Preview

Jonathan Swift's Violence Vanquished

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1207 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jonathan Swift's Violence Vanquished
A History of Violence
When governments ignore their citizens the violence of a realm will increase. This reality is displayed in “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift, “Violence Vanquished” by Steven Pinker, “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell and other historical facts. When a government ensures that the basic needs of their people are met, poverty decreases and crime and violence decrease. When the government doesn’t do this the opposite happens. By ignoring citizens they will be left with meeting their own basic needs. In theory people can do this, but not when others hold them back. Once a government stops protecting its people and starts exploiting them it becomes difficult to avoid poverty. This apathy on the government’s part causes
…show more content…
During the Colonial Period, England was driven by a desire to conquer more than their European foes such as Spain and France, and they couldn’t care less that their colonies were treated poorly. The British, for example, exploited America. They taxed common items such as tea, newspapers and playing cards and its soldiers invaded the homesteads of regular citizens whenever they needed the free housing. To add insult to injury, the Americans did not have a say in their own governing as Parliament made all the authoritative laws for them and no representatives were allowed who weren’t British.Unfortunately for King George III, some of his subjects would rather die than suffer such abuse, even when it was done under the pretext of keeping the colonies safe. The unbearable treatment would lead to the most violent conflict imaginable, war. The Americans’ intent was not to wage war. They pleaded to the British king in the Olive Branch Petition. They promised to remain a faithful colony to their mother country if only some representation in the Parliament could be granted. The British government, especially its king, didn’t give their pleas any notice and as a result thousands of violent deaths would ensue in the War for …show more content…
Burma was a relatively happy country for most of the nineteenth century. The Burmese fought the British Empire for years to maintain their independence but the superpower didn’t care that their future subjects desired to be free, and finally conquered them in the late 1800’s. England redrew the borders of Burma and made it part of India, even though Burma was a totally separate country with its own cultural and political identity. After years of oppression under a government that ignored their well-being, the Burmese of 1920 were sick of and dying under foreign rule. As a young officer in Moulmein, Burma, George Orwell was “an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. When a nimble Burman tripped [him on a football field] and the referee (another Burman) looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter.” (216). After enduring bullying at the hands of the Burmese, Orwell’s main purpose as an officer was to appear strong and wise in front of the Burmans. This resulted in Orwell violently murdering an elephant to maintain an air of superiority. In sum, because the British government didn’t care about the Burmese, tensions ran high which led to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the time of the French-Indian War the Americans seemed to have many complaints. The British Parliament placed many duties and restrictions on the 13 colonies during this War. While some may argue Britain's actions were justified, that is not the case. They unfairly taxed the colonies, used the money purely for their own profit, and robbed them of their rights.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    England’s government abused the rights of mankind. Specifically the king had too much power that he used to control the Colonials and denied the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to the colonists. King George Ⅲ wouldn’t allow representation in government for the Colonies, prevented the colonials to settle in new territory past the Appalachian mountains, established a military that had unnecessary power over the colonials, violated English law and tradition, wouldn’t allow America to trade with any other nation, hired German mercenaries, and tried to get natives and slaves to revolt against the colonies. Because King George Ⅲ violated the people’s inalienable rights, the colonials had the right to step away from Britain and develop their own…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This story begins in Moulmain, in lower Burma. The author speaks about his experiences while he was working as a police officer. In this time, Orwell was a young inexperienced soldier. He was in that place to protect the Queen’s interests. He had to do unethical things that made conflicts himself. When he mentions that he killed an elephant I feel his pangs of conscience. The elephant destroyed a village before it died. The villagers were furious about all the mess and Orwell was called to restore the order before anything, or anyone, was hurt. While this adventure runs, he decided to kill the animal because he thought that was the best. He needed to show solidarity among the villagers as a man of authority.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1760's, the majority of colonists in North America were happily British. Proud to be subjects of their king, they benefited from the imperial system with few costs. Until 1763 Britain, for the most part, left the colonies alone. The French and Indian War had come to an end, leaving the colonists eager to partake in all the opportunities of America. In the midst of this tranquility, the British imposed taxes on the colonies in an attempt to raise revenues. As Americans saw their liberties and power threatened, the relationship between Britain and America began to unravel. While several specific events marked the way to the Revolutionary War, the ideology of the colonists, deeply rooted in their convictions about rights and power, made the war inevitable.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He would be insulted and disrespected by the natives. Orwell noted, “I was hated by large numbers of people”(Orwell). This was simply because he was a European and was looked upon as the oppressor, when in actuality, Orwell was against everything he was doing and was entirely on the side of the Burmese. Orwell stated that “imperialism was an evil thing” and “I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British”(Orwell). This is a perfect example of what Ruskin was talking about when he said, “The only consequence is what we do”(Ruskin). Orwell had all of these different thoughts and ideas about how he was with the Burmese in their fight and was completely against the British, but he never acted upon any of them. This lack of action resulted in him having to stray from his personal values and slaughter an elephant, “solely to avoid looking a…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans were justified in waging war because King George III was ignoring and not listening to the colonists.” Some of them had been tarred, others had their property burnt and destroyed by the populace”(Doc. I). The King of British did not give any of the colonists a say in the government which caused the tarring and destroyed populaces. “There is another late act of Parliament...The Townshend Act.” (Doc. B). The colonists once again didn’t have a say in the government. The colonists didn’t even have a choice about the…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The old "taxation without representation" argument said it all. Colonists were tired of having things like taxes passed onto them in Parliament all the way out in England without any representation. It was as if they were being treated like second class citizens who had no say in their own rights within the colonies. But instead of listening to its citizens, England decided to clamp down even further on the colonies, sparking even more grievances. The war was the result of the political American Revolution. Colonists galvanized around the position that the Stamp Act of 1765, imposed by Parliament of Great Britain, was unconstitutional. The British Parliament insisted it had the right to tax colonists. The colonists claimed that, as they were…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British passed laws that concerned the whole empire, including the colonies. However, the entire empire was not represented in Parliament. "Great Britain also had the authority to bind every part and every subject without the least distinction, whether such subjects have a right to vote or not, whether the law binds places within the realm or without," as said by Lord Mansfield in 1766. The British legislation felt that the colonists "were subjects, and owed allegiance and subjection to their mother country and King George thought the colonists were traitors. George mentioned that the Britons were the best and most prestigious of all the people. Britain also really couldn't afford to fight another war because she had just been fighting wars with Spain and France that caused them major debt. Therefore that later lead them to taxing imports and exports from other colonies such as tea. Many Englishmen felt that the colonists were starting this uprising for attention. They said that the colonists were immature and self-concerned. However, the British Parliament was not the only one's that did not want a war. Loyalists, one of the two opposing groups felt that avoiding a war would be most advantageous. "Agriculture, commerce, and industry would resume their wonted vigor....our trade would still have the protection of the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" is an essay about a British police officer living in Lower Burma who goes through the trial and error process of making the right decisions while still trying to maintain an image and position of authority. The officer is hated by the Burmese people, which is clearly shown when he would play football. The Burmese were extremely unfair to the officer due to the fact he was part of the Imperialist group which was oppressing Burma. (para. 1) Although the officer is hated he feels "Imperialism, [is] an evil thing" and he "[is] all for the Burmese and against their oppressors, the British," his own kind. (para. 2)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The King was interfering with the colonists' right to self-government and a fair judicial system. Acting with Parliament, the King also instituted legislation that affected the colonies without their consent. This legislation levied taxes on the colonists. It also required them to quarter British soldiers, removed their right to trial by jury, and prevented them from trading freely. Additionally, the King and Parliament were guilty of outright destruction of American life and property by their refusal to protect the colonies' borders, their confiscation of American ships at sea, and their intent to hire foreign mercenaries to fight against the colonists. The colonial governments tried to reach a peaceful reconciliation of these differences with Great Britain, but were continually ignored. Colonists who appealed to British citizens were similarly ignored, despite their shared common heritage and their just cause. After many peaceful attempts, the colonists had no choice but to declare independence from Great Britain.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the end, colonists had many goals and reasons for waging war against Britain. The colonists wanted more power and say in government, protection of the equal and inalienable rights of the citizens, being treated fairly as a human should, equal rights for everyone, and limitations of a government’s power. With all these goals in mind and the efforts they put forth to ensure them, the colonists shaped history and created a new political practice called…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During a game of football, the Burmese continue to deliberately wear down and injure Orwell due to the fact that they know he will not step up and protect himself. Orwell fails to stand up for himself around the locals after being blatantly mistreated on several occasions because he fears embarrassment, resulting in him feeling humiliated. “When a nimble Burman tripped me up on the football field and the referee, a Burman, looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter.” Orwell is a minority, that is the bottom line and when you are the minority, you lack the courage to stand up for yourself due to the fear of humiliation. He feels powerless or out of his element, and in result is incapable of gathering enough true courage to stand up for himself. In another instance, Orwell’s courage is tested when he is faced with shooting the elephant in front of thousands of Burmans. When George Orwell is first informed of the elephant situation, his intentions are to observe the elephant’s behaviour and to ensure that it does not cause harm to the Burmese. Little does he know that he is about to be thrust into the spotlight, as nearly two thousand Burmans follow him to the scene. The audience hinders his ability to do the right thing, as his mindset changes to avoid humiliation. “The sole thought in my mind was that if anything went wrong those two thousand Burmans would see me pursued, caught, trampled on and reduced to a grinning corpse like that Indian up the hill. And if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh...That would never do.” George Orwell is under immense pressure during this time from the thousands of Burman eyes glaring at him. Orwell believes in the Burmans and wants more appreciation from them. Since the Burmans hate the British and Orwell is a British police officer, there is a great burden on Orwell to please the natives to…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell begins his essay by describing the intense hatred of the Burmese for their European masters. In Moulmein, in Lower Burma, I was hated by large numbers of people, the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me. Europeans were spit at, jeered at, and insulted. As a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Burmese Imperialism

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The British began colonizing India and its surrounding countries during the early 1800’s and soon had several profitable colonies in the Eastern Hemisphere. The arrival of the British imperialists in the country had a profound effect on the native population. This interaction between dominators and dominated is perfectly illustrated In George Orwell’s Burmese Days. This novel highlights the imperial interactions in the country of Burma just to the east of India, which in the mid 1920’s was part of India. The British imperialists believed that they were better than the Burmese in every way and the Burmese would be nothing if they weren’t subservient to the English…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racism Vs Colonialism

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Orwell states in the second paragraph of his essay that he “had already made up [his] mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner [he] chucked out [his] job the better” because the mistreatment of the people around him makes him feel “an intolerable sense of guilt.” However, he perpetuates colonialism by not quitting his job, viewing Indian and Burmese people as savage and inferior to him, and, ultimately, by shooting an elephant “solely to avoid looking like a fool” in front of a crowd of onlookers, even though he knows it isn’t what he “ought to do.” What scares Orwell more than what Kipling describes as “the threat of terror” that comes with living among “new-caught, sullen peoples, / Half-devil and half-child” (Kipling) is “the judgment of [his] peers” (Kipling). However, unlike Kipling, Orwell’s peers are the subjugated people that exist around him, not contemporary white citizens of white nations, who are obviously smarter and more reasonable than the “yellow faced” (Orwell) brutes he has to deal with. Orwell is more concerned about the understandably rampant “anti-European feeling” (Orwell) he recognizes in Moulmein, Burma, where he is stationed as a police officer. Thus, both…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays