Preview

Jewell v state case brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jewell v state case brief
Facts: Bridget Fisher bought a house in 1989 by herself. She married Barry Jewell, and he helped her fix the house. They lived together on and off and then married in 1990. Later, they got divorced and Jewell moved into his friend's apartment. When Jewell found out that Fisher was seeing another man, he told his friend that he wanted to beat her boyfriends head with a 2 by 4 and cut his dick off.

At 4:00 AM on June 13, 1991 Jewell broke into Fisher's house through the kitchen window after removing the screen. He walked to the bedroom where Fisher and her boyfriend Jones were sleeping. He struck Jones on the head with a 2 by 4 until he was unconscious and cut off his penis and fed it to the dog. Fisher awoke for the attack but thought it was a bad dream and went back to sleep. Later, during the investigation Fisher described the intruder as the same size and build as Jewell and was wearing a dark ski mask similar to the one she bought him. Also, Fisher reported a missing knife in her kitchen. A bloody 2 by 4 was found on the scene but, the bed sheets that were covered in blood were instructed to be thrown out by a police officer. Jones' penis was never found.

Issue: Barry Jewell was convicted of burglary with a deadly weapon resulting in serious bodily injury, a class A felony. Also, Battery resulting in serious bodily injury, a class C felony.

Rule: The court used the case, Ellyson V. State, 603 N.E.2d 1369, 1373 (Ind. Ct.App.1992) In that case, Ellyson was charged with burglary because he broke into the house where him and his estranged wife lived with the intent to rape her. He was still charged with burglary even though he had the right to possession of the house co-equal with his wife at the time of the breaking and entering.

Holding: Jewell was sentenced to an aggregate term of 48 years imprisonment. Jewell appealed but, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed.

Reasoning: The court decided on the conviction by saying that Fisher bought the house in her own

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 14, 1973, convicting him of assault in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to probation for five years.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Katz (the appellant) was convicted under an eight-count indictment, charged with transmitting wagering information by telephone from Los Angeles to Miami and Boston. The evidence, telephone conversations overheard by the FBI agents with an attached electronic listening and recording device, to the phone booth Katz used. The Court of Appeals rejected the contention that the recordings had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Kyle John Kelbel was convicted of first-degree murder, past pattern of child abuse, in violation of Minnesota state statute section 609.185(5) and second-degree murder, in violation of Minnesota statute 609.19, subdivision 2(1). He was sentenced to life in prison for the death of Kailyn Marie Montgomery. Kelbel appealed, and argued that the district court failed to instruct the jury that it must find that the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the acts that constituted the past pattern of child abuse and he also argued that the evidence against him was insufficient to prove past pattern of child abuse against Kailyn. Kelbel testified that the head injury of Kailyn was inflicted by a cup thrown at her head by step brother Evan. Kelbel also testified that other injuries found on Kailyn were caused by Evan and that he is "rough" with her. Medical examiners ran an autopsy on Kailyn's body and determined that the injuries had been caused by blunt trauma and force caused by a knee or fist. Medical examiners testified that the injuries caused could not have been caused by a cup thrown at her head or by an accidental fall down the stairs. Kailyn's mother, Lindsey, also testified that Kailyn had previous injuries that she became concerned with. Upon retrieving a search warrant, police entered Lindsey's home to find further evidence. Police found a dent in the wall near Kailyn's bed. After Kelbel was eventually found guilty of the charges brought, Kelbel filed a motion for a judgement of aquittal and for a new trial on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. The district court denied the motion.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Police officers were in pursuit of a suspected drug dealer, and were led to an apartment complex. The officers ended up outside of a certain apartment, were the smell of marijuana emanated. The police knocked loudly, and from inside the apartment they heard movement, and the police believed that the sounds were an indication that evidence was being destroyed. The police announced their intent to enter the apartment, kicked the door down to find drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain sight, and arrested King and others. They continued to search the apartment and came across other evidence. King argued that due to the officers not having a warrant…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Smith v. United States, the plaintiff, John Angus Smith, was convicted of engaging in drug-trafficking, which would have granted him a five year sentence had he not “used” a firearm in regards to the incident. As stated in statute 924(c)(1), the use of firearm in relations to a drug-trafficking crime enhanced the sentence, and turned it into a 30-year sentence. The argument at hand is whether the term “use” was to be taken from a broad dictionary definition or in the ordinary meaning. The majority of the court argued that the term “use” should not be limited to the intended use of the firearm (as a weapon) as they exemplified cases of which the firearm was used as a bludgeon even though that was not it’s intended purpose, yet…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ben will appear in Lynchburg General District Court Monday, October 10,2011, to face charges of: one count first degree murder; one count attempted murder; and one count malicious wounding. His official trial date will be set at that time.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the many things learned at state police academies around the country is the “Terry pat”. What a Terry pat is, is a basic pat down of a suspects outer clothing, searching for weapons. The name came be known by a Superior Court case in the 1960’s, known as Terry v. Ohio.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    State v Stark

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Upon conclusion of jury trial Stark was overly sentenced for one count of second-degree assault of 120 months or 10 years.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Robinette was pulled over for speeding and given a warning, technically he was free to leave. But he was asked if his car could be searched and he consented. Robinette claims he would not have consent if he knew he could have declined. So he feels that the officer should have stated something along the lines of “you are free to go” before asking to search the car. Robinette feels this is a violation of his right within the Fourth Amendment. It is then discovered that the Fourth Amendment does not require the suspect to be advised he is free to go before consent is considered voluntary.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robert E. Lee Ringler, 21, of 640 S. Monroe St., pleaded not guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to assault, resisting arrest and criminal damaging. The assault charge, because it involved a police officer acting in his official capacity, is a fourth-degree felony, punishable by up to 18 months in prison.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question here is whether or not the petitioner, Jose Padilla, will be deported on account that he had plead guilty to a crime but allegedly had his sixth amendment right violated. There are multiply issues here. The first issue here is Padilla plead guilty to a drug offense that took place in the United States. The second issue is he claims his counsel did not inform him about the consequences of his plea bargain and he was misinformed about the possibility of deportation. The third is he states his decision would have been different if his counsel would have been verbally clear about the risk of his plea bargain. The short answer to the question is yes. Yes, Padilla will be deported back to his home country of Honduras.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 1970's two court cases were being held in the supreme court about cruel and unusual punishment. Ingraham Vs. Wright (1977) and Gregg Vs. Georgia (1976). I choose to compare these because they both favored common good instead of individual rights and had a lot of similar aspects of their trials. During these Supreme Court cases Gregg Vs. Georgia showed more balance between the promoting the common good and protecting the individual rights than Ingraham Vs. Wright showed in 1977.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    R V Campbell

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Janet’s first husband died in 1997, leaving her with two properties and Janet was rumoured to be a wealthy woman. She was no athletic and did not participate in any regular exercise; she had also never been camping and had a strong fear of heights. The offender was posted to Deniliquin where he met Janet through work. Campbell also had relationships with other women where he gained money. Janet and the offenders relationship was kept a secret from the family until mid-march 2004, much after their sexual relationship had begun in the middle of 2003, three years after they had met. The family had discouraged Janet from marrying the offender and the wedding was cancelled for the 13th April 2004.…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judge decided the precedent established in previous cases did not apply to this case because the Judge thought the husband was malicious. He may not have stuck or stabbed the wife, but he did say he will kill her if she ever came back and a witness could testify to that. Since malice was involved they overruled the precedent of the State v.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secure Communities

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    aggravated felony (level 1) offenses like murder, rape and the sexual abuse of children were…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays