Moral dimension of U.S. nuclear weapons policy held prominent place in International relations during the Cold War….…
Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…
Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…
I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…
The advent of nuclear weapons dawned a new and terrifying era in human history. The destructive power of the atomic bomb, demonstrated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ushered in a global climate of fear. Emerging from the rubble of the Second World War, the U.S. and Soviet Union became the two most dominant economic, political, and military superpowers in the global arena. Upholding fundamental ideological differences, the U.S. and Soviet Union became entrenched in their respective camps of capitalism and communism. Having acquired nuclear weapons, and illustrated their ability to use them, the U.S challenged the Soviet Union’s military might. The Soviet Union promptly accepted this challenge by successfully acquiring nuclear capabilities on par with the U.S. In effect, a nuclear arms race ensued and the Cold War began. Fear of nuclear annihilation ultimately swept across the globe and into the homes of American citizens.…
In the first week of August 1945, the world saw the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare. America’s use of the atomic bombs on Japan, resulted in the death of over 130,000 people and caused unpredicted effects on physical health. In relation today we face ongoing issues of terrorism and the possibility of dirty bombs being deployed in the U.S. The problem is the U.S. government has an inadequate system for preventing the wrong…
The nuclear resources of the United States and the Soviet Union are larger, better equipped, and deadlier than at any other time in history. This incisive book contends that the superpowers, while exhibiting…
Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…
Although the Cold War had many negative influences on global society, it also helped to create a stable political world, as evidenced by the fact that during the Cold War era, civil wars, nationalistic uprisings, and ethnic cleansings were almost non-existent. As well, the world economic situation was subsequently greatly improved by the military build-up caused by the Cold War. The implementation of the American "Marshall Plan" and the Communist "Molotov Plan", the nuclear arms race, and the global military build-up all served to create global political stability and economic prosperity.…
Weapons of Mass Destruction and World War III are fears that citizens around the world are still experiencing today. However, World War III would differ from every other war because currently, multiple nations have nuclear capabilities. The use of these types of weapons goes back to World War II, when the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These attacks showed the power and devastation bombs like this could cause. Following World War II, the Cold War began. This was…
The title itself, “Atomic Bomb and the Origins of the Cold War,” simply depicts the true cause of this international standstill. Although the writers introduce the audience to the underlying background behind this war, such as increasing political tension between a soon-to-be-called Anglo-American alliance and the U.S.S.R during and previous to World War II, the main focus of this composition is exemplified by the impact which the atomic bomb had on establishing an international control or world order. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt hoped to implement this international world order, founded on principles that would uphold the idea of international atomic control and safety.…
Confronting Iran explains Iranian- U.S. relations from the early 1950’s when the Mosaddeq Coup (1953) occurred until present day relations involving nuclear politics. Ali Ansari makes it clear that conflict has always been at the forefront of these two nations history and in the conclusion Ansari says “The cultural structure of their relationship is such that it encourages conflict (Page 241).” From Carter all the way to Bush, Ansari feels that U.S. presidents have failed at their goal of negotiating with Iranians, and for some of these presidents they lost their subsequent election in part because of their failings. Carter had the Iranian hostage crisis, Reagan had the Iran-Contra scandal, George H. W. Bush had allegations of secret meetings…
Regardless of General Grove’s speech to the world in 1962 that the use of the world’s most destructive weapon was completely justified, there are still many main factors which were available to the United States and its allies. This marked the birth of the nuclear age which was to last for decades to come. It brought death and destruction…
The enduring US-Iran nuclear standoff is based essentially on the shared ideas and narratives which correspond to their suspicion of each other. The ideas are reinforced and become self-assertive on the basis of cultural differences and historical experiences. The interests and threats are defined and are narratives based on these shared understandings. It is important to understand how the ideas shape the decision making process and ultimately the foreign…
The President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stated in one of his speeches that “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury,”. This bellicose statement is extremely significant and one that should not be dismissed or ignored. America is quite open with the fact that it recognizes Israel as a country and looks upon Israel as its biggest ally in the Middle East . America clearly fits into the category of one of the countries that in Mahmoud Ahmadinejad words, “will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation”. Many believe the concept of Iran destroying America and Israel is farfetched and impossible. However as each day passes Iran gets closer to having the nuclear power to achieve this “impossible idea”. Iran claims that their nuclear program is not to be used to make nuclear weapons. However America and many other countries cannot trust that claim and do nothing while Iran develops its nuclear capabilities. Iran’s nuclear program must be stopped immediately to insure the security of America , Israel and many other countries. We cannot remain complacent and believe the words of a man who has often proclaimed that he would be happy to see the demise of an entire country and its inhabitants. A man that openly denies the Holocaust on national television, and once stated that “ Iran can recruit hundreds of suicide bombers a day. Suicide is an invincible weapon, Suicide bombers in this land showed us the way and they enlighten our future”. How can we believe a man who supports suicide bombers who give up there their own lives to kill innocent men women and children ? Ahmadinejad’s reference to “suicide bombers in this land” alludes to the Iran-Iraq war in which thousands of young Iranians were used a human weapons. In his article “Suicide bombing as Worship: Dimensions of Jihad” author Denis McEoin writes that:“It was a real-life…