Preview

Is It Justifiable to Break the Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
627 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is It Justifiable to Break the Law
Guido 1
10/4/14
Comp/Lit/1
Final DraftIs It Justifiable to Break the Law?
There were times in history when breaking the law was justified. I believe that if you could break the law you should. Great leaders like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr broke the law and changed the world for the better. Breaking the law is justifiable and acceptable when the law violates human rights and conscience. Certainly, rules are established for us to follow. However, we as human beings should be able to differentiate from right and wrong incase laws need to be violated for the right cause. Even with hard consequences, breaking the law can be justified, considering the situations and the purposes.
Justification of the of laws depends on the situation, not on the rules and regulations. In certain places of the world there are extraordinary laws that might not be acceptable to all. We cannot ignore the fact that in the civil wars and world wars era the abolitionists were breaking the laws, which surely had a cause but the killing of innocent people and the millions of lives lost do not have an explanation. Such violation in today’s era, cannot be justified (A Theory of justice 1972, 1975).

Guido 2
Laws are simply human built, someone somewhere proposed them and implemented those for a reason and sometimes these reasons are completely not justified. Killing is one of the best examples for such unjustified rules where a member of a family is killed by the social groups or any other members, due to the belief that the victim has brought dishonor to the family or society. Obeying blindly and blind faith are the major causes of such disgraceful activities happening in the society. Murders simply are the worst violation of human rights. People surely have the right to choose for themselves but unfortunately they don’t and they kill. People, mostly Hindus, believe in shamans and willingly and unwillingly they commit serious crimes which they think is right but which actually is



Cited: Rawls, John “A Theory of justice”, Oxford: Oxford Press, 1972, 1975. Thoreau, Henry David. Walden and "Civil Disobedience". New York: Signet Classics, 1980. Vinit Hasker, Civil Disobedience, Threats and Offers: Gandhi and Rawls, Oxford: / Oxford University Press, 1986, Wagenknecht, Edward. Henry David Thoreau, What Manner of Man? Amherst: University of / Massachusetts Press, 1981.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1. What is Thoreau’s purpose in composing this essay? Does he want to inform, persuade, entertain, or a combination?…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau is a really intelligent and philosophical man, that was the first thing I observed about him due to his constant references…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having no say against these laws is also an example of injustice. Who would want to live under a code of laws that are hypocritical, unfair, and unjust?…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry David Thoreau was a environmental scientist, American philosopher, and a poet. Henry David Thoreau’s work has been seen having foreshadowed central insights of later philosophical movements like pragmatism and existentialism. He was a leading figure in the Transcendentalist movement. Thoreau is on of the most Transcendentalists today because of his ecological consciousness, independence, commitment to abolitionism, his thought of peaceful resistance. His poem style and habit of close observation are still…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King makes notice of the fact that most of the laws being broken at that time were unjust laws. He mentions that people would break unjust laws on purpose as a protest. If you break a just law intentionally, you are just a bad person who wants to break the law. However, if you are breaking an unjust law intentionally, “you must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty.”, from the words of Dr. King. People would break these laws in order to make a change for the better.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau begins his essay by arguing that the government intervenes too much and it would be better if they were not involved at all. He believes men are too absent minded and do whatever the government says without thinking about their morals. Those who listen and follow the government are not wise and do not trust their conscience.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law is good. Man, in his needs, has different motivations for law in his society. His secular needs require striving for justice, social stability and punishment. However, in the area of religious influence, law should promote morality so that believers can get close to god or be separated and condemned by god. As man and society evolves, the purpose of law has remained the same – to punish and deter.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written during the 19th century, while the movement of transcendentalism was developed and active, Thoreau considered himself a transcendentalist, influencing him to write this literary piece, and his thoughts and perspective of life within it. Targeting an attentive, intellectual, and mature audience, he describes his attitude toward life through composition of rhetorical methods, such as alliteration and metaphors.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau is a man of many facets; a man who refuses to conform to what the masses believe is acceptable. He calls for the rejection of complexity and for a change in mankind's view of life. Thoreau, in his many writings, demands change in a stagnant society. He emphasizes respect for nature, even to the point of blatant disrespect for humanity.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, others believe that people only follow the rules of the law because they do not want to get into trouble and face up to any punishments. They believe without the law ethics and morals would not exist. This means that, for example, murder or rape would be socially accepted because there is no one to say it is wrong. Therefore the only reason people don’t do these unacceptable things is so they do not have to take any consequences such as going to court or prison.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thoreau, Henry David. Walden and Civil Disobedience. New York: W. Norton & Company, Inc, 1966.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, not all laws are founded in morals, in many instances it’s just a matter of power. After all, everything Adolf Hitler did was legally permitted. Laws are not always ethically justified, therefore, one has the moral obligation to challenge it. As Elie Wiesel stated, “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An Argument Against Egoism

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Shaftesbury, Lord, “Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times,” edited by Lawrence E. Klein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Firstly, one must define what an unjust law is. According to Martin Luther King, an unjust law is “any law that degrades human personality” (King 179). In other words, it is a law that is directed against a certain group of people or is inflicted on a minority. He continues on by stating that “an unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself” (King 179), meaning that any law that causes a person to suffer simply because they do not agree with this majority is an incorrect and unjust law.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Singer gives two typical arguments in favor of obeying these unjust laws. I will address these arguments one at a time. The first argument says that, "By disobeying [a law] I set an example for others that may lead them to disobey too. The effect may multiply and contribute to a decline in law and order. In an extreme case, it may lead to civil war." (Singer, 297)…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays