Preview

What Are The Exceptions To The Exclusionary Rule

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Exceptions To The Exclusionary Rule
Kevin Wallace
1/27/2017
CJAD 101
Dropbox 3 “SEARCH AND SEIZURE “

Search and seizure is a procedure used in many civil law and common law legal systems by which police or other authorities and their agents, who suspect that a crime has been committed, do a search of a person's property and confiscate any relevant evidence to the crime. the exclusionary rule is a rule that allows for the exclusion or suppression of evidence. This role prevents the government from using evidence in trial which was to be derived from an illegal search and seizure arrestor interrogation. There are several exceptions to the exclusionary rule that I have found and these are:
1. The good-faith exception-any evidence gained by law enforcement using a search warrant
…show more content…
Exigent circumstances–action is immediately necessary to prevent physical harm, preserve evidence or prevent a suspect from escaping
4. A majority of businesses that are regulated can be searched without a warrant (gun shops or similar businesses that might include weapons labs, explosives dealers, and anything else that has potential for public danger.
5. Arresting officers are entitled to perform a protective sweep of a property to make sure they’re not about to be ambushed. This is a limited search aimed solely at places where someone might be hiding. In rare cases, a protective sweep can be performed without an arrest.
6. Hot pursuit. If the police have been continuously chasing a criminal, they are entitled to follow him into a property and search without a warrant.
7. Law enforcement can with reasonable suspicion can pat down or search an individual that is suspected of being armed or may be involved in criminal activity.
8. Any time law enforcement has a suspect under arrest they must search that individual for the officer safety and the arrestee’s safety. There does not need to be a warrant issued if the individual is already in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Decision: The search was unreasonable under the 4th and 14th amendments. In arresting officer may search only the area “within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence. Any other search of the surrounding area requires a search warrant.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, contemporaneousness and inventory searches "if a government agent has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant" because "in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, driver and contraband or evidence could be long gone" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 case of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following paper discusses the use of warrants, arrests, and the searching of private residences, when the law enforcement officers involved have concluded that there is probable cause. Although, probable cause is a necessary requirement in the obtaining of a warrant and in the following through of arrest procedures, ironically, according to the Legal Information Institute at the Cornell Law School, “Neither the Fourth Amendment nor the federal statutory provisions relevant to the area define “probable cause;” the definition is entirely a judicial construct” (Cornell, 2006).…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weeks Vs United States

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Court established the Exclusionary Rule, which excludes any illegally obtained evidence from any unreasonable search or seizure, improper self-incriminatory statements, situations where defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to counsel to be used in court…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rules are included in the Fourth Amendment which is to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizure. As such, it prohibits police officers to use evidence…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Basically the Exclusionary rule as set forth by the US Supreme Court states that any evidence obtained by police through search and seizure, arrest, interrogations and stop and frisk situations or any other evidence despite its relevance can be excluded as evidence. The Weeks v. United States was basically the origin of the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. In Weeks v United States Mrs, Weeks was arrested for shoplifting and attempted to get a note to her husband about this. Law enforcement went to the residence and without a warrant searched the home and found illegal lottery tickets and removed everything in relation to the tickets charging him with a federal crime because there was evidence showing these were handled through the mail. Mr. Weeks attorney filed with the courts this was illegally obtained evidence and should be excluded.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University Law School, No Date).” The first part of this section states that no warrant will be given unless there is probable cause that will lead the judge or magistrate to believe that there is a very good reason to invade the privacy of a citizen. If there is not enough evidence for the judge to justify the signing of a search warrant, then the officer needs to try and find more evidence that will bolster his or her case.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I learned this semester the exclusionary rule is that the exclusionary rule is evidence that is declared in an illegal search could not be used in a federal court for the reason of a violation of citizens' rights, the fourth amendment. Although the exclusionary rule has its pros and cons, it protects innocent people from having charges brought on them. Nevertheless, I do agree with what Edwin Meese has to say around the exclusionary rule. Any officer who does not seize evidence properly can absolutely let criminals walk freely. It allows guilty people free and it also allows further crimes to be committed before being brought to jail.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court & Exclusionary rule In the case of Davis v. The United States, the supreme court revisited the exclusionary rule to examine the law enforcement's method of obtaining evidence. The exclusionary rule also covers the Fifth Amendment, which protects against self-incrimination. As stated in lesson 4, “The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to prevent illegal police conduct and to penalize overzealous police officers for illegal searches and seizures” (Rio Salado College, n.d., Role of the Prosecutor and Alternatives to Prosecution). The rule protects individuals from unlawful government conduct and protects them from self-incrimination. The Supreme Court revisited the good faith exception where evidence obtained by law enforcement officers in reasonable reliance on a search warrant that is invalid could later be admissible in court.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 3 Fourth Amendment

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    finalcopymarylandvking

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The 4th amendment protects us from unreasonable search and seizure. Once the police have a search warrant, the must be allowed to search the area or property on the warrant. An important bit of information for the American public to be aware of is what are the requirements for a search warrant as well as an arrest warrant and how they relate to privacy and probable cause. The public should also be aware that there are exceptions to warrant requirements that could make or break a case. A case to examine to better understand these is the case of Maryland v. King (Legal Information Institute (LII), 2010). In order to start to examine, one must first know what a search warrant is.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Exclusionary Rule, n.d.) The first case that applied the exclusionary rule was the case of Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 393, in which the Supreme Court “held that the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through a warrantless search.” (Exclusionary Rule, n.d.) The exclusionary rule requires an illegal action by a police officer or agent of the police, evidence secured as a result of the illegal action, and a “casual connection between the illegal action and the evidence secured.” (Evaluation, n.d.)…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidence obtained by a police officer in reasonable reliance on a search warrant that is subsequently found invalid may be admissible. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984). It is necessary that a reasonably well-trained officer would have believed that the warrant was valid. This has come to be known as the “good faith” or Leon exception to the exclusionary rule. Many states, however, have rejected this exception.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court put into law the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule has been in existence since the early 1900’s. This rule prohibits the use of evidence in a criminal trial when evidence is collected illegally; it gives protection to citizens who have been searched illegally by law enforcement who obtain illegal evidence for a conviction (Shestokas, 2014). The exclusionary rule has an extension called, Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine (1920). The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was established primarily to deter law enforcement from violating rights against unreasonable searches and seizures (American Law 2008).…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays