Journal Article Analysis Essay

Journal Article Analysis

University of Phoenix

Journal Article Analysis This essay is grounded on the beliefs from Schommer-Aikens & Hutter’s (2002) article that originates evidence on the psychology of how a sample of participants could think about controversial issues through their epistemological beliefs. Kuhn’s (1996), on the other hand a post-positivist theorist, underlying philosophical assumptions based on the beliefs relates to Schommer-Aikens & Hutter’s (2002) article. Explanations of the real-world importance of the assumptions and their consequence of the researcher’s relevancy are included. The assumptions and research method, containing the points of view specified by Kuhn (1996), and Perry are contained in this essay . Schommer-Aikens & Hutter’s (2002) deliberates the methodology using a pair of surveys from the Schommer Epistemological Questionnaire (Schommer, 1990). The outcome of the examination of the participant’s answers from this questionnaire is exhibiting their beliefs as well thought-out by the surveys and sample articles starting with the slightest controversy to the greatest (Schommer-Aikens & Hutter, 2002). The essay confers the difference of opinion between the uses of epistemological beliefs when searching for
13) that involves scoring of the participants in to such a degree that empowers dependable data. The “Scoring Survey Protocols” (Schommer-Aikens & Hutter, 2002, p. 13) technique originates the most obvious information from the participants. Using “Predicting Thinking Dispositions” (Schommer-Aikens & Hutter, 2002, p. 15) is obvious and this technique uses epistemological beliefs that occur in the contentious subjects from the survey. The means and standard deviance of contentious subjects goes through assessment to estimate the