These particular monks believe that they become more spiritually enlightened by consuming those who have passed away. There used to be hundreds of these monks but in today’s times the number has dwindled down to about 20 or so. “The ritual includes drinking from bowls made of human skulls, with their own bodies covered in the burnt remains of the dead. They only eat bodies that are already dead, though; they never kill the humans that they eat.” So, in the view of Mills there would be no question about if what they are doing is acceptable or not. There is all pleasure and no pain. The people they are eating are already dead so they are not harming them at all or causing any pain and in the minds of the monks it truly benefits them so from a utilitarian’s perspective the answer is obvious. However, there was a tribe in the Democratic Republic of Congo in which the soldiers there were eating people alive. “the Ituri province’s Congolese rebels were eating the Mbuti people…alive.” This particular case would be a little bit harder to decide on because it is very vague. If the rebels were eating these people as a way for survival then a utilitarianist may say that it is ok. However, if they were just eating them solely out of hatred then it would not be morally acceptable. “The object of this essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings
These particular monks believe that they become more spiritually enlightened by consuming those who have passed away. There used to be hundreds of these monks but in today’s times the number has dwindled down to about 20 or so. “The ritual includes drinking from bowls made of human skulls, with their own bodies covered in the burnt remains of the dead. They only eat bodies that are already dead, though; they never kill the humans that they eat.” So, in the view of Mills there would be no question about if what they are doing is acceptable or not. There is all pleasure and no pain. The people they are eating are already dead so they are not harming them at all or causing any pain and in the minds of the monks it truly benefits them so from a utilitarian’s perspective the answer is obvious. However, there was a tribe in the Democratic Republic of Congo in which the soldiers there were eating people alive. “the Ituri province’s Congolese rebels were eating the Mbuti people…alive.” This particular case would be a little bit harder to decide on because it is very vague. If the rebels were eating these people as a way for survival then a utilitarianist may say that it is ok. However, if they were just eating them solely out of hatred then it would not be morally acceptable. “The object of this essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings