Because of their knowledge in the particular area , and due to the fact that they study, research, and have delt with juveniles over a period of time. Is a reason why most scientist and reasearchers agree that the age limit should be risen and juveniles shouldn’t be charged as adults. Because recent research has shown that “ young peoples brains are more prone to peer preasure than adults ”. It entails that the brain of an adolecent is undevoloped , and supports the logical reasoning that you shouldn’t treat children as you would adults because they are completely different . As they say it is easier to teach a child than to fix an adult. Due to the overwhelming peer preasure faced by kids across the country it conveys the reasons for juvenile criminal conduct such as property crimes as shown in the pie chart …show more content…
A vote on the topic conveyed that more people liked the idea that children should be tried as adults and that the age should stay the same. “kids are kids and adults are adults. The age difference should not be different for the people committing a crime” a debater explained. It can be supported by a logical statement if a kid is old enough to conjure up ideas and act upon them viousously they should prepare for the consequences and the effects that the future holds in store. J Perkins writes that “further violent actions require uniform punishment regardless of age”. A perspective such as J Perkins stems from an traditional society perspective as stated above there are consequences for one’s actions . No matter age, color, religon the same rule applies to anyone and everyone under the law. Statstics have shown that, “the number of juveniles arrested for such violent crimes increased by 50 percent”. Supporting that the ideology of juvenile delinquents are the same as the ideology of adults. Because they know it is morally wrong but choose not to accept the rule of