Preview

Is Killing Justified In The Most Dangerous Game

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Killing Justified In The Most Dangerous Game
Starting off a bit morbid, 55 million people die every day. Some deaths are uncontrollable but some are homicides. In reading The Most Dangerous Game we as a class were asked whether or not it is considered okay to kill someone but like a ballot there were mixed results. This can branch out into many different topics ranging from abortion to downright murder. In my opinion, I think that killing is justified if you have a probable cause such as self defense, death penance, and abortion.

Self defense is not something that should be taken lightly. Its dictionary definition is, the act of defending one's person when physically attacked, as by countering blows or overcoming an assailant (dictionary.com). So that being said, self defense is probable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In an action movie, producers and directors add certain music to certain scenes to make them more suspenseful, sad, etc. Many authors add details to a story about the setting to accomplish the same goal. In the story, Most Dangerous Game, the author adds many details about the dark night, General Zaroff’s mansion, and the jungle to add more suspense, or terror, to the story.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some moments when killing can be justified, though it rarely is. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the two main characters have the same mentality but different point of views on killing. Sanger Rainsford is an intelligent, professional “Big Game Hunter” that hunts a large variety of animals. General Zaroff is a sociopathic “Dangerous Game Hunter” that finds great interest in hunting human beings. In this story, Sanger Rainsford hunted animals which was proven rationalized where as General Zaroff hunted humans which was proven unjustified.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Most Dangerous Game”, the author uses many methods to develop the characters and how they see the world, themselves, and others around them. First, Rainsford gets stranded on an island after he is talking to a friend on a yacht he was on about how the hunter is dominant and how the animals hunted do not feel anything which could be foreshadowing a change in the story and what it’s based on. After he arrives on the island, Rainsford immediately goes and sees a sign of struggle in bushes and hears shots fired. This, and the way that Rainsford was able to follow the tracks of the hunter, shows that Rainsford is a fairly efficient hunter; that is, showing the audience what the main idea of the story most likely is, which the hunter vs. the hunted.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is killing justified? When is killing justified? Killing is justified because some people do things to get the death penalty. In the book (Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck) there are these 2 characters who get this job in California and the big guy, Lennie, kills the boss's son’s (Curley) wife. So George, went to find him and he shot Lennie because he killed Curley’s wife and it was either he kill Lennie or Curley and the others.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the story's protagonist Sanger Rainsford is hunted throughout the jungle of an uninhabited island, by General Zaroff a man who is fixated on hunting humans for sport. In the short story “Lady or the Tiger?” by Frank Stockton, an imperious, semi-barbaric king rules over his kingdom with an iron fist, when his daughter falls in love with a young man he uses this opportunity to put the man in a public arena, where his is given the option of marriage or death. Both authors create villainous characters…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The most prominent type of conflict in "The Most Dangerous Game" is man vs man. A man vs man conflict is when two characters have a problem with/against one another. This kind of conflict is seen between Sanjer Rainsford and General Zaroff. Sanger Rainsford is trying to escape from General Zaroff but is finding this difficult because of the other environmental and personal conflicts he is facing. General Zaroff wants to kill Sanger Rainsford and eat him, but also wants to have fun while doing it and hunt him, so he can feel presumably feel accomplished and less guilty for his actions.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is commonly believed that if you are in a position of power and authority you will always remain so. In his fictional short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” Richard Connell’s characters, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff, had the same opinion. Like many individuals, neither men ever expected to be placed in a position of weakness. The deadly conflict that led to both Rainsford and Zaroff hunting and being hunted developed the theme, “strength and power are temporary,” because two once powerful men suddenly fell.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone in this world is influenced by someone or something. Your friends, parents, teachers, and even technology are only a few things that make you the person you are today. So when Rainsford stated that, "The world is made up of two classes: The hunters and the huntees. I agree with Rainsford; everyone is forced or influenced to do things. For example, bullies force you to be stronger, parents push you to be a better person and society pushes you to be the individual you are today.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a very thin line drawn in the debate whether or not death to another person is ever justifiable. There are so many different cases where I have a double sided opinion. I ultimately think that reasons for death such as euthanasia, abortion, acting in self-defense, etc. really depend on the circumstances of the situation. Webster’s dictionary defined murder as "the unlawful killing of another human being, especially with premeditated malice." What exactly is justifiable killing? Is abortion Okay? What about euthanasia, self-defense, war, or capital punishment? No I am not a believer in war, abortion nor do I think that taking another’s life is the absolute best decision. However if someone is putting your life or your loved ones life at harm, is that a reasonable clause, to use self-defense to protect your own life? I do believe it can be justified, but not always justifiable.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is killing ever justified? Yes, killing is justified in certain situations. An example would be if a burglar comes into someone's house. The first thing they do is grab a gun or knife and use self defense. Some people will say no they should be punished people should not kill anyone under any conflict. Then, some people say just the opposite. Another example would be during a person's life time they can experience very painful illnesses. People should have the rights where they can die when they want only, if they are in a very painful stage of an illness or injury.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the author presents many kinds of different conflicts and events in short story to enhance the mood. Examples of this can be seen in many places in the short story like man vs.. Man ; this is between the character of the story. This can also include two of the main characters and also between to enemies. Another example would be man vs.. Nature ;this is when a character fights the nature to survive. Also, man vs.. Self; this is when the person is not sure of himself what he want to do. These are used by the author in story to bring more interest in it. Also these are used to help build up every character in the story. The first one in the short story that shows up is man vs.. Nature which is the basic cause to the other in the entire story. In the story the reason do to why man vs.. Nature is first or comes is that because of the nature the character got in problem and ended up falling in the ocean looking for his pipe that had fell. The darkness makes it hard for him to see and then he ends up making him unstable and fell in the ocean too. But rainsford had surviving the natures test, but then in the story rainsford get to the island but is not sure of to where he really is because of the darkness and he describes it as the “moist black velvet”.Then as we move on in the short story rainsford faces man vs.. Self. Rainsford was secured of dead because he didn't’t want to face reality that to the islanders he is just a target and need to be treated like it to. That’s the main purpose why he is secured and is afraid to know what they will do to his body. But to islanded he’s just fish that got in there hands and they want to use it and will abuse it to if need it. Which makes a internal conflict because that’s what comes to his mind.The resolution is the story's final sentence: "He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided." That sentence tells us that Rainsford defeated General Croft in their…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dangerous game

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People have always sought to escape their mundane realities through fantastic stories. Richard Connell “The most dangerous game” provides this type of reprieve from reality. Through hyperbolic, stock protagonist and antagonist, a simplistic conflict, and a happy end “The most dangerous game” presents itself to be purely commercial fiction.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be a survivor you need 3 important traits , dedication, craftiness, and intelligence. In the most dangerous games, Rainsford, a hunter who survived being hunted in the woods for 4-5 days. Zaroff another hunter who lived on the island trapped Rainsford on the island and hunted him for trophy. Rainsford spent those days running and making traps to try and escape Zaroff. It shows craftiness because he built his traps made from things he found in the jungle. And it shows intelligent because he knew how to avoid zaroff and survive. It shows determined because he never gave up.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sue, A. P. (1998, Jan 25). Pro-death penalty but chivalrous texans debate fate of karla faye tucker. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/408352096?accountid=32521…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are lots of arguments to say when killing is justified as in the case of a war. In World War II the Nazi’s attempting to kill all the Jews in the world was definitely not justified, but on the other hand the Allies killing was justified because they were trying to keep the Germans from taking over the world and because of this we live in the world we live today.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays