Preview

Explain Why Juveniles Should Be Charged As Adults

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Juveniles Should Be Charged As Adults
For various adolescents today, there are traditional views that society has implemented and imposed morally. Such as consequences for one’s actions, majority rules, and utilitarianism. Due to the multiple perspectives of society, the outcome of opinions on the topic of changing the age limit for juveniles being charged as adults are made vary. A juvenile delinquent is charaterized as someone who commits criminal conduct under the age of 18 years old. Even though the age limit for juveniles should stay where it is some might think otherwise. Such as medical analyist , scientist , and law makers who have conducted experiments , surveys , and statistics. Due to the change in crimes and increase in juvenile criminal conduct over the years …show more content…
Because of their knowledge in the particular area , and due to the fact that they study, research, and have delt with juveniles over a period of time. Is a reason why most scientist and reasearchers agree that the age limit should be risen and juveniles shouldn’t be charged as adults. Because recent research has shown that “ young peoples brains are more prone to peer preasure than adults ”. It entails that the brain of an adolecent is undevoloped , and supports the logical reasoning that you shouldn’t treat children as you would adults because they are completely different . As they say it is easier to teach a child than to fix an adult. Due to the overwhelming peer preasure faced by kids across the country it conveys the reasons for juvenile criminal conduct such as property crimes as shown in the pie chart …show more content…
A vote on the topic conveyed that more people liked the idea that children should be tried as adults and that the age should stay the same. “kids are kids and adults are adults. The age difference should not be different for the people committing a crime” a debater explained. It can be supported by a logical statement if a kid is old enough to conjure up ideas and act upon them viousously they should prepare for the consequences and the effects that the future holds in store. J Perkins writes that “further violent actions require uniform punishment regardless of age”. A perspective such as J Perkins stems from an traditional society perspective as stated above there are consequences for one’s actions . No matter age, color, religon the same rule applies to anyone and everyone under the law. Statstics have shown that, “the number of juveniles arrested for such violent crimes increased by 50 percent”. Supporting that the ideology of juvenile delinquents are the same as the ideology of adults. Because they know it is morally wrong but choose not to accept the rule of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority advances their argument by listing some of the mental differences between adults and juveniles such as: “susceptibility to immature behavior”, lack of control over their environment and the peers that come with it, the ability to undergo a character change. These factors were enough for the Court to find the age group a suspect class and hold that they have diminished culpability, at least to an extent that the death penalty becomes an excessive…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Juveniles under the age of 18 will display lower levels of psychosocial maturity than participants aged 18 or 25” (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 60). Steinberg found in an experiment that by the age of 21 participants appeared to be more stabilized in their judgment, indicating that young people may not reach levels of adult maturity until 21, and are developing skills in this domain mostly in the ages from 16 to 19 (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 59). This is to say that before 21 the brain is not stabilized in judgment, therefore when a young person commits a crime their not capable of judging the consequences of their actions like an adult. Research shows that although juveniles understand that their behaviors are considered wrong, due…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial system was created to protect and hold stability in society which is why two systems were put in place, the juvenile system and the adult system. However, recently the boundaries for these two systems are growing weaker as serious juvenile offenders are getting tried in adult court. Juveniles are not authorized to drink alcohol, sign a document, gamble at a casino or vote till they are an adult. Regardless to the crime they have committed, a juvenile is a juvenile and an adult is an adult, therefore sixteen year olds should not be tried in adult court. Sixteen year olds being tried in adult court is wrong because they are able to effectively reform, their brains are not sufficiently developed and they are vulnerable to adult prisons.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jazmyne Garcia Shywanda Royal English 12b 04/6/16 Juveniles deserve life sentencing It is more likely for teenagers to commit heinous crimes when they have been emotionally and physically abused. Teenagers who suffer from a mental illness are more likely to commit recidivism than an adult that has random encounters with the law. Prosecutors who try juveniles as adults believe that a crime is a crime, even if the person who committed it was a young adult.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on the article, ”Kids Are Kids…” the author, Marjie Lundstrom states that children as young as twelve and thirteen are being charged as adults in America’s courts. For example, “On March 9, Lionel Tate-who was twelve when he savagely beat to death a six-year-old girl-will likely learn if he must spend life in prison after his lawyer unsuccessfully tried to put pro wrestling on trial.” This is showing how a juvenile is committing a crime so immense that might put him behind the bars.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles makes bad decision but it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re all bad, majority of them steal or choose a bad path. Everybody makes mistakes but doesn’t mean they all should get a punishment that makes them suffer for the rest of their life. Researches say “among them the discovery of striking changes taking place during the teen years. These findings have…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A worldwide situation in criminal justice is the youth, who are being tried as adults for their wrongdoings. Although juveniles commit heinous crimes such as robbery, murder, or even rape, they are not mature enough to understand what they are doing. In the article “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” a 12-year-old boy got sentenced life in prison after he beat a 6- year-old girl to her death (Lundstrom). The boy did not know the girl was going to die because he is not mature enough to know what his actions will do. These consequences should not apply to the youth because their minds are not fully developed like the adults. Because kids like to play around with each other “Now fourteen and convicted as an adult of first-degree murder, Tate…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My whole life I have heard it said that kids will be forever be kids and don’t know the right between right and wrong. In recent discussion of On Punishment and Teen Killers controversial issue has been whether juveniles should stay in juvenile hall or go to adult prison. Advocates argue that juvenile should stay in juvenile hall not adult prison “juvenile advocates ‘ reliance on the underdevelopment…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel the law should be abolished is that the juvenile can be charged as an adult in the legal court system. The traditional rule is that anyone who is under 18 is a juvenile and will be tried in the juvenile court system. However, in certain circumstances, almost every state now allows for youths below the age of 18 to be tried as an adults. Some states give juvenile court judges to power to have juvenile’s case tried in adult criminal court. Some states give power to prosecutors the power to decide whether or not a juvenile will be tried as an adult. In some states,…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The only effective way to reduce and prevent juvenile crime is to balance tough enforcement measures with targeted, effective and intervention initiatives.” Juveniles are children and children don’t know any better and obviously make mistakes. They don’t expect to be caught after committing a serious crime. Juveniles brains are not fully developed until they are 25, but young people recognize them as adults at the age of 18. About 25,000 children a year have their cases sent to adult courts instead of being tried in juvenile courts, whose convicted defendants are usually set free by the time they turn 21. Trying juveniles as adults is not beneficial for them. But it also is a crime. And crimes are crimes whether…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A movement has taken hold of our country to change the juvenile justice system, and erase any distinction between young offenders and adult criminals. Almost all fifty states have changed their juvenile justice laws, allowing more youths to be tried as adults and scrapping long-time efforts to help rehabilitate delinquent kids and prevent future crimes. It seems to be plain and simple, a minor in this country is defined as a person under the age of eighteen. How then can we single out certain minors and call them adults? Were they considered adults before they carried out an act of violence? No. How then, did a violent act cause them to cross over a line that is defined by age? The current debate over juvenile crime is being dominated by two voices: elected officials proposing quick-fix solutions, and a media more intent on reporting violent crimes than successful prevention efforts. Minors should not be tried as adults in our society today. This is obvious through looking at propositions by our government such as Proposition 21, which is statistics on juvenile crime from specific cases where minors were sentenced in adult courts.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried the same way as adults are for the crimes they commit to a certain degree. For many kids being a juvenile delinquent isn’t even entirely their fault. Juveniles also just aren’t at the right mindset to be going to prisons at young ages. There are other courses of action that can be taken to help the troubled child out other then locking them up like adults.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays