Preview

John Brown Terrorist

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
740 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Brown Terrorist
John Brown was a freedom fighter. For multiple reasons, and research on John Brown and the incidents in which he was involved in have led me to believe he is a freedom fighter. Although John Brown’s actions have not been justified. He did them with a purpose in which he did not inspire the threat of fear. Between a terrorist and a freedom fighter they are different, yet have similarities. To make it clear what each is, a terrorist is someone who puts harm and fear towards people on purpose, and an example of a terrorist is the infamous September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center. That is not the only way to define terrorism or terrorist, there are multiple ways to explain. This is just one of many ways of explaining it. A freedom …show more content…
My evidence for this is that he stated, in his own words that he felt no regret, nor remorse for the acts he had conducted. He was hung knowing he had at least some effect on slavery. Not only did he not have regret for his actions but he felt no regret for putting his family, friends, and followers in danger. At the Harper’s Ferry raid but not by John Brown. Although he didn’t feel any regret he made his point and the free states tried to end slavery, even if the free states had slave hunters come and take black people even if they were free. The Harper’s Ferry raid, John Brown had lost his sons by the next morning, and a few others. He was hung a while later after he was taken by a slave state where he had committed a murder of a slave owner. John Brown’s religion was that if you were rich and wealthy, you were to go to Heaven, but if you were poor, you were to go to Hell. He was a poor man, he was always in debut to someone. He was a Calvinist. Which led to him being selfless, but also selfish. The reasoning behind him being selfish is due to him wanting to be able to redeem himself in Heaven. Also, the reasoning behind him being selfless is due to him risking everything for the life of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hero or criminal? John Brown was a radical abolitionist who was born on May 9, 1800, in Torrington, Connecticut. He was one of the so-called worst and the greatest abolitionists of his time. Brown believed that violence was the one and only way to bring an end to slavery. He provoked the slaves to revolt against their owners by giving them guns and support. Also in 1859, Brown and his 21 men army seized the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in the hope of gaining guns and supplies for the slaves. The attack was not a success because he was captured and both of his sons got killed during the fight. After a speedy trial, he was convicted to death, which in this case was not even such a huge surprise according to all the blood that he shed in the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did John Brown's Raid

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Between the years 1859 and 1863 John Brown’s rain on the Federal Armory at Harpers Ferry made him a hero in the North and a villain in the South. Brown’s raid was over in about 2 days. He wanted to start an armed slave revolt by seizing the Federal Armory. John Brown was hung for treason because of his actions. Brown’s plan was not to conduct a sudden raid and then escape to the mountains. Rather, his plan was to use those rifles and pikes he captured at the arsenal, in addition to those he brought along, to arm rebellious slaves with the aim of striking terror to the slaveholders in Virginia.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John brown has been looked upon by many as a hero, but was he really a hero? Let’s look at the thing’s he’s done for abolition and think to ourselves as we read, “is this really what a ‘hero’ would do?” I’ll go into more detail later through out this of course, but for now, let’s review the gist of what he has “done for abolition.” From the third document, it states that he led only 21 men into the military arsenal in Harpers Ferry, Virginia. That was basically suicide for them. Yes, it was very brave of him, but he should have realized 21 men wouldn’t be enough for how many men that military had. He planned to give the weapons from the arsenal to slaves and start a chain reaction of revolts throughout the Southeast. All I have to ask is really? Did he really think that it would be that easy to take from the arsenal? Not only that, but in document two it also states that in 1856, Brown and six of his followers got revenge for the violence in Lawrence by killing five settlers in the pro-slavery camps along the Pottawatomie Creek. He also fled to Kansas, like a coward, to escape prosecution. This should be enough information for you, but let’s go into further detail.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was more of villain rather than a hero. John Brown did many, many bad things to America. John Brown had a lot of lawsuits against him, about 40 of them. Also, John had a raid on the Harper’s Ferry killing so much people. That wasn’t enough for him Brown went to cabin to cabin killing people at town, Pottawatomie Creek, killing at least 5 people. In fact, Senator Andrew Jackson, even stated, “This old man Brown …was a more than a murderer, a robber, a thief, and a traitor.” Therefor, John Brown is an villain.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John brown was about…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was an American born abolitionist who actively fought Slavery through the use of violence. His ultimate goal was to overthrow the entire system of Slavery in the south, and he went about doing so through armed attacks, including his infamous raid on Harpers Ferry in 1859. John Brown’s armed attack on Harper’s Ferry caused a major dispute between the nation’s separate slavery movements, and had substantial effects in the social and political ideologies of the American people. His antics ultimately played a key role in the swaying of opinions towards slavery leading into the upcoming presidential election of 1860, and as a result, should be considered America’s first true hero. Despite his poorly thought out, and short lasting raid…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood (John Brown)”. John Brown used violence and killed many people. Not only that, but the death of two of his sons was not enough to stop him from moving on. Brown was so determined that he believed it was God’s wish that he abolishes slavery. He thought he was made for this job only. John Brown reckoned violence is the solution to achieve his goal and be successful. He led a raid on Harper’s Ferry with several men. The motive behind this was to start up a slave insurrection. But the first man killed during the raid was a black.Though Brown’s intentions were noble, the way he acted upon them were not. Therefore, John Brown is guilty of trespassing, treason, and murder.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abraham Lincoln called John Brown a misguided fanatic! John Brown was not a misguided fanatic. John Brown tried his best to save the slaves from all the hard work and bring them to freedom, he just wanted slavery to end. Brown took a vow to end slavery when he found out that an abolitionist newspaperman was killed. He didn’t want anyone to harm the slaves, so he had a plan to save the slaves, he had a meeting with Frederick Douglass about the plan to save the slaves, so things wouldn't get out of hand, but Douglass opposed to his plan, Brown’s plan was to take over Harper’s Ferry, because Douglass knew that his plan would have failed and have also led to many black deaths, he thought that Brown would’ve hurt the abolition movement by causing…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Brown’s raid on Harper's Ferry he was perceived by the South as a villain and the North as martyr. Even more controversy arose between the two sides of the country because of Brown’s radicalistic approach to end slavery. Many have claimed that although he failed to attack Harper’s Ferry, he had a spark in him and had righteous cause. In the South, Brown was viewed as a dangerous criminal, and his actions increased the fear of a slave uprising.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second reason is his attack on Kansas. The third reason is he dragged his sons into the attack. The first reason John Brown was a terrorist was the attack on Harper’s Ferry. He thought if he attacked it would make him stronger to take over Harper’s Ferry, to start a slave revolt, then to destroy the institution of slavery.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Brown Beliefs

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Brown’s beliefs about slavery and activities to destroy it hardly represented the mainstream views of northern society in the years leading up to the Civil War. This rather unique man, however, has become central to an understanding and in some cases misunderstandings about the origins of the Civil War. Brown felt strongly about slavery being an abomination due to his religious upbringings. As a result, he advocated for the use of violence to eradicate the system. Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry further fueled the Southern belief regarding majority of Northerners being radical abolitionists.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Brown was an abolitionist during the lead up to the Civil War. He believed that God chose him to end slavery and kill southerners with only violence in his toolbelt. Brown had controversy over his actions. The nation was already tenuous and the murders that John Brown committed only added to that. The north was all for it, Brown was doing what they hadn’t had the courage to do. The southerners were outraged, claiming Brown for a traitor.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brown was completely insane I mean this guys a nut job. He had multiple family members inside insane asylum including three aunts, two uncles, his only sister, her daughter, and six first cousins., Now this is ultimately the case with John brown here as you can see not a shining image of mental health. John Brown also thought he was following Gods will when he raided and killed and pillaged. When it came time to go to court for John Brown he and his defense attorneys had decided that the only way to save him is that he needed to plead medically insane which I belive he is.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John and his three other siblings grew up in an incredibly religious home. Both of his parents were deep believers that America was God’s way to let Christ return to Earth, and slavery was the only thing preventing this. Growing up learning all of their beliefs, this eventually led him to believe that all of the crimes he was committing were okay, since this was God’s mission for him and his family. Brown’s mission began when he was just 12 years old, and witnessed a slave killed by his owner. It was this moment where he swore to himself that he would fight against slavery.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a terrorist or freedom fighter truly depends on which side you are. For example the Austro-Hungarians most likely thought Gavrilo Princip was a terrorist because he disturbed their rein of power, however to the Serbians, Gavrilo was most likely seen as a freedom fighter. Furthermore the best way to decide is to be an un-biased third party. First off looking at the definitions and looking at widely regarded terrorist attack such as 911, we look at why Gavrilo attacked. In 911 terrorists attack another countries citizen in their own country, the key part is that it was in another person’s country. Looking at Gavrilo he attacked the political party that over took his country. He simply wanted his own country back, he was filled with sovereignty. Furthermore it’s who (person) he attacked and the power of that person. As we already know Franz Ferdinand was the next to rule the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Gavrilo and the rest of the Black Hand did not attack any citizens or powerful people to make a point. They attacked to stop the tyranny over their country; they shed the least amount of blood. It wasn’t to tell of the Austro-Hungarians, and say they can kill everyone. It was to say this is our country, we demand sovereignty. They wanted to stop their rule right then and there. To further understand why this was done, we look at for whom it was for, and why Gavrilo joined the Black Hand. Gavrilo was dying of tuberculoses, he wasn’t doing it solely for himself, he looked at how oppressed his people were and wanted to do something meaningful with the remander of his life. In the video we watched it said Gavrilo wanted to be remembered. He knew he was dying but he failed to act the first time because he was scared, he still could have shot even with the commotion that happened earlier. However he did fail to act, now this doesn’t sound like a terrorist or villain. Yes further on he shot Franz because he knew this was what needed to be done. Finally Gavrilo attacked…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays