Into The Wild Jon Krakauer Analysis
Many people decide to live their life in lonely, but only some of them select to live in the wild. The book, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer and Everett Ruess by W.L. Rusho describes strong interesting colorful experience of two different person’s journey they went on. From the book Into the Wild the author stated the journey of Christopher McCandless. Into the Wild book does not starts with the birth of Christopher McCandless nor with the beginning of the journey that the book will indicate, but with an essential point late in Christopher McCandless's journey through the American West and his final meeting with other person before he enters the Alaskan wilderness. Similarly, the book Everett Ruess describes a journey of daring young explorer,
…show more content…
Davis Gulch contains a rock sculpture left behind by the Anasazi people, as well as a sculpture left behind by a young man named Everett Ruess, who is like Christopher McCandless, disappeared into the wilderness of Utah. Krakauer then compared the Ruess’s life and the engage in painful effort and experience that brought him to Davis Gulch, where he left a final dedication of his name before disappearing. Ruess was born in 1914 to a middle-class family that lived primarily in Southern California and after a short term in college, he started working with photographer Edward Weston, built friendships with California artists, and then set out to live as a person who travels from place to place on foot in search of wilderness and natural beauty. Krakauer includes a portion from Ruess’s agreement in which he describes the attraction of the lonely life. He urges and requests to his contributors that they would not be able to understand how well and exciting it is to find the wilderness. Krakauer states relationship between Ruess’s concern for absence of personal safety and security with McCandless’s safety and security. Krakauer then uses Ruess’s letters to find his pathway from community in California to Davis Gulch in Utah. However, Ruess was assumed to be in Marble Canyon, Arizona but he never arrived there and that concerns his parents to create a search on him in March 1935. Unfortunately, Ruess never been discovered and the appealing expectations remains constant, that he got hurt and died while hiking in the canyon or drowned, but some people evidently support that they had seen and met
Davis Gulch contains a rock sculpture left behind by the Anasazi people, as well as a sculpture left behind by a young man named Everett Ruess, who is like Christopher McCandless, disappeared into the wilderness of Utah. Krakauer then compared the Ruess’s life and the engage in painful effort and experience that brought him to Davis Gulch, where he left a final dedication of his name before disappearing. Ruess was born in 1914 to a middle-class family that lived primarily in Southern California and after a short term in college, he started working with photographer Edward Weston, built friendships with California artists, and then set out to live as a person who travels from place to place on foot in search of wilderness and natural beauty. Krakauer includes a portion from Ruess’s agreement in which he describes the attraction of the lonely life. He urges and requests to his contributors that they would not be able to understand how well and exciting it is to find the wilderness. Krakauer states relationship between Ruess’s concern for absence of personal safety and security with McCandless’s safety and security. Krakauer then uses Ruess’s letters to find his pathway from community in California to Davis Gulch in Utah. However, Ruess was assumed to be in Marble Canyon, Arizona but he never arrived there and that concerns his parents to create a search on him in March 1935. Unfortunately, Ruess never been discovered and the appealing expectations remains constant, that he got hurt and died while hiking in the canyon or drowned, but some people evidently support that they had seen and met