosevelt taking over the Presidency of the United States. In the 1900’s, the emergence of medicine and law had just began. It was not until the late 1880’s that courts even considered expert witness and expert testimony. Courts began to allow doctors to testify on their medical opinions of defendants they did not treat until after the crimes were committed. The alienist (as mental doctors were called during this time) wanted Leon Czologsz to be criminally insane. His insanity would have made for an easier trial.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good morning your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today is the day that the defendant in Edgar Allen Poe’s “ The Tell-Tale Heart” is proven to be insane; using the McNaughton rule the caretaker should be placed in a state hospital for the criminally insane. The McNaughton is a standard to be applied by the jury, after hearing medical testimony from prosecution and defense experts, It states that a presumption of sanity, unless the defense proved otherwise.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are considered insane if a mental disorder stops you from managing matters or obeying the law. John Hinckley’s verdict of Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity created a big commotion among the public. Many felt that the verdict was being used as a means for criminals to avoid their prison sentence, and to await their time in a prison facility (Simon, and Aaronson, 1988).…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One legal standard used to determine whether or not a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” as per the M 'Naghten Rule is that because of their mental illness they either did not know what they were doing was wrong or knew it was wrong but could not control their actions (“enotes.com”)…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper will talk about the meaning of the insanity defense. It will also include the definition of the words not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and guilty but mentally ill (GBMI). Will answer question how insanity and psychology’s role in the definition. As well as how frequently is the insanity defense is used and how successful it is. In addition to the common beliefs about the insanity defense and their accuracy. For example, it will discuss some of the concerns or major criticisms about the insanity defense and the legitimacy to those concerns.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What exactly is the official court definition of legally insane? Criminal Law and Court Procedures author, Melroy B. Hutnick states that there are three basic rules that are commonly given consideration in deciding an individual's sanity. The first rule, M'Naghten's Rule states:" If at the time of committing the act, the defendant was laboring under such a defect of reason from disease of the mind as not to know the nature and the quality of the act, but did not know that what he was doing was wrong, he is legally insane and not responsible for his acts. This rule is often referred to as the Right-Wrong Test." The second rule, known as Durham's Rule, states: "An accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect." Last, the Irresistible Impulse Rule states: "If by reason of a mental disease, the accused has so far lost his power to choose between right and wrong that he was unable to avoid doing the act in question, he is insane" (Hutnick 23). What does all of this mean? People can commit crimes yet not be held accountable for those crimes if they are found to be insane.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Disease of the mind”, is any illness, disorder, or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning. It excludes temporary conditions of alcohol, drugs, hysteria or concussion. People use this as an excuse to criminal liability because mental illness is covered under section 16 of the Criminal Code. The insanity defense prevents a mentally-incapacitated person from being criminally punished. In order to plea insanity, the courts provide a variety of legal test to help determine the mental state of the offender. The most used test is the M’Naghten rule; which states that an offender is insane if mental illness prevents them from knowing the difference between right and wrong. Another test that states like to use is the “irresistible impulse” test. This test states that “If the defendant is suffering from a mental disease that prevents control of personal conduct, he or she may be adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity, even if he or she knows the difference between right and wrong.” Pleading insanity is by no means a “get out of jail free” card. Most offenders that are found not guilty because of insanity are sent to a mental health institution. They are required to be there for a long period of time, most spend longer in the institution than they would have spent in prison if they had been found…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Plea

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the 18th century, the legal standards for the insanity defense were varied. Some courts looked to whether the defendant could distinguish between good and evil, while others asked whether the defendant "did not know what he did." By the 19th century, it was generally accepted that insanity was a question of fact, which was left to the jury to decide.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Commitment

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A number of tests have been used to help the courts make decisions to find if a person is sane to stand trial. One test is the M 'Naghten test of insanity, also called the (right-wrong test). The person was not criminally responsible if at the time of the crime, that he or she did not know that what they were doing was wrong or what the nature of the act was. A jury is required to answer two questions about the evidence they heard. One is his she or she didn 't know what they were doing when he or she committed the crime. Two was if the defendant understood that his or her actions were wrong. This test had many faults with it and people stopped using it to prove weather a person was insane or sane. The Irresistible impulse test was used as a alternative to the M 'Naghten test. This test was a theory based on the fact that the mental disease could force a person to act against their own will, and a person could be driven by a irresistible impulse. This had many faults also but was used until around the 1950 's when the Durham test came into play. This was a test that asked two questions of the jury, one did the defendant have a mental disease or defect? And if so, was the disease or defect the reason for the crime? The jury had to come back with both answers yes to give the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. In the 1970 's this was a test no longer used and the…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics