John Wain - Sir
Sir,
I read with interest your story yesterday about the young internet criminal. My view of the case is that what the boy did was a really dumb idea. And I think that the people don’t have to have pity with the boy, because with 15 years can you estimate the consequence and you have to realize it. In the end begs the question, who has to pay. The Argentinian I think doesn’t have to pay. And the boy is a juvenile. In the end the company had to pay, but I don’t think that’s right. My opinion is that the parents are responsible for their child.
If I was the Argentinian, I would be a little bit angry, but I wouldn’t make a big drama, just say to the parents, they have to look better for their child.
One mistake I can see in the company. It can’t be, that you may give any credit card number at all. So my conclusion is, that all of them have to take the blame excepting the Argentinian guy and I think you will find that the majority of sensible people feel the same way.Eric is the son of newly divorced parents. He is the first and only child in the family. He is nearly 6 years of age and has difficulties adapting to the new the circumstances. He is in a period in his life where he is on the verge of becoming a ”big boy”. The childish manners are coming loose and the complicated grown-up world is taking over. He is very proud that the grown-ups also see him as a responsible young man. Still, he has problems understanding the adults. There are many questions he would like to ask them but is afraid to do so. How are the adults going to respond? Is it a grown-up questions? In order to protect his newly established valuations as a mature boy, he ignores asking. One of the questions he is struggling with is why his father is no longer with them. His mother told him that a new man was going to stay with them. Everything would be as before, except that Dad would not be there. Eric does not understand why his father had to leave just because Donald moved in. He loves his
I read with interest your story yesterday about the young internet criminal. My view of the case is that what the boy did was a really dumb idea. And I think that the people don’t have to have pity with the boy, because with 15 years can you estimate the consequence and you have to realize it. In the end begs the question, who has to pay. The Argentinian I think doesn’t have to pay. And the boy is a juvenile. In the end the company had to pay, but I don’t think that’s right. My opinion is that the parents are responsible for their child.
If I was the Argentinian, I would be a little bit angry, but I wouldn’t make a big drama, just say to the parents, they have to look better for their child.
One mistake I can see in the company. It can’t be, that you may give any credit card number at all. So my conclusion is, that all of them have to take the blame excepting the Argentinian guy and I think you will find that the majority of sensible people feel the same way.Eric is the son of newly divorced parents. He is the first and only child in the family. He is nearly 6 years of age and has difficulties adapting to the new the circumstances. He is in a period in his life where he is on the verge of becoming a ”big boy”. The childish manners are coming loose and the complicated grown-up world is taking over. He is very proud that the grown-ups also see him as a responsible young man. Still, he has problems understanding the adults. There are many questions he would like to ask them but is afraid to do so. How are the adults going to respond? Is it a grown-up questions? In order to protect his newly established valuations as a mature boy, he ignores asking. One of the questions he is struggling with is why his father is no longer with them. His mother told him that a new man was going to stay with them. Everything would be as before, except that Dad would not be there. Eric does not understand why his father had to leave just because Donald moved in. He loves his