Preview

Is Religion and Science Mutually Exclusive

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1030 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Religion and Science Mutually Exclusive
Is Religion and Science Mutually Exclusive? Religion and science both serve different purposes in the world, however their purpose produce the same goal depending on what one believes in. Christians believe that the world was created by God in seven days while scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory. Jane Goodall, known for her study of chimpanzees, expresses her belief that oneness with nature is best achieved through first hand observation in her essay, “In the Forest of Gombe.” On the other hand, Barbara Kingsolver views science, especially Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection, as the only answer to understanding the environment. In her essay, “A Fist in the Eye of God,” Kingsolver examines the concept of genetic engineering and presents the reader with the dangers of this scientific concept. Goodall and Kingsolver both discuss nature, evolution, science and religion. Although they have different views about how nature came about, they both believe that the natural world should be left alone. For Goodall a connection exists between science and religion yet Kingsolver feels that the theory of evolution should be taught to children instead of religion.
Most often people believe that science and religion are mutually exclusive. Yet Jane Goodall found a way to connect the two. She was questioned by a bellhop about her beliefs, “I told him that I had always thought that the biblical description of God creating the world in seven days might well have been an attempt to explain evolution in a parable. In that case, each of the days would have been several million years” (Goodall, 114). Being a scientist, Goodall believed that animals evolved overtime, yet she also believed that God existed and that possibly the theory of evolution and the biblical description of the creation of the world were just metaphors for one another. Many people would not think of combining the two concepts of religion and science yet Goodall’s explanation is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacks Great Partnership

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his introduction Sacks’ states that he wants “to argue that we need both religion and science; that they are compatible and more than compatible” (2). He uses his discussion on Darwinism as a way to illustrate how science and religion are compatible. Sack’s states that “the question is neither does ‘Darwinism refute religion?’ nor ‘does Religion refute Darwinism?’ Rather: how does each shed light on the other?” (215). Thus, he asserts that science can broaden our understanding of religion and that religion can broaden our understanding of science. He uses his analysis of Darwinism to show the different ways that science is consistent with religion. According to Sacks’ Darwinism shows that: God loves diversity, God made his creations creative, all life comes from one source, life is linguistic and all life is connected. He states that “Darwinism biology does not entail the absence of design”…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the Topic of Science and Faith In today’s secular society, it is commonly believed that science and faith are completely unrelated entities. However, Beginnings by Leonard Brand and David Jarnes argues the opposite.” The main purpose of Beginnings is to display ways in which faith can give some valuable insight in the subject area of science. The book does so by including faith and religion in the dialogue concerning topics that appear to be areas of conflict between science and faith.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Entwistle

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “In many ways the foundations of science were paved in part by Christian worldview that allowed for the universe to be seen as an orderly place in which laws could describe the regularities found within it, based on the premise that the world was created by a powerful, rational and person Being” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 33).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a result of many new astronomical discoveries throughout the seventeenth century, it was clear science and religion greatly contradicted each other. Followed by the questioned findings of Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei believed the sun was situated motionless in the center of the universe while the earth rotated on its axis, all the while revolving around the sun. This idea, though scientifically proven to be correct, completely opposed the underlying structure of the universe and heavens as originally stated in the Holy Bible. In his “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina,” Galileo explained to his subject how what was found true through physical findings were not in fact directly coincided with matters of faith. Unlike what was stated in the Bible, Galileo felt as though faith and science were two separate entities, and should be kept apart. Naturally, Galileo’s scientific findings sent the Catholic world into an uproar. As a result of the craziness that ensued from his astronomical discoveries within the theologian society, Galileo believed theologians should not have been allowed to be involved in the world of science during the 17th century in his “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina.”…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Questions on the origin of life and of the universe must have permeated human thought since the very beginning of the thought process itself. Philosophers, natural scientists, and theologians have long historical records of dealing with the explanations of mankind's origin, function, purpose, and ultimate destiny1. In a seemingly never-ending process of debate and debunk, the scientific community has clung fast to evolutionary theory as a matter of proven fact. Those opposing this view have, over the course of the twentieth century, morphed the creationistic view into something more, along the way gaining the support of a small portion of the scientific community. In the process, Americans have found themselves being tested along both logical and value based beliefs. This paper will not so much discuss the scientific approach to the controversy. The arguments defending evolution are well documented. What will be discussed is the change in the presentation of creationism to a more scientific theory which is, though still hotly debated, gaining the support of some of science's elite, and what has brought it to this new level of examination and criticism. In order to understand the recent change in the letter of creationism law, it is necessary to first explain, briefly, the difference between creationism and evolution.…

    • 3622 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influence in society today? (33 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ferngren, G.B. (2002) Science and Religion: a historical introduction. Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolutionary theories have sparked a fierce, passionate debate between followers of science and religion, respectively, from the last few hundred years to present day. Scandals relating to the topic, such as the example of a school board’s science curriculum in Dover, Pennsylvania, are broadcasted on a local, national and global level and one would be hard pressed to find an individual that does not have an opinion on the matter. Religious extremist believe life should be credited to their ever-wonderful and wise God, opposing the generally accepted theory scientist have been working and testing for years, that of evolution through Natural Selection. This debate has been ongoing for literally centuries despite one side being embarrassingly unprepared. The amount of plausible and logical arguments the theory of Natural Selection brings to the table far outnumbers those of Intelligent Design.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lawrence Krauss has repeatedly stated that teaching religion in science is “child abuse”. The term, “child abuse” when used in this context is extreme. Krauss (2013) explains the purpose of education is to teach children the truth providing empirical evidence based on facts, and knowledge of science and religion do not coexist. However, Krauss wants to exclude religion from science because he observes that there are ethical boundaries in science such as telling the truth, but the methodology is to exclude religion from education in general because religion is fiction with no empirical evidence to support it but only have ethics. Krauss justifies how science based, not on ideology or testimonies science supports the methods with empirical facts that can provide us a better understanding to overcome ignorance. While “child abuse” perhaps antagonizing word to express Krauss’s ideas, on the other hand, creationism with science should not be taught in class because they based on different knowledge that also contradicts the other. Religion does not have a place in science but does have a role as a subject as long it is not mixed with science.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people think that science should replace religion because religion is a left over from the infancy of our intelligence and religion makes humans to not be able to think critically because they do not want to believe the facts that science could explain everything and that God does not exist. What science could not do before, for example, people like Aristotle and other ancient Greek scholars believed that the Earth was round till Isaac Newton first proposed that Earth was not perfectly round, based on some research that have proven Newton’s claim, such as because of the Earth being sphere, the distance from Earth’s center to sea level is roughly 13 miles greater at the equator than at the poles. Hence science, knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe, should work together with religion, a set of beliefs that is held by a group of people, because both can complete each other’s flaws.…

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the dawn of man, humans have striven to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to explain how it began. Throughout this journey, numerous standpoints on existence have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called religion. However, as the human race has grown and advanced itself, many ideas expressed by religion seem less and less plausible. Advances in science and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious ideology. Our new, scientifically grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age-old questions, which oppose the explanations offered by religion. As strong scientific evidence has surfaced which is contrary to the prevailing religious view, open-minded believers have adapted their beliefs accordingly, but many fundamentalists refuse to accept scientific evidence. This is the root of the dilemma between science and religion. Many scientists and theists have offered their views concerning the ongoing battle between the scientific ‘big bang’ theory and the religious creation stories.…

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transhumanism

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The role of religion in providing explanations, however poor, of human life and its environment has given way over time to the superior resources of empirical science. Science has been able to explain an enormous variety of phenomena, both commonplace and unusual. Protestations by theists that science has not and cannot explain the origin of life, the origin of the universe, or the nature of consciousness are increasingly ridiculous as we continue to learn and…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    K.C. Cole discusses in her article, “Seeing Things,” that there is never just one way to look at something. There are numerous views one can take on when observing possible scientific theories. Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution is criticized and compared to the theory of creationism. Both theories are prime examples of seeing things from a different perspective influenced by either science or religion. The ability to see things clearly resonates in both arguments and each side presents a different way on how to perceive their own theory. To have clear vision you must be able to make decisions based on the information given to you as well as provide intelligent answers about how you see things.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The evolution theory of Charles Darwin will continue being stronger compared to the traditional religious beliefs of creation. Among the many diverse issues in the society with intense controversy, the ongoing conflict between religious segments and the world of science is underscored. In this view, the following argumentative essay will scrutinize this debate between creationism and evolution to show how the later holds more weight and worth believing. Evolution theory has proved that the creationist beliefs, as well as their denials, tend to defy logic, reality and science. Science can be considered as an intelligent understanding of phenomena while religion is more of a blind belief. Reality has been proven to occur in the thinking patterns of many scientists, to lesser or greater degree of many creationists and others that do not…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays