Preview

Jefferson and Hamilton: Friendship and Conflict among the Founding Fathers

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jefferson and Hamilton: Friendship and Conflict among the Founding Fathers
Patriots Pen Draft One If you were to paint a portrait of the Founding Father 's from the average American 's mind, the final result would depict a group of heroic men marching into battle, defeating the dastardly British, and writing the Constitution all in one sitting. Everything would be tinted with rosy hues of red, white, and blue, and patriotic music sounds in the background…right? Wrong. In 1789, a passionate disagreement broke out between Jefferson and Hamilton over the French Revolution. Jefferson and his Republican supporters were in favor of joining the revolutionaries, while Hamilton and the Federalists called for a neutral stance in relation to the fighting. This lead to the bisection of a previously cooperative government into two warring parties. In 1804, Hamilton, who had a disagreement with Jefferson 's vice-president Aaron Burr, agreed to a duel in the outskirts of Weehawken, New Jersey. While Hamilton had reservations about actually firing, Burr did not. He drew his gun and promptly shot Hamilton in the abdomen. Hamilton died the next day. In 1808, the Founding Fathers supposedly ended the slave trade by passing legislation eradicating slavery in all the states north of the Potomac and prohibiting the expansion of slavery into the Northwest Territory. However, they turned a blind eye to the states south of the Potomac, where nine-tenths of the slaves resided. The bloody Civil War ultimately resulted, leading to the deaths of at least 618,000 young American men. There is endless evidence to be heaped upon the growing pile of failures. Of 21 Founding Fathers studied, 14 had owned slaves. This slaveholders included people such as Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington. Besides Hamilton, two other Founding Fathers were killed in duels. Countless petty arguments resulted in wide fissures of disagreement. In light of all this, what would I say? Thank you. The Founding Fathers were not perfect


Cited: "Casualties In The Civil War." Casualties In The Civil War. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Did the Founding Fathers Screw Up?" The American Prospect. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis." Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "The Founding Fathers and Slavery (Founding Fathers)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "The Founding Fathers Fallacy." Penn Political Review. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Friendship and Conflict: The Relationship of the U.S. "Founding Fathers"" Student Pulse. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . " ." Our Founding Fathers Sacrificed for the United States of America. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Political Battles." Political Battles. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Differences Between Jefferson And Hamilton In The Constitutional Convention
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Differences Between Jefferson And Hamilton In The Constitutional Convention

    In conclusion, Hamilton and Jefferson have many differences. They also had some things in common. They will work together but will have some disagreement. Either way they will try to work it out. If you are wondering, there are more difference between them than having things in…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton
    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

    Hamilton wanted a strong government whereas Jefferson believed in an agricultural and mainly country side democracy. By the end of Reconstruction, the dominance of a central government had been demonstrated by the Union’s victory of the Civil War and one currency serving the entire nation. Alexander Hamilton is thought of as the father of the New York Stock Exchange.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Political Views of Jefferson vs. Hamilton
    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Political Views of Jefferson vs. Hamilton

    They both stood for opposing political sides, Hamilton a solid federalist, while Jefferson was an anti-federalist, or republican. Their political differences helped shaped their separate images clearly throughout history. Hamilton believed that a strong central government was the key to the government’s success and had a loose interpretation of the constitution and thus concurred that civil liberties and other aspects of the constitution should at times, be restricted. Jefferson believed in a strict version of the constitution, he opposed of Hamilton’s creation of the national bank and believed it to be unconstitutional. As key additions to the government, they also had a different outlook on the people of the country. Jefferson maintained faith in the people, yet distrusted special privilege among them. Hamilton however, believed that the power should rest in the wealthy and educated and wished to raise voting qualifications. Economically, Hamilton wanted a solid balance of agriculture, trade, and manufacturing to nurture the country. Jefferson on the other hand, believed that agriculture alone should be the backbone of our economy. He believed that states alone should manage their economic growth without the government stepping in or helping, whereas Hamilton thought the opposite. He believed in the creation of the national bank and internal taxation, brought forth by the central government.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparision Of The Political Parties Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparision Of The Political Parties Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were on opposing sides when Hamilton announced plans for a national bank. They both organized themselves into 2 political parties: Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Alexander Hamilton stood for the interests of seaports, while Thomas Jefferson spoke for rural and southern interests. Primarily the debate between Jefferson and Hamilton was about concerns of power of the central government and power of states. Federalists were in favor of government power, while the Republicans favored states’ power.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Founding Brothers by Joseph J. Ellis Essay
    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Founding Brothers by Joseph J. Ellis Essay

    The founding fathers, or as the book calls them the founding brothers, are an assorted group of men from wildly different backgrounds. In political terms, they were divided. Yet, they came to together to help shape this country into the place it is today. Now on their journey towards the making of this country they did encounter some trouble. They encountered heated debates among themselves though for getting through these debates they show just why they deserve to be called, founding brothers.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Did The Constitution Mean To Early Americans Summary
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Did The Constitution Mean To Early Americans Summary

    In the book, What Did the Constitution Mean to Early Americans?, Edward Countryman, the general editor, selects and introduces five reading selections by authors including Isaac Kramnick, Stephen E. Patterson, Gordon S. Wood, Jan Lewis, and Jack Rakove. Countryman’s purpose is to demonstrate to students the method historians use to examine historical issues and problems. This book is a series of related essays and the main topic addressed is how different kinds of people in America responded and debated about the Constitution and why historians have difficulties deciding any single meaning the founding generation of Americans might have held.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hamilton v jefferson
    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    hamilton v jefferson

    Everywhere in American history, there are differences in ideas on how to run a country. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were no exception while they were members of George Washington’s cabinet. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton both had opposite views on how to run the country. Jefferson was the Secretary of State and an Anti-Federalist and Hamilton was Treasure of State and a Federalist making them opposite political parties and hating each other. The Federalist were a group of wealthy people and pro strong federal power, on the other hand anti-Federalist were pro protecting the state and equality for all people. Both these men wanted to run the country in the way of their political party. Both men had similar and opposing views on the Constitution, economic issues, and individual rights for people. The opposing views between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the separation of the political parties.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Views Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton During The 1790s
    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Views Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton During The 1790s

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were opposing forces during the 1790’s. Thomas Jefferson was one of the first democratic-republican politicians in American History. He protected the rights of individuals while many of Hamilton’s positions were centered around the federal government. Hamilton was a federalist so it was no secret that many of his stances supported a strong central government. Hamilton was more focused on order while Jefferson’s interests lied in the heart of freedom.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roger Jefferson Character Analysis
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roger Jefferson Character Analysis

    Which made their rivalry even more intense. Hamilton was an intense Federalist in favor of a very powerful federal government. Madison was a Democratic-Republican, so he was in favor of states rights. Burr was a little different, he mostly cared about how to gain power and once joined the other party to improve his chances of becoming president he stayed with Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans for most of his political career. The first rift between Hamilton and Jefferson started when they were selected to serve as cabinet members, Hamilton as Treasury secretary and Jefferson as Secretary of State. Since they had such wildly different viewpoints they often fought. Hamilton, a very egotistical person, sometimes even called a narcissist, attacked Jefferson’s character to demean him during cabinet meetings. Burr and Hamilton were both very well known public figures who were even friends until Burr ran for a Senate seat and beat out Hamilton's father in law. In the article Mr. Kennedy explains how he believes this wasn't a direct act of aggression to Hamilton, as some historians believe, showing just one claim of bias in this analysis. Burr and Jefferson's conflict started in the election of 1800. To make it brief, The voting process was different back then. Jefferson and Burr tied for the most votes and instead of stepping aside for Jefferson, Burr made an attempt at the Presidency. And in order to break the tie, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson, which made electors swing their vote to Jefferson, breaking the tie. This was just one reason Burr challenged Hamilton to duel. Hamilton saw Jefferson as the lesser of two evils, even going as far as saying Burr was a “mischievous enemy.” The 18th century equivalent of calling someone a liar and a fraud on television today. These three men disliked each other a great deal and showed it to the press, and to one…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summer Of 1787 Summary
    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summer Of 1787 Summary

    It’s easy to find yourself following a predetermined path, a basic template that is rooted in every person’s mind by the age of 10. We go to elementary school, then middle school, then high school, where we start trying to get good grades for the first time to get into a decent college, graduate with a major or two, start internships, get a stable job, etc. At what point did we stop believing our innocent declarations of being an astronaut or being President of the United States? In The Summer of 1787, the author explores the long drawn out process of making the Constitution. He gives insight on each character that contributed and shows the extreme level of dedication and determination every single one of them had.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton Vs. Jefferson's Views On The French Revolution
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton Vs. Jefferson's Views On The French Revolution

    Jefferson and Hamilton had arguments and different beliefs, except for their changing views on the French Revolution. Jefferson was in France at the time, siding with France, while Hamilton was the country secretary of the Treasury,…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Alexander Hamilton And Thomas Jefferson
    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Alexander Hamilton And Thomas Jefferson

    Their views on human nature, form of government, ideal economy, the Constitution, etc, were nowhere near similar. For instance, the two leaders’ viewpoint on the best form of government were distinct from each other. I think that Hamilton and Jefferson should have combined both of their perspectives together to create the best government they could. Both of them had good ideas on how it should be run or by who. However, one was strong and the other was a little weak. Hamilton’s view on the government to me is a cliche. When it comes to running a country or even a small business, the only people who are believed to run them the best are rich, intelligent men. If you think about it thoroughly, these men probably didn’t start out wealthy until they were given jobs and became greedy with the money they earned. I think men would have to be smart, but don’t have to be wealthy to run a government or business. Jefferson had a very unique view on government. I thought it was clever to have a government that isn’t so strict so the people could enjoy their freedom, while Hamilton wanted a strong government. The only thing that could go wrong with Jefferson’s government, is eventually people will start to take advantage of all the freedom they have, which could lead to chaos in the…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founding Brothers Summary
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Founding Brothers Summary

    “The Founding Brothers,” by Joseph J. Ellis, described many great conflicting events throughout the American Revolution and assessed other certain events in the decade following the Constitutional Convention in 1787. These conflicting events profoundly impacted the early development of the United States. Some of these events include ADD EVENTS.Significant figures such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Aaron Burr, and Alexander Hamilton played huge roles in this book. As well as the idea of colonial independence from great revolutionaries stating that the separation was not only possible but also fated in the fact that it was bound to happen some point throughout history.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Richard Beeman Plain Honest Men Analysis
    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Richard Beeman Plain Honest Men Analysis

    Starting on May 25th of 1787 and lasting until September 17th of 1787 the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution is an integral part of American history. Moreover, the study of American history tends to neglect mentioning the “behind the scenes” that progressed the creation of America’s federated Constitutional Republic. “Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution” by Richard Beeman is designed to demonstrate the diversity amongst Founding Fathers’ beliefs, intentions, and contributions to the Constitution and government. The narrative styled historical nonfiction follows the Constitutional Conventions of the late 1700’s including detailed debates surrounding slavery, representation, treasury, and ultimately…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hofstadter Chapter 1
    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hofstadter Chapter 1

    Hofstadter Summary: "The Founding Fathers: The Age of Realism" Summary of Section: I The reasoning behind the Constitution of the United States is presented as "based upon the philosophy of Hobbes and the religion of Calvin. It assumes the natural state of mankind in a state of war, and that the carnal mind is at enmity with God." Throughout, the struggle between democracy and tyranny is discussed as the Founding Fathers who envisioned the Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787 believed not in total democracy, but instead saw common man as selfish and contemptuous, and therefore in need of a "a good political constitution to control him." Being a largely propertied body, with the exception of William Few, who was the only one who could honestly be said to represent the majority yeoman farmer class, the highly privileged classes were fearful of granting man his due rights, as the belief that "man was an unregenerate rebel who has to be controlled" reverberated. However, the Fathers were indeed "intellectual heirs" of the seventeenth-century England republicanism with its opposition to arbitrary rule and faith in popular sovereignty. Thus, the paradoxical fears of the advance in democracy, and of a return to the extreme right emerged. The awareness that both military dictatorship and a return to monarchy were being seriously discussed in some quarters propelled the Constitutional framers such as John Jay to bring to attention. II Consistent to eighteenth-century ethos left the Constitution-makers with great faith in universals. They believed in an inexorable view of a self-interested man. Feeling that all me were naturally inclined to be bad they sought a compromising system of checks and balances for government. This was bolstered by the scientific work by Newton, "in which metaphors sprang as naturally to mens minds as did biological metaphors in the Darwinian atmosphere of the late nineteenth century." Therefore Madison and others thought to squelch…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More