Preview

Is Victor Frankenstein the Modern Prometheus?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Victor Frankenstein the Modern Prometheus?
Is Victor Frankenstein the modern Prometheus?

Mary Shelley’s purpose in the subtitle of her book, Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus is to compare Victor Frankenstein and Prometheus, son of Zeus. By showing many similarities between the two, she has solid reasoning that Dr. Frankenstein is, in many ways, the “modern Prometheus.” Although both main characters create a problem they have no control over, they learn their lesson of tampering with the law of nature. It takes time, punishment, and tests for the both of them to understand their wrongdoings. Shelley’s book shows many similarities between Victor and Prometheus. In the beginning we are led to believe that Victor is a scientist who, through experiment and analysis, has the ability to re-create life. By using metamorphosis he uses old cadaver body parts to create an oversized and grotesque creature (Shelley, par. 91). Like Prometheus, Frankenstein created something he had no power or control over. Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to humans, not only once but twice. In doing so, they both went against all laws of nature.
While Victor Frankenstein created a nonhuman creature and Prometheus stole fire from the gods they were both punished very severely. After Dr. Frankenstein brought his creature to life, out of disgust, he ran away. “How can I describe my emotions at this catastrophe, or how delineate the wretch whom with such infinite pains and care I had endeavored to form?” (Shelley, par. 121). Frankenstein could not stand the sight of his creation. Looking at it made him queasy and ill. The monster’s oversized body and unsightly proportions brought Victor much agony. The creature, feeling abandoned, turned to rage and attacked Victor’s loved ones. His first victim was William Frankenstein, Victor’s beloved brother. Giving Victor little time to repair from his tragic loss, the creature attacked again. This time he lost his best friend, Henry Clerval. During these catastrophic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein and Prometheus don’t even tell the same story. They both have unique characters, and the setting is totally different. Despite the differences, I saw many similarities in the themes, plot and characters of the movie. Many of the characters have similar character traits to those of Victor Frankenstein and the Creation.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Composed during the Industrial Revolution at a time of increased scientific experimentation, Shelley warns and forebodes her enlightened society of the consequences which come about from playing god. She uses Victor Frankenstein as her platform, whose self-exalting line “many excellent natures would owe their being to me” represents a society engrossed with reanimation. Recurring mythical allusions to Prometheus, “how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge” portray Victor as a tragic hero; a noble character whose “fatal flaw” of blind ambition ultimately results in his own downfall and dehumanization, “swallowed up every habit of my nature”. In addition, Victor’s impulsive rejection of his grotesque creation, leads to the Monster’s rebellion (“vowed eternal hated and vengeance to all mankind”).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite being disturbed, the Monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, was fully aware of his capabilities and his own strength even when ostracised from society. Evidence of this is when Shelley writes “I could, with pleasure, have destroyed the cottage and its inhabitants and glutted myself with their shrieks and misery”. Here, the monster would of indulged himself by murdering the DeLacy family and wouldn’t bare any signs of a guilty conscience. This bares similarity to the story of Prometheus, which was popular in the 1800s, when Frankenstein was first written. Prometheus stole fire from Greek gods to give to man so they could advance in evolution. As punishment for this, he was chained to a mountain and was regularly attacked by animal. He knew that even though the eagle would eat his liver, he was aware of his capabilities and anticipated it would grow back. Furthermore, the phrase, ‘glutted myself’ implies that the monster would of relished seeing the DeLacy family die and scream with horror and pain and presents his disturbed nature perfectly. Moreover, Shelley would of wanted to include this, so the reader began to despise the monster for enjoying such a disgusting crime.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shelley’s Gothic novel, Frankenstein, explores the complex nature of mankind by considering the consequences of an unrestricted pursuit of science. A rise in scientific experimentation with Galvanism during Shelley’s time is reflected through the protagonist Victor as he uses it to bestow life. Shelley portrays Victor and the Creature as complex beings, demonstrating both inhuman and human qualities. Despite this, the subsequent rejection by his creator and the De Lacy family drives the Creature to ‘eternal rejection and vengeance of mankind’. Victor’s initial response when meeting the creature, demonstrates his savage, cruel treatment and lack of responsibility towards his creation.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As ironic as it seems, and for the many differences shown between Victor and the Monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, there are also various similarities between these two characters. The way they want to learn, they way they used to love but now hate the world, and the great sense of remorse they feel at the end. Both, Victor and the Monster, had a great desire for learning. For Victor it was more about studying and becoming fully educated in the sciences. As for the monster however: he was more interested in learning about human life, “but how was this possible when [the monster] did not even understand the sounds for which they stood as signs?” (p. 98) He learned to speak from listening and learning from humans talk. For Victor “natural philosophy, and particularly chemistry… became nearly his sole occupation.” They are both extremely fast learners and were able to learn the things they studied very quickly.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pursuit of scientific knowledge and advancement has led man to challenge established values and assume an omnipotent role, often without forethought to the subsequent consequences. Both Tyrell and Frankenstein assume powers of the divine in their respective texts. Each of the characters in the creator roles are portrayed as being isolated from the world and therefore judged as being insufficient to hold divine power. Frankenstein is derivative of the ‘Promethean Myth’ with Victor challenging the role of nature and consequently being punished for his…

    • 910 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The romantic writer Mary Shelley published Frankenstein, in 1818. Her novel encompasses sympathy between a tragic science creation of a monster and his creator, Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein is written in two parts, first from the narration of Frankenstein himself, then from the view of the monster, which allows in depth analysis of the characters feelings. Shelly uses sympathy and beauty to illustrate the dynamic relationship between Frankenstein and his creation.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and his horrid creation had various aspects in common that one might not notice. Despite the fact that the two parted ways they still shared parallel similarities between one another. These similarities would eventually lead to the downfall of both characters in the end of the novel due to the choices they made throughout the book.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Victor Frankenstein was obsessed with unlocking the “mysteries of creation”. He expresses this by saying, “I collected the instruments of life around me, that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifeless thing that lay at my feet.”For Frankenstein, this is an immoral act that goes against all the laws of nature, as he is in no position to be performing this practice. He is overstepping his limits as a mortal by performing the action of an immortal; essentially, he’s “playing God”. Shelley uses this as an allusion to the Legend of Prometheus. Prometheus was affectionate of his creation, man. For them, he stole fire from the heavens and gifted it to them, much to Zeus’s dismay. Here as well, Prometheus overstepped his limits by taking from a higher deity, just as Frankenstein did in a different way. Shelley uses this allusion to show that both characters have gone farther than their morals dictate, both through the underlying theme of creation. Blinded by their ambition towards creation, they both went against the laws of nature; Frankenstein through the actual practice of creation, and Prometheus through gifting the fire. By overstepping their limits, both Frankenstein and Prometheus have set themselves up for some severe repercussions to their…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s (1797-1851) Frankenstein; Or the Modern Prometheus (1818), Victor Frankenstein creates a fiend out the dead body parts. Frankenstein, as a product of the Enlightenment and the Scientific Revolution, is obsessed with advancing the cause of science, and in becoming famous and respected."A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me. I might in process of time (although I now found it impossible) renew life where death had apparently devoted the body to corruption ”(Shelley 48). This modern day Prometheus, succeeds in doing what no man has done before, create life. The man he creates is contrary to what Victor envisioned. “How can I describe my emotions at this catastrophe, or how delineate the wretch whom with such infinite pains and care I had endeavoured to form? His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful! Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shrivelled complexion and straight black lips”(Shelley 51). After his creation comes to life, he refuses to accept his (parental) obligation; he does not care for the fiend, he does not provide it with shelter nor with food or love. He fails to teach and to instruct dismissing a relationship with his creature. Instead, in disgust of what he has done, Victor abandons “the fiend.” The fiend attempts to live a normal life; however, being abandon leaves the monster confused, afraid, left to his own devices, and angry. "'I am…

    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sympathy In Frankenstein

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley and first published in 1818, follows the set of extraordinary events encompassing the life of Victor Frankenstein; natural philosophy devotee and reanimation pioneer. Characterization plays a major role in encouraging different attitudes in Frankenstein, an example being how the reader is encouraged to feel sympathy for Frankenstein and his creation throughout the novel. Aided by the differing narrative perspective, these sympathies are continually evolving, changing as the reader’s perception of the two is altered, and at the end of the novel, the reader is left questioning who the real monster is: Frankenstein, or his creation? The…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein presents that Victor’s creation is a monster and that is not true. The true monster in this story is Dr. Victor Frankenstein. Victor had one goal in creating his creature and that was to gain fame and to gain praise from his creation. The one difference that separates Victor and the Creature apart is that Victor thought that the creature was still evil in the end, but the creature realized that what he had done was…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus, was first published anonymously January 1st, 1818. Although a work of gothic science fiction, Mary Shelly incorporated a multitude of sociological events that occurred between the late eighteen-century and the early nineteen-century; most specifically, the themes of this literary work and the characterization of the protagonist Victor Frankenstein, which integrate aspects that affected both Mary Shelly’s personal life and the European continent.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Marilyn Butler. Frankenstein, or, The modern Prometheus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. Print.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The subtitle to the novel Frankenstein is The Modern Prometheus. This gives us a clear suggestion that scientific discoveries are double edged . prometheus gave mankind fire, which can light, burn and destroy. In creating the monster Frankenstein gives mankind power of life over death and curse. Although the Greek Prometheus myth touched on relationship of man, god and nature, shelleys work was its insight into the characteristics of scientific inquiry, something becoming just apparent in her times and clearly in ours.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays