Preview

Japan's Nuclearisation

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3591 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Japan's Nuclearisation
What is the future for Japan and its nuclear capability?

When North Korea declared the use of uranium enrichment on an industrial scale it caused international unease. This revelation brought to light the on-going issue of state’s nuclear capability. In a post-Cold war era the global arena is wary of any nuclear movement or development within states. An international non-proliferation treaty entered into force in 1970 holding the signatures of the nuclear states; the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Russia and China. It promotes cooperation and the goal of nuclear disarmament in an age where states arm themselves to deter other states from resorting to the use of nuclear weapons. Japan “is what non-proliferation specialists call a “threshold” nuclear weapons state – a …[state] that could stage a nuclear breakout virtually overnight should its electorate and leadership resolve to do so” (Holmes, 2012). For the purpose of this essay, the term nuclear will cover both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons as uranium can form both.

The Manhattan Project from 1942 to 1946 was commissioned to develop the atomic bomb, costing over two billion dollars, leading to the creation of four nuclear weapons. Theoretical Physicist Robert Oppenheimer declared, after the first nuclear test named ‘Trinity’, “now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds” (Oppenheimer, 1945). This encapsulates the following events, in just a month the United States dropped two nuclear weapons upon Japan, on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, creating destruction within miles of the drop site. This devastation ended World War Two, however it triggered the tensest war to date, the Cold War. The Cold War brought about a new language and struck a new fear within governments, if a nuclear war broke out, the effects would destroy the majority of the international arena. This led to the creation of nuclear non-proliferation treaties; each state would sign a declaration not to use their nuclear



Bibliography: Cortazzi, H. (1993) Modern Japan: A Concise Survey. The MacMillan Press Ltd: London Halliday, J Hane, M. (1996) Eastern Phoenix: Japan since 1945. Westview Press: United States Herman, S Holmes, J. (2012) Japan: Joining the Nuclear Weapons Club? It could [Online] Available from: http://thediplomat.com/the-naval-diplomat/2012/10/22/japan-joining-the-nuclear-weapons-club-it-could/ [Accessed 1 May 2013] Hook, G., Gilson, J., Hughes, C Horsley, W. and Buckley, R. (1990) Nippon New Superpower: Japan since 1945. BBC Books: London Ilenda, R Kakuchi, S. (2013) Tug-of-war over Nuclear Future [Online] Available from: http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/03/tug-of-war-over-nuclear-future/ [Accessed on 1 May 2013] Krieger, D Kyodo, AP. (2013) North Korea May Start Up Reactor Soon [Online] Available from: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/05/03/asia-pacific/north-korea-may-start-up-reactor-soon/#.UYKrVrWyDzw [Accessed 2 May 2013] Oettinger, G Oppenheimer, R. (1945) I Am Become Death [Online] Available from: http://www.faktoider.nu/oppenheimer_eng.html [Accessed on 8 May 2013] Ricking, C Rudd, K. (2008) Japan and the Future of Nuclear Disarmament [Online] Available from: http://www.fpif.org/articles/japan_and_the_future_of_nuclear_disarmament [Accessed on 1 May 2013] Takubo, M Toki, M. (2008) Japan and the Future of Nuclear Disarmament [Online] Ed. Feffer, J. Available from: http://www.fpif.org/articles/japan_and_the_future_of_nuclear_disarmament [Accessed on 1 May 2013] Trento, J Waltz, K. N. (1995) ‘More May be Better.’ In The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate, by Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz. W. Norton & Company: New York

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Moral dimension of U.S. nuclear weapons policy held prominent place in International relations during the Cold War….…

    • 556 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Bergamini returns to several of Butow’s traditional arguments to prove his claims. Agreeing with Butow’s statement that the use of the bomb would leave Japan “practically powerless”, Bergamini writes that the atomic bomb lead to Emperor Hirohito’s decision to surrender. Returning to Butow’s claims Bergamini expands the traditionalist perspective by examining the influence that the atomic bomb had on emperor Hirohito’s decision to terminate the war. Providing evidence to his claims, Bergamini writes that while Hirohito believed that Japan could continue the war until the fall of 1945. He affirms the traditional opinion that the atomic bomb motivated the surrender by quoting Hirohito’s remarks to General MacArthur. Citing Hirohito’s statement that the atomic bomb “gave Japan an excuse to surrender”, the author offers historians with an additional account to consider for what motivated Japan’s surrender. Bergamini’s statements advance the traditionalist view of Japan’s motive to surrender by demonstrating Hirohito’s power in starting the war with the United States. Leaving historians to consider the influence of the emperor, the author shows how the atomic bomb moved Hirohito to…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butow's Argument Analysis

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Butow’s research on Marcus Kido’s influence on the emperor to accept terms that presented “peace and honor,” influences Feis’ argument. Feis claims that Kido’s ability to persuade Hirohito was crucial in moving Japan towards the choice to surrender. Feis takes a different approach to Butow’s thoughts on Kido’s efforts to surrender; with the understanding that the Japanese public would only end the war if the United States allowed the country to keep the emperor. Investigating Butow’s original claims, Feis identifies that the United States would not move from its demands for unconditional surrender. He argues that due to the country’s internal struggles, Japan directly prolonged the war. Feis argument allows him to question if the United States had not used the atomic bomb would Japan had surrender assembled in August 1945. This approach to history from a military aspect moved the topic of the decision to surrender in a new direction. Feis presents the question of whether the atomic bombs played an essential role in the decision-making that led to the Japanese’s surrender. Feis concludes his arguments by presenting the idea that Japan’s decision to surrender came from the threat that if the war lasted any longer, the United States would use a third atomic bomb. The author broadens the study of Japan’s decision through the understanding that the United States used the atomic bombs as a means to motivate Japan to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hanley, Charles J. "Abolishing Nukes: Flicker of Hope to Global Cause." Msnbc.com. The Associated Press, 2010. Web. 10 Aug. 2014.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truman Decision

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages

    President Harry S. Truman decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan is perhaps the most controversial act of policy in United States history. One of the many different reasons given for the use of this weapon was the shock effect it would produce in the Japanese foreign policy circle. While the shock of the Japanese will be discussed later, it is important to note that it had a similar effect on the west. This shock effect has caused countless authors to speculate as to the motivation behind, and effects of this revolutionary weapon.…

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The advent of nuclear weapons dawned a new and terrifying era in human history. The destructive power of the atomic bomb, demonstrated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ushered in a global climate of fear. Emerging from the rubble of the Second World War, the U.S. and Soviet Union became the two most dominant economic, political, and military superpowers in the global arena. Upholding fundamental ideological differences, the U.S. and Soviet Union became entrenched in their respective camps of capitalism and communism. Having acquired nuclear weapons, and illustrated their ability to use them, the U.S challenged the Soviet Union’s military might. The Soviet Union promptly accepted this challenge by successfully acquiring nuclear capabilities on par with the U.S. In effect, a nuclear arms race ensued and the Cold War began. Fear of nuclear annihilation ultimately swept across the globe and into the homes of American citizens.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of May 8, 1945, the conflict in Europe has come to a halt. We are now on track to eliminate the threat that the Japanese pose to our democracy and our ways of life. Since Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 we have lost over 100,000 soldiers in an attempt to secure our position in the pacific. This loss of American life in the pacific combined with the causalities suffered in Europe has been far too great. Japanese soldiers and government show no sign of surrender, or an indication that they are willing to surrender. Despite the obviously devastating effect a nuclear bomb would have on innocent people, all options must be assessed in order to preserve American lives. It is clear from communicating with Japanese diplomats located in Portugal that unconditional surrender is not a…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan’s goal of achieving fukoku kyohei, “rich country; strong military”, fuelled major political, economic and social changes during the Meiji Restoration. By the 20th century, Japan had a modern constitution and national parliament, though it was not truly democratic. The modernization of the nation also made Japan richer and more economically stable, with a structured education system. Japan, an impotent, closed feudal state, was transformed into a formidable nation focused on nationalism.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the chrysalids

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The nuclear arms race: a competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language as aTool of War

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: John Berger. “Hiroshima”. The Mc-Graw Hill Reader: Issues across the Disciplines. Ed. Gilbert Muller. New York: McGraw Hill. 2014. 7-13. Print.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Beasley, W. (1990). The Rise of Modern Japan- Political, Economic and Social Chnage Since 1850. London, England: Butler and Tanne rLtd.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cold War and Us Diplomacy

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Cohen, A. (1986). Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Japanese Mythology

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Webster, R.G. Japan: from the old to the new. S.W. Patridge & Co., 1905, 1978…

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays