Criminal Commitment
First, I want to tell you what is criminal commitment. Its a legal procedure by which a person who is found not guilt of a crime by reason of insanity must be confined in a psychiatric hospital or facility. In order to become criminal committed a person must stand trial and the trier of the fact (jury) must determine weather the person is not guilty by reason of insanity. After that person is found not guilty by reason of insanity they are acquitted of the offense they are charged with and may not be considered a person charged with a criminal offense .
A number of tests have been used to help the courts make decisions to find if a person is sane to stand trial. One test is the M 'Naghten test of insanity, also called the (right-wrong test). The person was not criminally responsible if at the time of the crime, that he or she did not know that what they were doing was wrong or what the nature of the act was. A jury is required to answer two questions about the evidence they heard. One is his she or she didn 't know what they were doing when he or she committed the crime. Two was if the defendant understood that his or her actions were wrong. This test had many faults with it and people stopped using it to prove weather a person was insane or sane. The Irresistible impulse test was used as a alternative to the M 'Naghten test. This test was a theory based on the fact that the mental disease could force a person to act against their own will, and a person could be driven by a irresistible impulse. This had many faults also but was used until around the 1950 's when the Durham test came into play. This was a test that asked two questions of the jury, one did the defendant have a mental disease or defect? And if so, was the disease or defect the reason for the crime? The jury had to come back with both answers yes to give the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. In the 1970 's this was a test no longer used and the American Law Institute test was adopted. This test was based on two test that I have explained the M 'Naghten and the Irresistible Impulse test. Many states do not have a insanity defense at all. They make you go to jail in normal population without any help even if you are mentally insane. Some states acquit the person of all offenses if the jury comes back with the not guilty by reason of insanity. Here in Maryland we do not have the insanity as a defense, we have the not criminally responsible. It works like this, you go to trial you are found not criminally responsible because of a mental disorder. Then you are sent to a state ran hospital for adleast 45 days. Now the patient has the burden of proof to show that he or she is not a danger to his/herself or anyone else or a persons property The patient may be released or retained with or with out any conditions. The law judge has to make a recommendation to the circuit court judge. Who was the judge in his or her case and they have the say weather they have had all the mental help they needed to become a citizen again. Sometimes there are conditions on release and if the person fails to met the conditions they have to go to court and have another hearing to see if they need to be back in the hospital for treatment.
I have found that all states differ on this matter what one state dose another will not due. This has made me go crazy to find information about this criminally committed state. there are many people in the system today that have been found to fit under this criminally committed criteria like John H Hinckley Jr., David Berkowitz, Herbert Mullin who heard his father 's voice in his head, telling him to kill someone for him. This man was convinced he was preventing earthquakes and tidal waves by killing people. These people like Ted Bundy all had severe mental problems but do you think they should be helped or not helped. Sometimes I think that help is out their before they do a crime but can they find it? I really don 't know. Did these people even know that they were sick? I think the court system still has room for improvement on this matter.
I hope what I wrote about helps, I was all over the place with this.
WORKS CITED
WWW.CrimeLibrary.com/Serial_killers/notorious/Tick/Insane_8.html?sect=19
Http://www.oah.state.md.us
Http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/doc/cr/content/htm/cr.001.00.000046.htm
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d029.htm
Laws of Evidence BY: Thomas Buckles
Criminal Law 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson
Cited: WWW.CrimeLibrary.com/Serial_killers/notorious/Tick/Insane_8.html?sect=19 Http://www.oah.state.md.us Http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/doc/cr/content/htm/cr.001.00.000046.htm http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d029.htm Laws of Evidence BY: Thomas Buckles Criminal Law 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Three medical experts concluded that Miller satisfied the MNaughten insanity test during the period in which he stabbed Goring. The test for insanity had been used in Nevada since 1889. State v. Lewis, 20 Nev.333, 22 P.241 (1889). The defense used the MNaughten test to show that the defendant did not understand his actions and could not tell the difference between right and wrong. During the close of evidence in the trial the district court instructed the jury to determine if Miller was legally insane when he killed…
- 987 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…
- 1368 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The collection and application of evidence have become essential to criminal investigations and prosecutions. Clear and convincing evidence could prove a crime that has been committed, establish key elements of a crime, target a suspect and someone associated with a crime, exonerate the innocent, corroborate a victim’s testimony, and assist in establishing the facts of what occurred (McEwen). Although evidence plays a significant role in prosecutions, there are still many cases involving misuse of evidence, which results in the conviction of an innocent person. In the case of “Trial by Fire,” due to the misuse of evidence by the fire investigators, the State of Texas wrongfully executed Cameron Todd Willingham who was convicted of murdering…
- 519 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…
- 1049 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
You are considered insane if a mental disorder stops you from managing matters or obeying the law. John Hinckley’s verdict of Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity created a big commotion among the public. Many felt that the verdict was being used as a means for criminals to avoid their prison sentence, and to await their time in a prison facility (Simon, and Aaronson, 1988).…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Unlike the M’Naghten test, the ALI has a volitional prong as well. Volitional is saying you know it's wrong, you still commit it because you have to not by free choice. Volition tests have ways of seeing if they were insane by three distinguishing factors: was the crime premeditated, did they have the capacity to make choices, and did they think about getting caught. The volitional prong has different mental disorders closely tied including Bipolar 2 and paraphilias that could prohibit one’s free choice. In conclusion, the ALI is a lot less strict than the two other types of tests, but do incorporate both cognitive and volitional prongs.…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to our textbook, Wrightman’s Psychology and the Legal System, M’Naghten had paranoid delusions. He believed that the Prime Minister, Robert Peel, was aligned with the Tory Party in a conspiracy against him. He tried to run, but when that didn’t do the trick, he returned and stalked the Prime Minister. He later shot a man, who he believed to be the Prime Minister, but he actually killed the private security of the British Prime Minister. He was charged with murder, but after a couple of days of medical experts testifying, he was found not guilty by reasons of insanity (NGRI). (Greene & Heilbrun, 2011 pg.210) Our text describes the M’Naghten rule as “The jury ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be…
- 1349 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…
- 1668 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The law and legal definition of civil commitment refers to, “the jailing of a person for debt or nonpayment of alimony or the confinement of an insane person, alcoholic, or drug addict for treatment or protection or the commitment of a person under civil arrest” ("Civil Commitment Law & Legal Definition," 2001- 2014). In the USA laws pertaining to civil commitments vary dependent upon what the individual statutes and laws pertaining to civil commitment are in the State involved (Mrad, D., Watson, C. 2011). For example, in Minnesota, “Mental Health has the obligation of committing persons to treatment…
- 1209 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In recent years, Iowa has had two successful insanity defense cases, successful as in the defendant got what he wanted, not guilty. In both cases, they admitted to the murder, and gave substitutions for why they acted out. The Cody Metzker-Madsen case was the first to occur, and he stated that him and his foster brother were playing, and Cody got into “his own world” and in it, his foster brother transformed into a goblin king that Cody needed to destroy (Rodgers, Grant.). Cody ended up drowning the little boy, thus pleading guilty, but the judge casted him as innocent. In insanity defense cases, the defendant pleads innocent based on the fact that they were not psychologically stable at the time. When on trial, Cody denied his violent acts, and only talked about the goblin. In his past, he has had been known to lie, fantasize, and suffer from epilepsy. When all the information was given to the public, most of the community felt that the trial was fair, and Cody got what he needed. Cody did not go to a mental health institution, but somehow was found innocent, and sent to a low grade prison. If he was innocent by reason of insanity, why wasn’t he sent to and actual institution, where he could get the appropriate…
- 1001 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The insanity defense is a controversial legal defense which states that a defendant should not be found culpable of a crime on the basis of insanity. The main factor that makes this defense so controversial is the difficulty in interpreting what exactly should be defined as insanity. To add the distortion, many different states also have completely different rules and attitudes towards the insanity defense. Many misconceptions about the insanity defense exist throughout society. For starters, the term insanity is strictly a legal term, not a psychological or medical term. Although various movies and television shows portray the insanity defense as a commonly used and successful defense, the opposite is true in reality. Even though statistics…
- 432 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
And often the cases involving an insanity plea gets the most attention because they involve crime that are bizarre within themselves. On February 22, 2016 an article name “Maryland Mom Found Not Responsible in Boy Death in Swing” was release. This article shares with us that Simms was found not responsible in her son’s death. Simms was found pushing her son in a park swing for 40 hours until he died from hypothermia and dehydration. “She was then ruled not criminally responsible, Maryland's equivalent to not guilty by reason of insanity.”(Ahn) She was later found not responsible since she was declare to have schizophrenia. She was ruled not to be a danger to the community and was freed on a conditional release.…
- 997 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The principles include if they do not understand the consequences of their conduct, can not tell if their conduct is wrong, and is not able to control their conduct (Gaines & Miller p. 81). To prove insanity there are a series of test that can be done, in order to classify someone as insane. Those test include include the M’Naghten rule, the Substantial- Capacity test, and the Irresistible-impulse test. Criminals can also be found guilty, but mentally ill. The insanity defense is rarely used, because it is hard to prove that someone is actually insane. It also can come down to the jury, to decide whether or not the defendant is actually mentally ill(Gaines & Miller p. 82). There have been cases where people use the insanity defense, because of their mental illness. Some cases that used the insanity defense and were successful were Eddie Routh, and Andrea Yates. The insanity defense did not work for Andrew Goldstein, Jonathan…
- 1581 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…
- 842 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays