Preview

Essay On Volitional Prongs

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Volitional Prongs
Unlike the M’Naghten test, the ALI has a volitional prong as well. Volitional is saying you know it's wrong, you still commit it because you have to not by free choice. Volition tests have ways of seeing if they were insane by three distinguishing factors: was the crime premeditated, did they have the capacity to make choices, and did they think about getting caught. The volitional prong has different mental disorders closely tied including Bipolar 2 and paraphilias that could prohibit one’s free choice. In conclusion, the ALI is a lot less strict than the two other types of tests, but do incorporate both cognitive and volitional prongs.
Applied Analysis

The defendant does not meet the standard for legal insanity in Delaware, using the
…show more content…

Howard states that he did know he was raping Stacy and he admitted he knew rape was wrong to his cellmate. He knew it was wrong because he drove her away from the scene to rape her and he admitted it to the cops when he got caught. In some respects, he was covering up the act of driving away from where he grabbed her. He was taking a protective measure by driving into an alley to then rape her instead of raping her at the gas station in front of the strangers. Stacy was not a random person, he knew what he was doing. He was fantasizing about Stacy for weeks before and he made his move. He sexualized Stacy by going to the strip clubs and comparing those girls to her. When the opportunity came about to sexually assault, he took his chance and he knew exactly what he was doing. Howard was not in a mental state of psychosis, he knew was going on, he just acted impulsively. There was no crazy reason why Howard attacked Stacy except that he wanted to and has been dreaming about her for weeks before. In conclusion, Howard did not pass the cognitive prong because you knew what he was doing and he made some precautionary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Three medical experts concluded that Miller satisfied the MNaughten insanity test during the period in which he stabbed Goring. The test for insanity had been used in Nevada since 1889. State v. Lewis, 20 Nev.333, 22 P.241 (1889). The defense used the MNaughten test to show that the defendant did not understand his actions and could not tell the difference between right and wrong. During the close of evidence in the trial the district court instructed the jury to determine if Miller was legally insane when he killed…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arrington (2001) argues that advertising does not manipulate people in ways that undermine their autonomy. He claims that advertising merely employs marketing techniques that create an association of products with people’s “independent needs and desires that they already have and not creating those basic desires”. Arrington suggests that our culture and social environments is the source of our desires. The common hierarchical models of autonomy (Frankfurt, 1988; Dworkin, 1976), suggest that autonomy is comprised of first-order desires, which fulfils our second-order desires. Arrington explains that an autonomous desire is one that we endorse via a second-order desire. To understand Arrington’s point that “autonomous first order desires are…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My personal thoughts after taking the first test I was a little skeptical on how they come up with the results. The test was a bit odd to me. While taking the test, I started to pick up on a pattern while picking dark skinned faces with bad words and light skinned faces with good words and vice versa. I am sure many other people have picked up on it too. My only problem with the test is that when you figure out the pattern it can definitely alter the results at the end and come up with biases that are not true. Though I think the IAT is a useful and very successful tool on finding hidden biases and attitudes, in my opinion there are ways to trick the test.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theodore took the plea bargain that the prosecution offered just to keep the status about his mental health out. It states by some equally critical issue that defendant’s will go to great links to keep that hidden this presents a great challenge for the legal team dealing with a defendant that is mentally ill and does not agree. It also mentions the Dusky standard as a guideline to follow in judging competency that up held by the courts. It also states the “two-prong standard, but states varied in adopting the explicit-rationality component. The American Academy of Psychiatry and the law (AAPL) Practice Guideline on Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial.” Reisner, D., Andrew, Piel, Jennifer, & Makey, Miller Competency to Stand Trail and Defendants Who Lack Insight into Their Mental Illness Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online March 2013, 41(1) 85-91; www.jaapl.org/content/41/1/85 Then it goes on inform read about waiving the insanity defense. State that in the following jurisdictions Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming allows the court’s authority to enlist the insanity defense on a criminal…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Aurora Shooting

    • 2481 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 17 ]. Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, Pub. L. No 98-473, 98 Stat. 2067 (1999)…

    • 2481 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Self-Determination Theory

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theoretical frameworks that will be utilized in this study are the Self Determination theory (STD) and the Communication Privacy Management (CPM) theories. Combination of these two theories is effective to understand the pregnant women’s behaviour towards UI. This is because self-determination and communication skill is importance to determine the decision making with regards to self-motivation to look for disease treatment.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mental illness is defined as “Any of various conditions characterized by impairment of an individual’s normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by social, psychological, biochemical, genetic, or other factors, such as infection or head trauma” (thefreedictionary.com). A defendant charged with a crime may present the court with an insanity plea. Upon application of the insanity plea, the defendant must be psychologically evaluated. A common test that is used for this evaluation is called the M’Naghten rules. These rules state that “it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or as not to know that what he was doing was wrong” (bailii.org). In using this defence the accused may receive a verdict of “guilty but mentally ill,” which means the accused party may still receive the death penalty. It is extremely rare that an individual using the insanity plea defence gets acquitted.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts of the case are as follow; “on May 8, 1993, John Kilioi Miller stabbed to death Robyn Goring, whom he shared an apartment with along with their children. He was discovered by an officer who also lived in the same apartment complex. She had heard a loud noise which took her to the discovery of the horrible crime that had just took place. The minute the officer arrived Miller replied, “I lost it,” and at the same time apologizing for what he had done. She then observed the body of Goring which was lying on the kitchen floor with a knife in her body. It was later sought by the medical examiner that there where forty-two stab wounds in Goring. Miller gave a voluntary statement to police about the incident.”…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self Determination Theory

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why are some people highly motivated than others? I think about this question often because I have some coworkers that are driven like myself whereas others lack ambition. I specifically chose articles that focused on psychological needs and individual differences within an organization because I wanted to understand the motives behind my behavior as well as the behavior of coworkers. In addition to this, I wanted to understand and know from a manager's perspective on how to shape a worker's attitude to enhance job satisfaction. Of course, the above statements have puzzled motivational scholars, psychologists, and individuals such as myself for many years, but I will examine these concerns in this paper.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory that best applies to my behavior change, is the self determination theory. The self determination theory looks at motivation and personality and combines aspects of behavioral self regulation as well as personality development (Ryan & Deci, 2000). It takes into account the psychological needs of the person, and also looks at a combination of these factors in order to determine the type of motivation a person has. According to Ryan and Deci, there are three needs that need to be met for a person to feel a sense of wellbeing, growth and development (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Those needs are: a need for autonomy, a need for competence and a need for relatedness. I felt that the self determination theory best applied to my behavior change because in order for me to change my sleeping habits, I first had to identify what my motivation was and why I was making the change. I also had to make sure that the three psychological needs were met with my behavior change or the change would be unlikely to happen.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Disease of the mind”, is any illness, disorder, or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning. It excludes temporary conditions of alcohol, drugs, hysteria or concussion. People use this as an excuse to criminal liability because mental illness is covered under section 16 of the Criminal Code. The insanity defense prevents a mentally-incapacitated person from being criminally punished. In order to plea insanity, the courts provide a variety of legal test to help determine the mental state of the offender. The most used test is the M’Naghten rule; which states that an offender is insane if mental illness prevents them from knowing the difference between right and wrong. Another test that states like to use is the “irresistible impulse” test. This test states that “If the defendant is suffering from a mental disease that prevents control of personal conduct, he or she may be adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity, even if he or she knows the difference between right and wrong.” Pleading insanity is by no means a “get out of jail free” card. Most offenders that are found not guilty because of insanity are sent to a mental health institution. They are required to be there for a long period of time, most spend longer in the institution than they would have spent in prison if they had been found…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free will is clearly an ontological issue, but it is rooted in the metaphysical nature of reality. We should study free will because it is theologically significant and because many people assume a particular definition of free will that is incorrect. Studying free will is challenging because it is not defined in Scripture. Further, it is complex because it connects too many other larger theological issues; it intersects with philosophy, historical theology, and systematic theology. At the outset, it is necessary to get a clear understanding of what exactly "free will" is. A being has free will if given all other causal factors in the universe it nevertheless possesses the ability to choose more than one thing. The word freedom…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The narrator planned out the murder long before he did it. As he was about to explain how he completed his task, he sounded quite proud. He did make sure to point out that he is not mad and did what he thought was right. “If you still think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body.” He remembered all of the things he did the night of the crime. Signs of a mental illness are memory loss. He must be sane if he could clearly state what happened without hesitation. The narrator does not seem one hundred percent trustworthy though. He could be seen as mental for this…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays