Irene Accuses Revealed In Darla's Case
If Irene files a tort action against her sister Darla for alleging slander, Irene will be successful in her case. But first, what does it mean to allege slander mean? The plaintiff must show that a wrongful statement has been made that causes a person to suffer economically or monetary. Although Darla overheard Irene’s comment on the phone for trying to accept products without paying she does not have physical evidence to prove that she said this. Now for Darla, she told several of her friends about the situation using what she heard herself without no physical evidence. For Irene, she is now being ultimately “accused” of taking products without payment thus showing that Darla can be filed for alleging slander.
If Irene accuses Darla of committing
libel damages which a damage to harm one’s reputation or emotions in the eyes of the community. The defenses Darla could assert is that she wrote a letter to the editor of a newspaper company which is a third party, but the comment made against Irene had yet to be published to the public. Her defense can be that Irene is the mayor of her town and is now considered a “public figure” and statements made against a public figure are considered defamatory statements meaning that Darla’s comment is just an another comment made unless they are made with actual malice thus cannot be charged for damages for libel.
If Irene accepts goods shipped from Indonesia that were wrongfully obtained, she has committed an intentional tort against property. The law states that when personal property is wrongfully taken from the rightful owner or possessor then placing in the service of another is accused of conversion. Irene is knowingly accepting the product from another country and another possessor wrongfully without pay, then planning to distribute the product in her store for personal profit.
If Greene files negligence against the store, then she would be able to win the case. Darla is the current store manager at the time of store being open, where she is responsible for what happens in the store. Although Darla was tending to the telephone call during work hours she had received, customers are a responsibility even when she did not attend to hurt Mrs. Greene, an elderly lady. Darla has the duty of care, failure to watch Mrs. Greene led to act of her injuring herself in the process. Darla also had left the stockroom door “carelessly” open and thus making her at fault for the failure of duty of care.
If Irene accuses Darla of committing
libel damages which a damage to harm one’s reputation or emotions in the eyes of the community. The defenses Darla could assert is that she wrote a letter to the editor of a newspaper company which is a third party, but the comment made against Irene had yet to be published to the public. Her defense can be that Irene is the mayor of her town and is now considered a “public figure” and statements made against a public figure are considered defamatory statements meaning that Darla’s comment is just an another comment made unless they are made with actual malice thus cannot be charged for damages for libel.
If Irene accepts goods shipped from Indonesia that were wrongfully obtained, she has committed an intentional tort against property. The law states that when personal property is wrongfully taken from the rightful owner or possessor then placing in the service of another is accused of conversion. Irene is knowingly accepting the product from another country and another possessor wrongfully without pay, then planning to distribute the product in her store for personal profit.
If Greene files negligence against the store, then she would be able to win the case. Darla is the current store manager at the time of store being open, where she is responsible for what happens in the store. Although Darla was tending to the telephone call during work hours she had received, customers are a responsibility even when she did not attend to hurt Mrs. Greene, an elderly lady. Darla has the duty of care, failure to watch Mrs. Greene led to act of her injuring herself in the process. Darla also had left the stockroom door “carelessly” open and thus making her at fault for the failure of duty of care.