Preview

Because It’s Probable: Reviewing Probable Cause, Warrants, Searches, Arrests, and How They Intertwine.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Because It’s Probable: Reviewing Probable Cause, Warrants, Searches, Arrests, and How They Intertwine.
Running Head: BECAUSE IT’S PROBABLE: REVIEWING PROBABLE CAUSE, WARRANTS, SEARCHES, ARRESTS, AND HOW THEY INTERTWINE.

Because It’s Probable
September 6, 2006
AIU Online

Abstract The following paper reviews probable cause as it applies to the duties of law enforcement. We will review different scenarios involving probable cause and the different court rulings that govern police and other law enforcement officer’s procedures involving the searching of a residence, arresting offenders, and the use of warrants. Due, to the inconsistency and complexity involved in real life situations, a multiplicity of use involving warrants, probable cause, searches, and other police actions can occur. The following paper discusses the use of warrants, arrests, and the searching of private residences, when the law enforcement officers involved have concluded that there is probable cause. Although, probable cause is a necessary requirement in the obtaining of a warrant and in the following through of arrest procedures, ironically, according to the Legal Information Institute at the Cornell Law School, “Neither the Fourth Amendment nor the federal statutory provisions relevant to the area define “probable cause;” the definition is entirely a judicial construct” (Cornell, 2006). Perhaps, there is no clearly defined definition of probable cause. However, there are many relevant cases that have been tried and have established guidelines for the determination of what can be construed as probable cause. Two of these are Dumbra v. United States and Brinegar v. United States. The case 1925 case of Dumbra v. United States, the court consented that in order for a search warrant to be granted, the officer who is making the request merely needs to have “reasonable grounds at the time of his affidavit” (Cornell, 2006). The 1949 case of Brinegar v. United States, clearly announces that Probable cause is to be determined according to “the factual and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    King’s attorney argued that the warrantless search and seizure of the evidence within the apartment violated his client’s fourth amendment rights. The attorney then filed a motion to suppress the evidence which he claimed was illegally obtained. The court found that the warrantless entry was justified due to exigent circumstances which the officers encountered when they approached the apartment. These circumstances included the strong odor presence of marijuana, failure to respond to the door, and the movement which sounded consistent with the destruction of evidence.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: This case raises questions concerning the Fourth Amendment and searches incident to a lawful arrest. On September 13th, 1965, three police officers arrived at Chimel’s residence in Santa Ana, California. They possessed a search warrant, which authorized Chimel’s…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Each time a police officer chooses to make an arrest, they demonstrate whether or not they practice the proper discretion that their career field expects of them. For the particular case involving Ken Krook, a young man who had attempted to rob a liquor store, while holding the store clerk at gun point. While Ken fled the scene, a responding officer had been notified on behalf of the specific crime that had taken place following a veg description of the individual. After noticing an individual who seemed to fit the description of Ken Kook, the officer ran after the criminal, eventually making an arrest. This case brings up the issue involving what is and is not a proper use of discretion, and whether the arrest of Ken Krook was done lawfully.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wyoming V. Shatzer

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. The Supreme Court has previously held that if the police have probable cause to…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Probable Cause and Time to Secure a Warrant: Are the police at fault if, after obtaining evidence sufficient to establish probable cause to search, they do not seek a warrant, but instead knock on the door to speak with the occupant or obtain consent to search? No. This approach unjustifiably interferes with legitimate the police tactics. There are many entirely proper reasons why the police may not want to seek a search warrant as soon as the minimum evidence needed to establish probable cause is…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University Law School, No Date).” The first part of this section states that no warrant will be given unless there is probable cause that will lead the judge or magistrate to believe that there is a very good reason to invade the privacy of a citizen. If there is not enough evidence for the judge to justify the signing of a search warrant, then the officer needs to try and find more evidence that will bolster his or her case.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will show how current “Stop and Frisk” (Terry Stop, SQF) methods exercised presently diverge greatly from the initial precedent allowed in Terry v. Ohio (1968) due to the inability to concretely define reasonable suspicion as well as the broad applications of reasonable suspicion since 1968. The most notable current representation involves The New York Police Department (NYPD) and its policy regarding Terry Stops as a proactive crime prevention and investigative tool (Ridgeway, 2006). Also considering the benefits shown in Ultimately, reasonable suspicion needs…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An officer must first obtain a warrant to make an arrest for a minor offense he did not personally witness. This is known as the in-presence requirement. If conducting a search in a private home or on certain types of private property officers must have a warrant. One of the requirements needed to obtain a warrant is probable cause. Probable cause is present when there is a reasonable belief, based on facts that a crime has been or is being committed. The police must provide enough factual information to convince a judge to issue a warrant. This information can come from different sources. An officer’s firsthand knowledge, police informants, anonymous tips and telephone tips are some acceptable sources. Whatever the source, the information…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A search warrant must always be based on probable cause. We can define probable cause by facts or circumstances that would lead a person to believe that the place needs to be searched for important pieces of evidence to be found (Swanson 35). The probable cause is established by what is called a written affidavit prepared by the law enforcement officer or investigator. In the affidavit, the officer states all known facts and circumstances involving the suspects and items that are expected to be found. An affidavit contains 3 main parts that need to be described: the person, the property, and the facts. The search warrant must always describe in particular the place that is being searched. The description must be detailed enough to where the place being searched can easily be distinguished from any other place. It can be very easy to confuse one property with another; this is why it is extremely important for the description of the building to be very detailed and accurate.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Antonio Reynoso states, “All that we are asking is that we improve relationships. When people know their rights or feel that things are happening by procedure, there’s a level of accountability and respect that’s developed between both parties” (Expert Text Reynoso). Since this bill supports the Fourth Amendment’s right to conduct searches based upon probable cause, there…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Numerous individuals have a vast misconstruing on the variations between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion. Why is it important for people to understand the differences between these two important concepts? Understanding the differences between the two is essential on the grounds that one will result in a lawful search and the alternative will cause an unlawful search and seizure. As a quick definition, according to the textbook, Probable Cause is a law enforcement officer’s belief that supported by evidences and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 205). Whereas, Reasonable Suspicion can be considered to be more of an inclination a law enforcement officer will get (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). Reasonable Suspicion is employed when conducting an investigative stop; conversely, Probably Cause is required to arrest or place a suspect into custody (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). An officer must have both Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. Officers are taught this during their time in…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reasonable suspicion and probable cause are actually the most important concepts in the United States constitution in realizing when it is suitable for police to make a capture, search for evidence and stop an individual for questioning. In fact, reasonable suspicion and probable cause have developed through state and federal government court decisions, yet they started in the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reasonable suspicion signifies the standard based on which the criminal activities are observed and arrest warrants are formulated. On the other hand, probable cause can be described as the logical belief in which with the help of facts criminal activity has been devoted (Kinports, n.d.). This assignment intends to compare and contrast between the legal concepts of reasonable suspicion and probable cause. This assignment also evaluates in what way these legal concepts can be applied to law enforcement officers along with examining the situation in which the law enforcement officers do not require to arrest the suspect. This paper also examines the exceptions that require warrant and how and when each exception would be utilized.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Discretion

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will be writing about Police Discretion. I will start by defining Police Discretion then briefly discuss the use in domestic disturbances, minor misdemeanors, and traffic enforcement. I will also discuss the application of police discretion, the provisions it uses and how it is currently practiced. At the end of these brief descriptions, I will then present the myth that exists in regards to police discretion. And finally, I will end this paper with my personal opinion as well as a brief conclusion.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the police arrest a suspect and want to ask questions, the law in the United States requires law officials to issue specific warnings, (Miranda rights) to the person being arrested, or the statement will fail to be admitted into evidence. This rule and protocol was put in affect to properly protect the constitutional rights against forced self – incrimination and to secure the assistance of counsel in criminal proceedings. Even though these rights have been in effect since the signing of the Bill of Rights, the warnings incident to arrest developed 200myears later as a way of protecting the rights from encroachment by over aggressive law officials. (Ehow, 2012)…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays