Preview

Is The Conservative Party Exists To Conserve?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is The Conservative Party Exists To Conserve?
Against all odds

“The Conservative Party exists to conserve”, but what exactly does it desire to conserve? According to Samuel Huntington, conservatism wishes to justify the established order (Huntington, 1957, p. 455). This established order was, when the Conservative Party was founded in the 1830s, an elitist order that justifies income inequality by saying it is natural and inevitable (Dorey, 2011, p. 5). When the franchise expanded and the working class became represented, the Conservative Party did not disappear from the political field, but flourished and is currently in government as one of the most prominent parties in the United Kingdom. Various factors explain this possibly unexpected success and this essay aims discuss the most
…show more content…
Conservatism is closely related to the elite and this elite has more money than for example the leaders of the Labour party, this means that the Conservative party has a strong advantage on the other party. Two main advantages have been vital to the Conservative party. Firstly, they have been able to put up bigger election campaign and have therefore been able to shape the general opinion more towards their advantage (Bale, 2012, p. 65). This is shown to be a structural phenomenon, like in the already discussed preference of woman to vote conservative or to profile the Conservative as the natural, responsible party; but as well on the short term during elections. Conservatives were also often the top of the society, their families have been in power, so they must know how to govern, they are rich, so they must know how to become rich. The availability of money is also made a large amount of polling possible since the Second World War. One of the big conservative issues is that they are often regarded as out of touch with the ‘normal people’, they did not know very well what the voters desired (Taylor, 2003, p.81). In the 1945 the Conservative Party was very unsuccessful and the polls helped to find out why this was the case. One of the outcomes was that voters were not satisfied with the Labour party, but …show more content…
While the Labour party has always adapted their agenda to the working class the Conservatives try to come across as party that does not focus on a specific class, religion or ethnicity but on terms that relate to everybody like ‘the nation’ or ‘the people’. A conservative party can do this, because their name does not, like Labour or Liberalism, imply a certain ideology. The core of Conservatism is to focus on tradition and protects the existing structure of order (Huntington,1957, p. 455). Certain changes in the 60s contributed to this, the working class was shrinking and the manual workers felt less connected by just class with the Labour. You could therefore say there was a shift from class voting to valence voting, which meant that people were less likely to vote according to their class, but more likely to vote what they believed would give the most prosperity (Turner, 2003, p. 190). This does not mean that people will automatically vote Conservative, but it does help the Conservatives because workers are less likely to vote automatically vote

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is undeniable that between December 1832 and the election of 1841, under the leadership of Peel, the Tory party enjoyed a revival in terms of its popularity and organisation, under the leader ship of Robert Peel. Although some historians believe that this success can mainly be attributed to the actions of Peel, such as the Tamworth Manifesto, strong evidence, argued by reputed historians such as Eric Evans exists to suggest that the successes of the Conservative Party in the 1830’s can only partially be attributed to Peel himself.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class dealignment can be described as the relationship between social class and voting behaviour weakening, meaning that the electorate are beginning to vote for political parties which are not generally associated with their social class. The extract quotes “In the 1960s, Peter Pulzer concluded that, 'class is the basis of British party politics.'” The 1970s showed how the electorate strongly stuck to voting for parties based on their social class, and confirms Pulzer's ideas. In '74, 56% of the Conservatives support was from ABC1 classes, whilst the majority of Labours was from C2 and DE classes. The table in the extract shows how the percentage change of C1, C2 and DE class votes for the Labour party has decreased greatly – 11% for C2 and 8% for DE - which confirms the idea of class dealignment, as people from working class backgrounds such as C2 and DE have been more likely to vote for Labour in the past.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the period of 1945-1970 was seen as an era of electoral stability, partially due to the stability of the voting patterns and the strong party identification. Thus the party identification model was supported by this period as partisan alignment, which is the long term manifestation of beliefs and loyalties was prominent in deterring the way the electorate voted. Supported by Punnet in 1971 was believed “for most people voting behaviour is habitual and ingrained”. Also, it was noted because of the dominance of the two main parties; Labour and Conservative whom gained on average 90% of the vote in the general elections. The sociological theory was identifiable in this period, which supported the idea of class alignment as people had a strong association of membership to a social class with the support of a political party. Pulzer stated in 1967 “the middle class had a tendency to vote Conservative and the working class had a tendency to vote Labour”. Although, short term factors such as the election campaign has significance as the elections were won by winning over the “floating voters” in important constituencies. These are all long-term factors that seemed to shape voting behaviour most extensively, however since this period the dominance has been reversed.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tory government from 1819 to 1829 introduced a lot of social and economic reforms, which had both positive and negative effects and varied in success. The cabinet shuffle in 1822 gave the Tories a ‘liberal’ reputation as many of the successful reforms came after this; however it can be questioned whether or not they were as liberal as they seemed as a lot of their reforms had already been in production beforehand and were not actually thought of by the ‘liberal’ Tory government.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics has certainly changed over the last few decades. The idea of British politics become Americanised is one factor in this change. In modern day politics it is obvious that the electorate have different things to take into consideration when they approach the ballot box. In this essay I will debate whether short term factors have more of an effect in voters’ minds than long term factors.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a significant decline since the post war consensus in the influence of social factors such as class and partisanship on voting behaviour. Class lines have become blurred from increased affluence, improved education and changes in the Labour market such as the formation of a ‘new working class’; resulting in the centralisation of the main political parties to become ‘catch-all’ parties, adapting their policies for short-term gain and effectively putting an end to the relevance of party ideology. This has led many people to the conclusion that short-term rational choice factors such as the state of the economy, qualities of the party leader and government competence are now far more important in shaping voting behaviour than long-term social factors such as class, ethnicity, age and gender.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For instance, the new left demanded freedom and peace now by taking immediate action while the new rights took the approach of “patience”, thinking past the present and how the present affects the future. The new left sought power in the form of actions and not so much its organizations. While the new right believed that power came from a position, political office, or a job. Unlike the liberal, the conservatives did not suffer from a generation age gap. The younger conservatives respected the older conservatives and their ideas. The younger conservatives seek the older conservatives for guidance and help. Conservatives were directed towards the white-collar employed. Anticommunist was a highly important stance for the conservative party in the 1960s. Conservatives are often described as the party that goes the old-fashion way. Conservatives also strongly believed in the idea that since everyone was different this meant that everyone should have different rewards and…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the years of 1945-1970 social class dominantly shaped the voting behaviour of individuals. Whilst there has been a decline in prominence of class voting: Labour remains the most popular working class party and Conservatives perform best among middle-class voters. Social classes are defined by economic and social status, i.e. working class typically consists of blue-collar workers, and in the past a strong link existed between voting behaviour and social class. This link existed due to entrenched ideals within social classes and lack of upward social mobility, meaning stable, long-term relationships would form to a particular party that best reflected the interests of an individual’s socio economic group, i.e AB social classes were seemingly intertwined with the fabric of the Conservative party. This party identification, or partisan, led to 64% of the vote in the mid 1960’s compromising of B support for Conservatives and C1/2 support for Labour. Yet since the 1970’s there has been both class and partisan dealignment. This can be accredited to changes in employment patterns, educational opportunities and rising standards of living. This means that the core vote of the two main parties is reduced and there are more floating voters, who are sans allegiance or attachment to any political party, less than 40% of voters say they have a strong attachment to any party compared with 90% in post-war Britain. To compliment this, albeit Labour was founded upon a commitment to a class, in 1997 New Labour made significant gains across the middle-class…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conservatism as a political belief signifies an amalgamation of political ideologies including fiscal conservatism, free market or economic liberalism, social conservatism and religious conservatism, It also includes a support for a strong military, small government, and states ' rights. The tactics of conservatism vary widely by place and time. But the most central feature of conservatism is deference: a psychologically internalized attitude on the part of the common people that the aristocracies are better people than they are. Modern-day liberals often theorize that conservatives use "social issues" as a way to mask economic objectives, but this is almost backward: the true goal of conservatism is to establish an aristocracy, which is a social and psychological condition of inequality. Economic inequality and regressive taxation, while certainly welcomed by the aristocracy, are best understood as a means to their actual goal, which is simply to be aristocrats. More generally, it is crucial to conservatism that the people must literally love the order that dominates them.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robertson facing conservative thinking parties and his view thrust upon the reader as a means of recruiting thereaders…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The organic theory of the state can be seen as the conservative justification for their belief in hierarchy. The organic theory of the state compares the state and society to a living organism in which the components work together in necessarily unequal harmony. The entire entity is more than the sum of its parts and as such society, which is necessarily hierarchical, is more important than any individual within it. The organic state leads conservatives to not only believing in natural hierarchy, but it is also desirable. Conservatives have argued that they perceive class, but not class conflict. Thus those who are not privileged or prosperous are happy as their society brings them stability, security and rootedness. However many modern liberals would see this as conservatives ignoring social disadvantage and could argue that their interest in protecting their…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael Oakeshott was an Englishman born into the political turbulent era of 20th century, growing up exposed to a variety of political extremism in Europe, especially National Socialism and Marxism, along with two World Wars. As a result, he developed a dislike of radical political activism. This aversion is expressed in his work “On being Conservative,” where Oakeshott offers a unique political work that, instead of suggesting a prescriptive aid or explaining a political system, simply describes the conservative mindset. By doing so, he demystifies the conservative disposition during an era in which he believes is strongly anti-conservative in order to show its necessity in the world of politics.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays