Preview

Into The Wild Movie Vs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Into The Wild Movie Vs
Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer is a story about the life of Chris McCandless. After graduating with honors from Emory University in 1990, Chris donated his entire savings of twenty-four thousand dollars to charity. In doing, he set off to pursue his life long dream of living off the land in the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless ended up making it to Alaska and finding an old abandoned bus. Three months later McCandless decided he should go home. When he got to the point he needed to cross the river, the current was too strong, so he was trapped. He ended up living in the bus for a total of 113 days and then dying. Both the movie and book of Into the Wild explore the adventure that Chris McCandless takes, while the book focuses on comparing Chris to other people and the relationships he had, the movie focuses specifically on the life story and adventure of Chris McCandless, therefore the movie is better than the book.

The number one thing I noticed in the movie that was different in the book is that Carine (his sister) tells the entire story. During the book though, the narrator position changes between interviewers and people he met. I think that by having Carine tell the story, the movie was a little more understandable. The book was a little complex because it is hard to determine who is telling the story.

One thing the director did that really stood out to me was where he set the theme. Along the journey McCandless goes to a handful of places. Instead of filming in one place, the director traveled all over the US and filmed everywhere McCandless went.

My favorite thing that the director changed was how he added captions. The director also divided the movie into chapters. I enjoyed how he displayed quotes that McCandless would read or write on the screen. For example, when they would read one of McCandless’s journal entries they would display it on the screen for you to read along.

In the film I am glad that the director made sure to include the adventures

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first noticeable major difference is how the story is told. In the novel, Jon Krakauer writes from his own point of view, providing his own input and opinions on McCandless, while the film is told in his sister’s point of view; she is scarcely mentioned in the novel, aside from the fact that Chris was very fond of her. The shift in narrators in a way limits the amount of information that can be delivered to the audience. Though the narration by Chris’s sister adds a more…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel “Into The Wild” written by Jon Krakauer describes a young man in various ways. Just as any normal person, there are negative and positive aspects. Chris McCandless was seen as someone who threw his life away or even as an inspiration. After graduating from college, he donated all his savings, burned his pocket money, disappeared and was soon found dead, two years later in Alaska. He was so passionate about life, self assured of succeeding his journey and to many he was trustworthy.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was more detail in the film than the book. Most books have a lot of detail. Especially conversations and emotions. They explain how the character feels and explain what the setting is like. In the film, it also had much detail. It shows most of how the character(s) gets place to place. When reading a book, you use your imagination and in a film you can watch in. For instince, in the book, it didn't explain how Rainsford escaped from place to place. In a new chapter, he would be in a different area and it didn't describe what he did to get there. In the film, Rainsford tricked General Zaroff and got back to safety. It…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The settings I imagined while reading the book were very different from what I saw in the movie. Some of the characters such as Kenny and Byron were shorter than I imagined, but Joetta was taller than I imagined her and Grandma Sands looked very different than I imagined. I thought she would be tiny, really old looking, and very mean. She wasn’t really any of those. The settings were very different such as the church and the Watsons house. I thought they would be more dated. Their house wasn’t modern, but wasn’t as old as I imagined from the context clues in the book. Overall I liked the movie better because it had more information about racism and I felt I learned more about it. I think I would like the movie even better if it had Rufus as a character, but it was still a great…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Into the Wild it explains a true story that had changed the the lives of many. A young man who all he wanted was to escape society and get away from the world. His life did end shortly after his disappearance. But that does not mean he did not live his life to the fullest. Jon Krakauer the author of the book Into the Wild describes Chris McCandless faults and traits. Chris is an intelligent guy but he finds a new meaning for life and wants to go discover it. He didn't have any contact with his parents but was contacting his sister carrie. Krakauer does a tremendous job of interviewing everyone who had anything to do with McCandless from his parents, when he grew up, to the people who found his body in the abandoned bus in Alaska.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is about a young man named Chris McCandless who left his old life behind to hitchhike across America. He burned the money in his pockets and abandoned his car in the desert. Krakauer tells the story of Chris’s journey to Alaska where he was found dead in an abandoned bus, and much more. Chris McCandless’s story is one of courage and passion; however, it also gives the impression that he was irresponsible and ungrateful. He had many character traits that one would both admire and detest.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book and the movie have differences too. An example is when Lennie rips the girl’s dress,in the book he rips in when they were in town and in the movie he rips it in a field. Another example is at the end of the movie George is in a train and at the end of the book he is still at the place where he works. In the movie George throws Lennie’s mouse…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Book Into the Wild some people think that Chris Mccandless was brave, or mentally ill or he was dumb, but Chris was none of these Chris was really a tragic hero, this micro argument will explain how Chris Mccandless fits the Tragic hero traits and what actions led Chris to his fate .…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nick Jans a schoolteacher and alaskan hunter, said that “McCandless was hardly unique; there's quite a few of these guys hanging around state, so much alike that they are almost a collective cliché. The only difference is that McCandless ended up dead,with the story of his dumbassedness splashed across the media...McCandless is, finally, just a 20th-century burlesque of london's protagonist, who freezes because he ignores advice and commits big time hubris”(pg 71-72). Chris is a fool knowingly going out to the most unforgiving,coldest, and most relentless places in the world. He makes the most simplest but most damaging mistakes, becoming just like the predecessors before him like london, like london's protagonist he mirrored the same image bestowed on the book and like a fly was hooked and couldn't escape,chris sought to copy that image and make it his own. Chris went to the depths of the most unforgiving isolated remote places and was able to turn a blind eye and be an arrogant person who thinks he can take the most brutal environment without any preparation, or knowledge of the ferocity the wild has,he greatly underestimated the wild thinking he can go in and out without anything but the bag on his back and luck by his side and forgetting the most important things like a compass or map or his common…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think it goes without saying that Bobo's bad news is by far the most dramatic scene in the motion picture. Although it was also very good in the book I believe the film portrayed the emotion of despair better through the facial reactions of the actors. Of the few changes in the film none of them really bothered me. In fact I'm glad the Ms. Johnson seen was cut. The point was nagging and disruptive to the flow of the story. I do…

    • 1857 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    True Grit: John Wayne

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I thought the movie was pretty well directed. It moved along quite well. It had great action scenes. I liked the location of the movie and the actor were second to none. The setting was beautiful and really brought out the western theme of the movie. I like how they sowed the rivalry of the Texas…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Man

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One major difference between the book and the movie are the scenes. One example is the scene in the barn when George took the mule in there to fix its hoof. This scene doesn’t happen in the book because the author spent a lot more time describing Curly’s wife’s personality, so it was easier to visualize. I think this scene is necessary for the movie because it helps you better understand Curly’s wife. Another scene is when the book describes George sharing his beans with Lennie, and also pulls out two spoons one for himself and one for Lennie, which shows that George cares about him and is planning to have a future together. This scene was not included in the movie and I think that was not a good idea. This scene would have perfectly fit into the storyline and showed George’s feelings toward Lennie. Another difference in the scenes is the one where Crooks, Candy, and Lennie are gathered in Crook’s room. Curly’s wife arrives and Crooks has the nerve to stand up to her and she gets mad at Crooks and threatens to have him hanged and no one would object. Crooks then shuts up and lets her do what she wants. This scene should have been in the movie, but was not. I think not including this scene was a bad idea because it does not show Curly’s wife’s true nature.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where the Spirit Lives

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1)The very first scene to me was very interesting. This is when the man tries to lure the children into the plane by singing and dancing. He made everything seem like it was going to be fun and easy for the children, but it clearly was not. I’m sure back when they were bringing children to the school they lied a lot about what the school was going to be like.…

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people dream at one time or another of leaving everything behind and starting over, searching for inner strengths. When Into the Wild was released on September 21st, 2007, based on the nonfiction book written by Jon Krakauer. Directed by Sean Penn, this movie shows us the gripping true story of Chris McCandless, played by Emile Hirsch, as he leaves his privileged life behind to embark on a quest for adventure and truth. The film is set in the early 1990’s and follows Chris as he graduates from Emory University, travels across the country, and reaches his dream destination in the Alaskan wilderness. In this drama, Chris meets many different people whom enrich and impact Chris’ life more than money or success ever could.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bresson Director Critique

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the past two weeks we have watched two films directed by Robert Bresson. In both films it was brought to my attention the Bresson’s technique eliminates the idea of “beauty shots.” He doesn’t use fancy effects or make up for the actors. They are simple and plain both in A Man Escaped and Pickpocket. Bresson doesn’t use dramatic zooms to draw attention. I felt that Bresson was looking to create more of a reality, and I find this admirable. Many directors prefer to use fancy effects feeling as though that will enhance the film. He wanted to enhance his film with the script as opposed to effects. However, what confused me was when Bresson tried to make it seem as though his characters were thinking in their own head. I sometimes would be unsure if he wanted the characters to seem as though they were going crazy or if he just simply wanted to expose them thinking in their own minds.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays