Preview

John Calhoun's Anti-Slavery Sentiments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
616 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Calhoun's Anti-Slavery Sentiments
In Calhoun’s response to anti-slavery sentiments expressed to the senate, Calhoun makes the argument that abolition is something that must be swiftly dealt with in order to preserve the union. Calhoun constructs a carefully worded argument which, while morally wrong today, is extremely persuasive. He arranges his argument so that the issue of slavery is not seen as a nefarious institution but rather a keystone on which every great civilization, including America, was built. Over the course of his argument he manages to make it seem as though the dangers to the union were not the institution of slavery itself but the growing demand for abolition. Through careful wording and construction Calhoun is successful at creating an effective argument …show more content…
He makes the point that “never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other.”(Calhoun) Calhoun then makes the argument that slavery is not something the south should apologize for and even goes so far as asserting that slavery is actually not an evil but “a positive good” for not only slave holders, but blacks and the rest of country as well(Calhoun). To support this assertion Calhoun says that before slavery Africans had never reached a level of civilization in which they had benefited as much morally and intellectually as they had under the institution of slavery in the United States. He brings up the conditions that slaves in European countries are exposed to and says that by comparison slaves in the United States benefit far more. “I may say with truth, that in few countries so much is left to the share of the laborer, and so little exacted from him.”(Calhoun) With these points Calhoun is trying to appeal to the morality of his audience by getting rid of any sort of guilt that his contemporaries might have had in regards to the effects of slavery after discussing the abolitionist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He writes, “The abolition of the slave trade was supposed to be the certain death of slavery. Cut off the stream, and the pond will dry up, was the common notion at this time” (345). However, the South was set in their beliefs and they refused to change. Since the problem stemmed from…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    blood money quests 1

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When slavery was abolished, the most countries (as a whole) did not benefit as much…unlike the slave owners who were given most of the money. He thinks that if any assitance is going to be give, it should be carefully thought about and based on TODAY’S needs not the things we feel was wrong in the PAST.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Why does Lincoln in the “House Divided” speech believe the pro-slavery side was winning regarding the expansion of slavery in the territories? Why does Calhoun in opposing the Compromise of 1850 think the South was at a disadvantage? Because starting the new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the National territory by Congressional prohibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the National territory to slavery, and was the first point gained…… Although each side received benefits, the north seemed to gain the most. The North had absolute control over the government. The South…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We will be concerned with whether Abraham Lincoln succeeded in remaining indifferent and nonpartisan towards the South in his 2nd Inaugural Address. In what is considered one of the most distinguished Presidential commencement speeches on record, as well as the shortest in length at approximately 700 words, the "Great Emancipator" understood the Herculean task ahead of him in unifying the bisected country. By illustrating how slavery was the predominant cause of hostility that halved a nation, Lincoln expresses his eagerness for tranquility while heavily referencing the role of God in the Union's endeavor to create a more perfect republic. In seeking to ensure that the Confederate States would be welcomed back to the Union amiably, I will argue that Lincoln prevailed by remaining both moderate and neutral, and in so doing, revived a nation desperate to push forward.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This guy is voicing the classic Southern position on the relationship between the States and the Union (which he, of course, envisions as a Confederation where states have the greater authority). The fact that slavery has been allowed to exist (as a state decision) seems to further validate his view, as does the enactment of Fugitive Slave Laws by the Federal Government with the recognition of the “right” of people to practice slavery and to have their “property” protected.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, in his second inauguration speech, surprises his audience by not giving a long, protracted harangue on politics and states’ rights, instead, he gives a concise lecture on the evilness of slavery and not charging the south with the entire cause of the war. And through juxtaposition, biblical allusion, and classical appeals, Lincoln articulates his purposes: to urge public amnesty for the south and to reunite the Unites States under one flag.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He warned that “Mexico is to us the forbidden fruit...the penalty of eating it would be to subject our institutions to political death.” As an avid supporter of slavery and defender of the South, Calhoun argued that the admission of California as a free state and the enforcement of the Wilmot Proviso would result in the increase of the sectional conflict. In his beliefs, slavery was “a positive good,” that would develop a civic-mindedness in the poor whites and make the American Dream attainable. In his speech toward the Compromise of 1850, although he respected the ideas presented by Clay and Webster, he felt that it did not protect the south’s rights. As an effective debater, he proposed that “The North must do justice … and do her duty… relative to fugitive slaves… cease the agitation of the slavery question… and provide for… and amendment which will restore the South… the power she possessed of protecting herself.”…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.” Lincoln is mentoring others views about slavery but says that he is willing to reunite the Union even if slaves are freed or not. Linonlcs main property is the war at hand, then he promises to do something about slavery.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Section I: Calhoun’s Oregon Bill Speech: A Denunciation of Natural Law in Defense of Slavery…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “There was really no such thing as foreigner; there were only free men and slaves.” (27) This gives the reader an idea on the views of slavery during the Civil War. Chamberlain was one of the few that believed slavery was wrong, as mentioned before he believed they all humans were equal. He did believe that if it wasn’t for slavery the war would’ve never began “If it weren't for the slaves, there'd never have been no war, now would there?" "No," Chamberlain said.” Comments we constantly made for and against slavery, from the belief of some that black should be equal, and many harsh comments on their view on slavery. General Robert E. Lee himself believed slaves to be inferior “He does not own slaves nor believe in slavery, but he does not believe that the Negro "in the present stage of his development," can be considered the equal of the white man.” (xvi) General Longstreet who was also part of the Confederate Army believed the war was over slavery “Longstreet said nothing. The war was about slavery, all right. That was not why Longstreet fought but that was what the war was about, and there was no point in talking about it, never had…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.” Whether it was the last resource to keep the Union together or he truthfully supported the amendment, the notion that slavery was the deciding factor that triggered the Civil War does not give justice to other significant events that transpired to reach such…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When President Lincoln first took office, his view on slavery is that he can’t and has no position getting rid of it in the states where it already exists. In his first Inaugural Address, he explains, “ I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it already exists.” This greatly expresses his view in that, slavery is not his to deal with at all. Another example of this, also stated in Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address, “. . . the right of each state to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgement exclusively, is essential to that balance…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, in document A, Senator John C. Calhoun states, “I have, Senators, believed from the first that the agitation of the subject of slavery would, if not prevented by some timely and effective measure, end in disunion.” Senator John C. Calhoun also states, “The agitation has been permitted to proceed, with almost no attempt to resist it, until it has reached a period when it…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was the foundation of the antebellum South. More than any other characteristic, it defined Southern political, cultural, and social life. It also united the South as a section different from the rest of the country. John Caldwell Calhoun of South Carolina was committed to both state’s rights and slavery as seen as the South’s only protection from destruction by the industrious North. John C. Calhoun, the South 's recognized intellectual and political leader from the 1820s until his death in 1850, devoted much of his remarkable intellectual energy to defending his two-part political philosophy. One side of his theory was devoted to the rights of the minority sections, more importantly the South needed particular defense in the federal union. The second part was an incongruity that offered slavery as an institution that promoted everyone involved.…

    • 5816 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, at the same time he claims the North was not as open and free after the civil war as popular belief would have you believe. Because of the continued expansion of capitalism, there was an oppressed group that would serve as a support for the growing bank accounts of the rich, by providing the necessary labor who work for small wages. In a sense, the North and South found ways to subvert the emancipation of slavery by instituting a new form of economic and political oppression in which the…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays