This clash between creationism and evolution has led to the debate raging debate for over a hundred years now (Carter 980). Among the differences in the two sides is that one is based and was founded on data that was proven. On the other hand, the opposing side is based on pure belief. Evolution is considered as being a science that is explained within the frameworks of science methodology. An apt example to back this up is the argument held by evolutionists that man evolved from a primitive ape. On the other side of the argument, creation science holds that an intelligent designer created the universe (Witham 76-80). The designer also created all other things that are present not just on earth, but also in the past, approximately six thousand years. The creationist has been disregarding Darwin’s scientific evidence on the basis that it is a fact that the evolution theory happens to leave gaps. Scientifically speaking, there lacks evidence as well as proven science to indicate an existence of an intelligent
This clash between creationism and evolution has led to the debate raging debate for over a hundred years now (Carter 980). Among the differences in the two sides is that one is based and was founded on data that was proven. On the other hand, the opposing side is based on pure belief. Evolution is considered as being a science that is explained within the frameworks of science methodology. An apt example to back this up is the argument held by evolutionists that man evolved from a primitive ape. On the other side of the argument, creation science holds that an intelligent designer created the universe (Witham 76-80). The designer also created all other things that are present not just on earth, but also in the past, approximately six thousand years. The creationist has been disregarding Darwin’s scientific evidence on the basis that it is a fact that the evolution theory happens to leave gaps. Scientifically speaking, there lacks evidence as well as proven science to indicate an existence of an intelligent