The essays never seemed to end and there was never any information that grabs the reader’s attention. Countryman’s goal to draw students into historical discussions and broaden their interest in history did not work that well. It seemed like the each essay would focus on one main idea and then expand and provide so much information that it was very easy to get lost in the essay and lose interest. For example, the first essay, “The ‘Great National Discussion’: The Discourse of Politics in 1787”, by Isaac Kramnick was very long and covered a lot of material, which made it very difficult to understand and
The essays never seemed to end and there was never any information that grabs the reader’s attention. Countryman’s goal to draw students into historical discussions and broaden their interest in history did not work that well. It seemed like the each essay would focus on one main idea and then expand and provide so much information that it was very easy to get lost in the essay and lose interest. For example, the first essay, “The ‘Great National Discussion’: The Discourse of Politics in 1787”, by Isaac Kramnick was very long and covered a lot of material, which made it very difficult to understand and