Preview

Is There Right To A Fair Trial?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is There Right To A Fair Trial?
The right to a fair trial is a common law right. A fair trial is designed to prevent wrongful convictions, protect people’s life, liberty and reputation. A fair trial ensures that accused people remain innocent until proven guilty and that their reputation is not harmed in the process (Australian Law Reform Commission, 2014). To ensure that every individual who is facing court after being accused of committing a crime has a fair trial, laws have been implemented to restrict powers specifically of police. In the context of the powers of police to investigate crime there are restrictions on how the investigation can be conducted and the evidence that can be used in court. The restrictions on police officers that enhance the possibility of a fair …show more content…
Police officers do have the power to request a search either of a person or a vehicle if they have reasonable grounds to believe the suspect is in possession of illegal drugs or weapons. A suspect can however, refuse to be searched as the only time a police officer can conduct a search without a warrant is if they have search by consent (Victorian Legal Aid, 2018). In terms of arresting a suspect, a constable may without a warrant arrest a person for an offence if the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the person as committed or is committing an offence (Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s3ZW). If the suspect has not been caught at the crime scene, then an investigating officer must issue a warrant for the person’s arrest based on information that has been laid before the officer, which outlines why it is believed that the suspect has committed a crime (Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s3ZA). Once the arrest has occurred the police officers are restricted to how they can investigate the crime. They cannot enter a suspect’s property to search the premises without a warrant from the magistrate’s court. For most criminal offences, generally, police officers do require warrants to execute certain areas of the investigation. This increases the chance of a fair a trial because in most cases unless the crimes mentioned before having been committed, police officers do not get to search a person or their property without a warrant. Therefore, people who are suspected of committing a crime are aware of what the police are doing during the investigation and have some idea of the evidence that could potentially be used against them. In addition to this, it also ensures that none of their other basic rights are being breached because the police officers cannot enter a person’s property without consent or without a warrant. This means that the individual’s right to privacy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The police did not conduct a lawful search and seizure under the guidelines set forth in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that search and seizure can occur during an arrest warrant that is being carried out but the "the area within control" of the suspect. The area within control was eventually decided as being the reach of arms length from the suspect. This is a lawful act designed to prevent the suspect from engaging in dangerous behavior towards others and also for the protection of any evidence the suspect may attempt to destroy. The suspect was not at the dwelling when officers arrived therefore no search and seizure should have taken place. Police officers were notified that the suspect was not present upon arrival and entry of the home. There were no reasonable causes for police to suspect that items dangerous to themselves were inside the home.…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Writs of Assistance- general search warrant-they can search where ever and take whatever they want.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Unit 5

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To obtain a search warrant, law enforcement officers must convince a judge that they have reasonable grounds to believe a search will reveal evidence of a specific illegality.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University Law School, No Date).” The first part of this section states that no warrant will be given unless there is probable cause that will lead the judge or magistrate to believe that there is a very good reason to invade the privacy of a citizen. If there is not enough evidence for the judge to justify the signing of a search warrant, then the officer needs to try and find more evidence that will bolster his or her case.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A police officer has powers to stop and search you if they suspect you are carrying; Illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property, something that can be used to commit a crime e.g. a crowbar.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper discusses the underlying circumstances to obtaining a warrant, and proving probable cause. Certain exceptions are made by law in some situations, such as searching vehicles. All officers of the law, and court officials are legally obligated to follow all rights reserved by the Fourth Amendment, and without doing so they could jeopardize their case. Investigation must take place before an officer can prove probable cause to a judge, and obtain a warrant. Warrants are necessary documents in apprehending suspects, conducting searches, and seizures. Without warrants, in most cases, evidence will be ruled as inadmissible. There are several ways to prove probable cause to obtain warrants. Without sufficient probable cause a warrant can not be issued to officers.…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This type of searches happens when police see a suspicious person trying to commit a crime, so they stopped them before it happens. The police…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    7. Law enforcement can with reasonable suspicion can pat down or search an individual that is suspected of being armed or may be involved in criminal activity. 8. Any time law enforcement has a suspect under arrest they must search that individual for the officer safety and the arrestee’s safety. There does not need to be a warrant issued if the individual is already in…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The police can search only the place described in a warrant and usually can seize only the property that the warrant describes (Swanson). The police cannot search a house if the warrant specifies only the backyard, nor can they search for weapons if the warrant specifies marijuana plants. However, this does not mean that police officers can seize only those items…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the criminal justice system a police officer or crime scene investigator cannot legally search a person or property without a search warrant. There have been ongoing debates and revisions on the legal requirements and circumstances under which it is necessary to obtain a search and seizure warrant before crime scene processing. According to the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements, a warrant is required any time a reasonable expectation of privacy exists. Therefore, in an effort to protect the right of the people and their belongings against unreasonable search and seizures and up hold the law officials accountable for fair treatment and processing procedures. When a crime scene investigator comes upon the scene, they must…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, if there was a probable cause to search that person because they were somehow involved, or an eyewitness identified their involvement while the crime was happening, a police officer could search them. If law enforcement came upon a scene where a crime was in progress, they could enter and search a location or person within the location of the crime in progress without violating that person’s fourth amendment rights.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A justifiable search could have many factors that would allow an officer to conduct a proper search or make a lawful detention and stops. One of them is a search warrant, which carries a limited authority to detain persons present and also search the property detailed on the warrant. Another is a criminal profile; an example would be of a drug dealer that would fit the physical description given to the officer. Anonymous tip, multiple informant’s, an example is like two or more persons able to identify someone that has committed a crime, and of course police observation. However if the officer sees something suspicious he/she has to articulate why such person has broken the law and given him/her probable cause to do a warrantless search or detention on such said person. Scope falls in the actual process of the search, meaning that you could only reasonably search with in the search area, an example that my teacher Mr. Enos discussed in class, was if your searching for alcohol in a vehicle then you could only search were alcohol could be reasonably hidden inside a car. Place refers to a public or private area, an…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    IV Amendment

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    If an officer is given consent to search, if the search is incident to a lawful arrest, if there is probable cause to search and exigent circumstances, if the items are in plain view. When an officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot, the officer may briefly stop the suspicious person and make reasonable inquiries aimed at confirming or dispelling the officer's suspicions. School officials need not obtain a warrant before searching a student who is under their authority; rather, a search of a student need only be reasonable under all the circumstances. Where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains evidence of a criminal activity, an officer may lawfully search any area of the vehicle in which the evidence might be found. An officer may conduct a traffic stop if he has reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation has occurred or that…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures requires police, if they have time to obtain a valid search warrant, issued by a magistrate after the police indicate under oath that they have probable cause to justify its issuance. Magistrates must perform this function in a neutral and detached manner and not serve merely as rubber stamps for the police. The warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things to be seizes. General search…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, these circumstances must require immediate action. Police officers can enter a home without a warrant to render emergency assistance to an occupant that is injured, to protect them from imminent injury, and if they have a reasonable belief that the person within the house is in need of immediate aid. If the delay in waiting for a search warrant would endanger the police officers lives or the lives of others. Another example of a warrantless search would be when there is sufficient justification that evidence is going to be destroyed. If the police officer is pursuing a suspect from a just-committed crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of death and/or serious bodily injury and the suspect a private residence, the police officer may enter without a warrant. They may also enter if it is to capture a person who retreats inside when lawfully attempted to detain or arrest the suspect while they are in a public place. If the police officer reasonably believes that a burglar, vandal, arsonist, or other criminal is within private premises committing or attempting to commit a property crime that may result in substantial loss or damage, they do not need to wait for a warrant to enter and prevent or minimize the loss (Rutledge,…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays