Preview

Jane Doe, Asylum / Gonzalez v. Reno

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jane Doe, Asylum / Gonzalez v. Reno
UNIT 3 ASSIGNMENT
To: Professor, Meegan Zickus
From: Jennifer Guerrieri
Date: January 19, 2014
Re: Jane Doe, Asylum
Subject: Case Brief: Gonzalez v. Reno, 212 F.3d. 1338 (2000)
Facts:
The plaintiff a minor alien who survived a tragedy at sea, was rescued and placed in the custody of his great uncle, a temporary legal custodian. His great uncle filed several asylum applications on his behalf against the wishes of the minor's father in Cuba. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) rejected the applications as void. The plaintiff appealed to the district court, which was dismissed because the father was the only one that could apply for his asylum case. The plaintiff appealed stating that the INS had violated §1158 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996. The issue here was whether a non parental relative could apply or submit an application for asylum on behalf of the plaintiff against parental wishes.
Issue:
1) Whether a temporary legal custodian, can file on behalf of a six (6) year old child, who lacks the capacity to file for himself, against the wishes of his father (sole survivor).
Rule:
1) 8 USC § 1158
§1158 Asylum
(a) Authority to apply for asylum
(1) In general. Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225 (b) of this title.
Analysis:
The issue here is whether a non-custodial parent could submit an application for asylum on a minors behalf against the wishes of the minor's father. The ruling of the court states that under §1158 Asylum, Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Department became involved with this family on 6/19/15, a 51A was filed and supported for neglect of Issaac by Father, after Krystal called the police, stating that James was trying to hurt her. Krystal left the home with the child after the police came to the home.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe case they address the idea of prayer in school, specifically prayer before a sporting event. On June 19, 2000 the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled (6–3) that the Texas school policy that permitted “student-led, student-initiated prayer” before varsity high-school football games was a violation of the First Amendment's.…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We understand from the CPS assessment and interview with (SU) there was a safety plan initiated involving the paternal aunt as a Safety Service Provider (SSP). Mother and child stayed with her as father already had planned to stay with a relative. It is reported and documented that father had his bags packed by the time LEA and CPS went to the home on October 8, 2015. We understand the safety plan was in place for less than a week as mother then moved back home with child and agreed to have friends check in on her. Parents were very cooperative and able to plan parenting time accordingly and were in the process of initiating divorce/custody proceedings. Our understanding is the father was never restricted from contact with the child by DHS—on the night of October 8, 2015 we understand Mr. Lasich stated he would stay away from his sister’s home until everything was sorted out.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Sessions v. Morales-Santana deals with the issue of whether or not a distinction based on gender in establishing derivative citizenship for immigrants violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection. The questions presented by this case are: (1) Whether Congress’s decision to require different physical presence requirements for unwed citizen mothers than unwed citizen fathers in order to pass citizenship to a foreign- born child violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection and (2) whether the court of appeals was mistaken in granting citizenship in the absence of any statutory authority.Thusly, the rights of immigrants and the right against gender discrimination are both at stake for the petitioner of this case. The case was granted on June 28, 2016, oral argument was held before the Supreme Court on November 9, 2016, and the case was decided on June 12, 2017.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court made a judgment that affected the California users of medical marijuana. Under a law the federal Controlled Substance Act, marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance, however under a 1996 state California law, marijuana is legalized for usage for people who have a prescription from a doctor for medical usage. When the federal Drug Enforcement Administration enforced the CSA by destroying one of the defendant's marijuana plants, the defendants claimed that their constitutional rights were infringed upon.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you may know there are many people enraged about the decision that was made with the case of Brock Turner. Riots and other violent methods have been used to get certain points across; and I believe the best way to appropriately get points across with you is writing a letter. There have been accusations made claiming it was a case of male and class privilege. Was the six-month confinement in a county jail and three years of probation enough for the crime that Brock Turner committed? I understand that sanctions vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but sexual assault is something to be taken very seriously no matter the outcome of the situation, in this situation hurting the athlete’s reputation…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Baker V. Canada

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In conclusion, Ms. Baker [through her lawyer] was so courageous at the Supreme Court, she upheld the fact that the interest of her four Canadian-born children should be considered. Eventually, the law turned in her favor, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the importance of valuing the rights, needs and interest of children in decisions affecting them, and this decisions represent an important advance in the development of Canadian immigration proceedings especially where the interest of the child is at…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Terri Schiavo Case

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Terri Schiavo 'Responsive ' Until Death. 'This is a case of throwing away a disabled person '." Life Site News, 2005-APR-01.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of Miranda v. Arizona dealt with the question, “Does the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination violate the Fifth Amendment?” This case started in 1963, when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for robbing $8 from a bank worker, and was charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While Miranda was in police custody, he signed a written confession to the robbery, and also to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days before the robbery. After being convicted, Miranda’s lawyer appealed; on the basis that the defendant did not know he was protected from self-incrimination and therefore did not have to confess to his crimes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christ K. Nevels is a 10 year old minor of interest in this case. Visitation rights are proposed as follows:…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    exclusion and who is the parent of a U.S. citizen child, to authorize an immigration…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Central American families encounter overwhelming obstacles to due process in detention; for example, the process of expedited removal places families who are eligible for asylum at risk of deportation. Although refugees in removal proceedings have the right to legal aid, nearly 40% of all detention facilities are located 60 miles or from a metro area (Human Rights First, 2011). Because its difficult to access legal services, roughly 84% of women and children face their removal proceedings without representation (Srikantiah, Hausman, & Weissman-Ward, 2015). Although the immigration judge and opposing counsel are obligated to educate detainees on the asylum process, this seldom occurs.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miranda v Arizona

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The suspect must give a clear answer to these questions. Silence isn’t acceptable as waiving these rights because the arrestee might not understand or speak English as his/her first language. If the Miranda Warnings has to be translated for a suspect, the translation is usually recorded. If the person implies at anytime prior to or during questioning, he/she wants to remain silent the interrogation must end. If the person says that they want an attorney, the interrogation must come to an end, until an attorney is present. At this time the person must have a chance to confer with their attorney and their attorney must be present during questioning. If the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of their Miranda Rights and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant’s criminal trial.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluation Letter

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    extern in the Office of the General Counsel of the XYZ Corporation, January 3 through April 22,…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays