Preview

Is the Law Fault Based?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is the Law Fault Based?
A2 AQA LAW
Is the law fault based?

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, Fault is defined as “error” or “blame”, the wrongdoing and extent of which the defendant is responsible for his actions. The law should only punish those who are at fault and impose punishments which are deserved, whilst being more lenient to those who are not at fault and did not foresee the consequences. In criminal law, fault is proven by the prosecution where people are found guilty, beyond reasonable doubt. In civil law, people are found liable, on a balance of probability.

In order to discuss and evaluate the definition of fault as a basis of crime, it must first be understood and identified where fault can exist. Offences in law are often graded accordingly depending on how much fault they reflect. E.g. indictable offences such as rape and murder are the most serious of crimes and therefore receive the mandatory life sentence in order to reflect this. They cause the most serious damage to the victim and require more intention. However, summary offences such as “common” assault only receive minimal prison sentences, but normally fines up to £5000. This is because the fault is deemed far less as the victim does not suffer as much and there is less intention to commit such a crime. Sentences also reflect to what extent the defendant was at fault. Aggravated factors, like a racially motivated attack or using a weapon indicates a higher level of intention and fault whilst mitigating factors like pleading guilty somewhat lessens the defendants fault in the eyes of the law.

The severity of the crime depends on the level of fault. This can be found in the actus reus of a crime- the guilty physical act. Murder, for example is a voluntary act which demonstrates a higher degree of fault and blame (Smith- where a solider stabbed another solider with a bayonet.) A voluntary act is normally a deliberate act and therefore seems fair to greater level of blame. An omission is defined

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Omission – An Omission is where the Actus Reus is in the form of not doing something, another term is negligence.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Involuntary manslaughter is split up into two offences Gross negligence manslaughter and constructive/unlawful manslaughter a general criticism of involuntary manslaughter is that there are two major problems with the wide range of conduct covered by the offence. The offences range from cases which just fall short of murder where the accused was aware there was a risk of death or serious harm but did not intend to cause either to the victim (R v Wacker), cases where the person is a experienced professional who makes a small but serious mistake resulting in death ( R v Adomako) and cases whereby a minor assault can end in death (R v Mitchell). This leads to problems in sentencing and labelling, including the fundamental problem that many cases currently amounting to unlawful act manslaughter involve only minor fault on the part of the defendant, and therefore should not be described as manslaughter at all.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 outline

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal liability - the degree of blameworthiness assigned to the defendants as a result of legal adjudication…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system has within it a set of rules, regulations and guidelines, known as criminal laws which are based on various sources, some dating back to England. Criminal law also has a purpose for which it was designed. Criminal laws have jurisdiction which keeps it structured and in order. Within criminal law are various offenses for which there must be standards of proof. Criminal law addresses liabilities as well, such as criminal liability and accomplice liability. In addition there are various types of offenses, one set of offenses known as inchoate offenses, which will be discussed and compared with other types of criminal offenses here.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An omission can amount to the Actus Reus of a crime, however, the general rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act. For example if you see a person drowning you have no obligation to help them. This could be seen as a gap in the law therefore it could said that this is a reason that English Criminal law should impose a duty on general citizens to assist a person in peril. Although this is the general rule there are exceptions. The first exception is when there is a statutory duty to act for example stopping at a red light under the Road Traffic Act 1988. Another example is where there is a contractual duty to act. This where it states in a defendants employment contract that they must act. A case example would be in R v Pitwood where the defendant failed to lower the level crossing barrier which resulted in the victim dying. The defendant was found guilty of manslaughter as he had breached his contractual duty. Finally the third exception is when the duty is imposed by law. There are three situations in which this may happen; failing to rectify a dangerous situation as in R v Miller, when there has been a voluntary acceptance of a duty as in Dobinson v Stone and finally misconduct in a public office as in R v…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan Unit 3 Paper

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this assignment I will define indeterminate and determinate sentencing. I will also support an argument that will be effective for addressing a crime. Finally I will summarize my assessment of the sentencing models.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is not fair for an individual to inflict pain and harm on another, threaten their safety, invade their space, and in some cases take a life, and remain free or receive punishment that does not fit the crime committed. However, criminals should and do have to pay for their actions, just or unjust. In line with the criminal justice system, a person commits a crime, and an…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a contemporary society where crime takes place we expect the state authority to dispense justice in the form of punishment to maintain social solidarity. There are many forms of punishment that can be given to an offender, each with their own functions for the offender and society itself.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime and Justice Process

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Victims can pursue one or even a combination of three distinct goals. The first is too see to it that hard-core offenders who act as predators are punished, The second is to use the justice process as leverage to compel lawbreakers to undergo rehabilitative treatment. The third possible aim is to get the court to order convicts to make restitution for any expenses arising from injuries and losses. Punishment is what comes to most people’s minds first, when considering what justice entails. Throughout history, people have always punished one another. However, they may disagree about their reasons for subjecting a wrongdoer to pain and suffering. Punishment is usually justified on utilitarian grounds as a necessary evil. It is argued that punishing transgressors curbs future criminality in a number of ways. The offender who experiences unpleasant consequences learns a lesson and is discouraged from breaking the law again, assuming that the logic of specific deterrence is sound. Making an example of a convicted criminal also serves as a warning to would be offenders contemplating the same act, provided that the doctrine of general deterrence really works.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sexual Assault Law Reform

    • 2371 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This assessment will firstly examine the condition in society, which led to the law reform mechanism in the 80’s. These reforms were amendments to the Crimes Act 1900. A case study will highlight the condition, which led to these changes. Following will identify and evaluate further significant amendments of the crimes act and their changes to legislation. A case study will also highlight this, demonstrating the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of these changes. Further on will include another law reform, discussing its flaws and fairness to society and victims.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social harm

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Not only has ‘crime’ received a very limited meaning in the past, in terms of variety, but also the concept was categorized simply as a physical or emotional injury to the individual. ‘Crime is not a self-evident and unitary concept. Its constitution is diverse, historically relative and continually contested. As a result, an answer to the question ‘what is crime?’ depends upon which of its multiple constitutive elements is emphasized. This in turn depends upon the theoretical position taken by those defining crime’.Therefore, crime is a process of negotiation and constant struggle over time, but there are some crimes that have been omitted only because society never took into consideration those other crime related problems that can affect an entire population, crimes that have come to be known as a new concept, that of ‘social harm’.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On a snowy Saturday afternoon, Harry and Paul watch football and drink beers at the local pub. Both drives away intoxicated, and both lose control of their cars on the slick roads, Harry collides with a tree, while Paul collides with a young girl playing in the snow and kills her. Harry can expect a fine of seven hundred dollars along with temporary suspension of his license. Paul’s punishment is far different: for vehicular manslaughter, he faces two to fifteen years imprisonment.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics