Preview

Jeffersonian vs. Federalists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
312 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jeffersonian vs. Federalists
Jeffersonian vs. the Federalists
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two of the most influential brilliant minds of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Although, Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed with each other continually, their different viewpoints developed the two most prominent branches of government leading to the separation of powers between state and central government. Hamilton was a strong outspoken federalist that believed the average people were not intelligent enough to make decisions the government makes, as oppose to Jefferson who believed the government should be ran by the people.
The federalists were mostly developed by high-class wealthy merchants, bankers, manufactures or professional men from New England and the Atlantic Seaboard, along with farmers and Southern planters. They admired the English aristocracy. Federalists considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government. They desired high voting qualifications claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy. They favored a broad interpretation of the constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of the state’s rights and wanted an expanding bureaucracy. The Jeffersonian for the most part were artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, or owners of small farms in the interior regions of the South and West. Their attitudes towards government were self-government and more democratic than that of the English. They believed they were capable of self government and they wanted to establish a small property owner’s democracy. They favored in freedom of speech and press. Hamilton spent his whole life career fighting the Jeffersonian people. He thought that the focal point of governing should be done by the federal government. The government and Jefferson’s ideals succeeded over Hamilton and the federalists. The government created the separation between powers and also passed the alien sedition acts of 1798. They were some of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why was Jefferson’s support focused mainly on the “common” man such as farmers? Jefferson’s support mainly focused on the “common” man because of the fact that he in fact was a farmer.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time period of 1801 to 1817, there were multiple issues in the United States ranging from wars to political boundaries. This time period saw the termination of the Federalist party. The conflicts were between two parties called the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Federalist party was officially started by John Adams. John Adams was also a loose constructionist just like all the other Federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government. On the other side, was Thomas Jefferson who was in office from 1801 to 1809. Jefferson started the Jeffersonian Republican party. The Jeffersonians were strict constructionists who believed in states rights. They said that anything that is not stated in the Constitution, is reserved for the states to decide. However, this was not always the case. The statement that the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists is partly accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. While any party is in office, that party will almost always be loose constructionists because each party in office wants more power. The Jeffersonians started out as strict constructionists but slowly turned into loose constructionists because they were in office for twenty years.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton thought that having one single president was the most ideal way to govern a nation. He believed that if you had a strong executive branch that kept the president in line that the problem of a dictatorship would never be a problem. Hamilton then discusses how to keep a strong executive by keeping its members united and supportive of each other so they keep their efficiency and control. Hamilton supported his ideas with roman history and how they tried to kept things in order with only one leader, he just made minor corrections to the flaws in their system. Hamilton also gave reasons why the government would fail with two leaders just like it did in Rome. In conclusion the federalist #70 discussed that one leader was the way Hamilton thought would make a strong united government that worked together and runs smoothly.…

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton believed that for the economy to grow, economic development had to be created and managed. He wanted to collect resources located all around North America and sell them to make a profit. Moving all these resources around would require management at a national level. Both Madison and Jefferson disagreed with Hamilton’s idea. Doing this would cost money and the country would be losing money instead of making a profit. They believed that the economy should recover and grow on its own.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton played a role in the constitutional convention. He wrote 51 out of 85 Federalist paper. His main problem was the national debt. Were he thought the government assume on the entire debt in the federal government and states. The speculators bought bond from the Revolutionary War veterans for 10 or 15 cents in dollars. He also debt a program that was remarkable to success. Hamilton economic vision was most closely predicted. By the way , Hamilton believed that the common people usually act foolishly. He believed the rich should be educated. Also the people that should be rule are the wellborn.Hamilton also wanted to raise the voting qualification higher. Hamilton established a national bank but wanted to maintain the internal taxes. He believed that the American could be a model on the British system. Hamilton will support the lost of…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the end of the American Revolution, two political gatherings ruled American administrative issues. Pioneers, for example, Alexander Hamilton, had trust in an in number focal government, while others shared the thoughts of Thomas Jefferson that the states should overpower the political system. These two strategies for understanding of government got to be empowered, isolated, and finally incited the plan of America's first political get-togethers. Alexander Hamilton completely confined in the necessity for a solid focal government. He had been an officer in the American outfitted power amid the Revolution, and saw coordinate the eventual outcomes of a weak fundamental force.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Their views on human nature, form of government, ideal economy, the Constitution, etc, were nowhere near similar. For instance, the two leaders’ viewpoint on the best form of government were distinct from each other. I think that Hamilton and Jefferson should have combined both of their perspectives together to create the best government they could. Both of them had good ideas on how it should be run or by who. However, one was strong and the other was a little weak. Hamilton’s view on the government to me is a cliche. When it comes to running a country or even a small business, the only people who are believed to run them the best are rich, intelligent men. If you think about it thoroughly, these men probably didn’t start out wealthy until they were given jobs and became greedy with the money they earned. I think men would have to be smart, but don’t have to be wealthy to run a government or business. Jefferson had a very unique view on government. I thought it was clever to have a government that isn’t so strict so the people could enjoy their freedom, while Hamilton wanted a strong government. The only thing that could go wrong with Jefferson’s government, is eventually people will start to take advantage of all the freedom they have, which could lead to chaos in the…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The national government was just beginning to work well, and after the ratification of the Constitution, the state and local governments still very strong. Hamilton, a lax Constitutionalist, wanted an organized strong central government, fearing anarchy without a central power. He felt one strong government would be able to deal with national problems much more efficiently than many state and local governments, in which strong divisions might arise. Jefferson wanted things to stay the way they were with the state and local governments in charge, fearing another monarchy. This caused him to become a strict Constitutionalist. By doing carefully analyzing the Constitution, Jefferson would be able to see any loopholes in it, allowing the state laws to override the federal laws.…

    • 580 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The more Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson disagreed the further they grew apart causing the people of the country to have to choose sides as the factions began to…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton understood that a strong central government would be needed to keep the fledgling country alive. In order to keep a strong government that understood the problems at hand, it needed to be run by first class, educated men. Hamilton also makes a good point in saying that, though Jeffersonians thought the rich would corrupt the government in order to profit for themselves, the rich had nothing to gain as they were already at the top of the social ladder. Whiele Hamilton was a realist, Jefferson was a romantic. He lagged…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, they both agreed that a unified, national government must be implemented, that personal property rights had to be protected, that the central government must be run by virtuous, patriotic people and that the Constitution had to open the way for commercial development through the creation of a national market, public credit and a standardized currency. However, they particularly disagreed in giving to the state a presidential office who had to have ”strength, vigor and energy”. But that was only a matter of perspective. For Hamilton, the presidency had to be the heart of the newly formed American state just as the monarch was in ancient European states. He saw a powerful, energetic state as a state based on commerce. For him, the prosperity of the commerce was the most useful and the most productive of a national wealth. Hence, he was preoccupied with the links between international politics, commerce and state…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson had a good point showing that the rich and wealthy and wellborn should not rule, and that was a big point of Hamilton’s I did not believe in but, overall Hamilton’s views on who should govern passed Jefferson. For example, Hamilton wanted to raise voting qualifications meaning he didn’t want it to be so easy for anyone to vote, and that is how it should be, not everyone should be able to vote, it should be a privilege, and having anyone be able to vote like Jefferson believed, could hurt the government and who runs…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both Jefferson and Hamilton were appointed to major political position; Jefferson became the Secretary of State while Hamilton became the Secretary of the Treasury. The two politicians clashed often: Hamilton was a Federalist and pro a larger national government, while Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican and believed in stronger state governments. Hamilton believed in an industrial-based economy, while Jefferson promoted an agriculturally-based economy. Hamilton was against French support in the French Revolution, while Jefferson supported the French cause. Because of this, it came as a surprise to many when Hamilton supported Jefferson for President in the election of 1800 over an old acquaintance of Hamilton, Aaron Burr. The two candidates tied, each with 73 Electoral College votes. The tiebreaker went to the House of Representatives, where Hamilton argued against Burr and promoted Jefferson as the “lesser of two evils” (Wikipedia). He helped convince the House to give Jefferson an edge over Burr, which led to both Jefferson winning the presidency and Burr becoming resentful about Hamilton. Four years later, Hamilton ruined Burr’s chance at becoming the governor of New York. Burr became infuriated at Hamilton for ravaging his political career, and challenged Hamilton to a duel to resolve the matter. As it was, in the early morning of July 11,…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays