The Chinese Immigration Act, 1923 served its intended purpose – between 1924 and 1936 fewer than ten people immigrated to Canada from China. As a result of the “continuous journey regulation” amendment to the Immigration Act in 1908 immigration to Canada from India did not once exceed 100 persons annually prior to 1936. Japanese immigration to Canada also fell sharply after the 1908 amendment to the Immigration Act. The reasons given by the federal government to justify instituting such restrictive measures on Asian immigrants were based largely on self-serving interests, or were used to pacify anti-Asian sentiment in British Columbia. The federal government rationalized the “In the Pocket” measure as a means for immigrants from Asia to support themselves and their families in the event they could not find immediate employment. The amendment to the Immigration Act, 1910, was deemed justifiable because it enabled the federal government to “deport individuals…on the grounds of political and moral
The Chinese Immigration Act, 1923 served its intended purpose – between 1924 and 1936 fewer than ten people immigrated to Canada from China. As a result of the “continuous journey regulation” amendment to the Immigration Act in 1908 immigration to Canada from India did not once exceed 100 persons annually prior to 1936. Japanese immigration to Canada also fell sharply after the 1908 amendment to the Immigration Act. The reasons given by the federal government to justify instituting such restrictive measures on Asian immigrants were based largely on self-serving interests, or were used to pacify anti-Asian sentiment in British Columbia. The federal government rationalized the “In the Pocket” measure as a means for immigrants from Asia to support themselves and their families in the event they could not find immediate employment. The amendment to the Immigration Act, 1910, was deemed justifiable because it enabled the federal government to “deport individuals…on the grounds of political and moral