The Tragedy of Julius Caesar depicts the rise and fall of great leaders whose character traits can be seen as strengths but also as their biggest weaknesses. This play by William Shakespeare is about the tragedy of Julius Caesar but it is also the tragedy of Brutus. Brutus shows his battle between his friendship with Caesar and the greater good of the Romans through the internal conflicts his has with himself.
Brutus’ most prevalent downfalls within the play are his honor and idealism. From the beginning of the play Brutus has an internal conflict with giving his support to Caesar as king because he is a friend and believing that he is not what is best for the Romans ( Act 1 : Scene 2: Lines 83- 89). Brutus’ friendship with Caesar comes into play with Brutus’ choices and in some instances is used as an excuse for Brutus to not lose his principles while others try to persuade him into undergoing in dishonorable tasks.
The loyalty Brutus has for his fellow Romans outweighed that for his friend Caesar. When the forged letter from Roman citizens arrives Brutus is forced into finally making a decision about which direction he will choose. (Act 2: Scene 1: Lines 44- 58) This scene shows how easily persuaded and manipulated Brutus was because he had no thoughts on where the letter came from but took it as a personal calling for him to get rid of Caesar for the good of the Roman people. The extreme case of Brutus’ idealism is shown and brought forth through this scene. Even after Brutus has joined the conspirator’s side his honor and friendship to Caesar still influence his decisions (Act 2: Scene 1: Lines 163- 184). Brutus makes the fatal error of not wanting to kill Mark Antony along with Caesar and his honor and naïve idealism get in the way of tactical decision making.
Brutus’ attitude begins to take a turn as the assassination of Caesar is underway. After the assassination (Act 3: Scene 1: Lines 104- 111) Brutus feels confident that the public will understand the reasons behind the death of Caesar and his idealism again comes into play with his belief that allowing Antony permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral will strengthen the image of the conspirators. Woodrow Wilson was a person in history whose idealism was in the forefront of all of his decisions. Wilson’s actions, ideas were guided by his morals and principles. Unlike Brutus, Wilson’s idealism was not his downfall but in turn it was what made him great. Though Woodrow Wilson had opponents that felt instead of focusing on idealistic things he should focus on strategic plans. Through Wilson’s idealism he tried to bring about freedom, justice and peace to the world. ("Woodrow Wilson - Biography". Nobelprize.org. 1 Mar 2013 http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1919/wilson-bio.html)
Brutus’ tragic flaw was his idealism. Throughout the play his idealism led him to make unfit choices which later were his downfall. In the end Brutus believed he was doing what was best for the greater good of Rome. Brutus tried to see the best in every situation which led him to make poor decisions but through it all he tried to lead with his morals and principles. Even at death Brutus was still the noblest Roman of them all.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Any choice that involves choosing either a friend or the greater good is a tricky one, to say the least. Making the best of it and taking the nobler path is what Brutus does in this situation, opting to sacrifice Caesar in return for the prolonged survival of the Roman Republic. While his ingenuousness is the reason behind his downfall, Brutus’ inner turmoil and his respectability…
- 831 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus’s rigid idealism is both his greatest virtue and his most deadly flaw. In the world of the play, where self-serving ambition seems to dominate all other motivations, Brutus lives up to Antony’s elegiac description of him as “the noblest of Romans.” However, his commitment to principle repeatedly leads him to make mistakes that cost him much: wanting to curtail violence, he ignores Cassius’s suggestion that the conspirators kill Antony as well as Caesar. In another moment of rampant idealism, he again ignores Cassius’s advice and allows Antony to speak a funeral oration over Caesar’s body. As a result, Brutus forfeits the authority of having the last word on the murder and thus allows Antony to incite the shocked Roman crowd to riot against Brutus and the other conspirators. This is similar to when Regina George incites the entire school into chaos using the “burn book.” Brutus later endangers his good relationship with Cassius by self-righteously condemning what he sees as…
- 525 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
is in a sense the dominating figure in the story, but Brutus is the hero” (Paolucci, “The tragic hero”). Shakespeare meant for Brutus to be the hero of the story. He is a tragic hero by Aristotle's definition. He was good because of his care for the city of Rome. His tragic flaw which led to the death of his best friend; he was too trusting toward people. His tragic realization was at the end of the play, which was when he had to flee the city and go into war leading to the death of him and the conspirators. The audience also felt the emotions such as pity and fear for Brutus, which is another one of Aristotle's rules. Pity because Brutus only followed along with the plan of killing Caesar because Cassius tricked him. Fear because what if a close friend turned on one of the people in the audience, such as Brutus…
- 896 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Incidentally, Brutus ends up at the conspirator’s house discussing how they are to kill Caesar. He makes many decisions here that hurt him later the first being that when Cassius wants them to take an oath of secrecy Brutus rejects that idea saying “What need we any spur but our own cause, to prick us to redress?” Artemidorus tries to give Caesar a list of the conspirators but Caesar fails to read it. The second mistake made at that house was the decision to not recruit Cecilia. He was a great speaker whose words could have swayed the crowd in the conspirators favor. Finally the last mistake made here was to not kill Antony. Brutus believes that "Antony is know your outward favor.” When Cassius says this Brutus begins to reconsider his standing with Caesar and slowly is convinced that Caesar being dead is for the good of Rome.…
- 1192 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus remarks to Cassius “What means this shouting? I do fear the people choose Caesar for their king. I would not Cassius, yet I love him so well” (Act 1, Scene 2, Line 78-79 and 82) Cassius entices Brutus to take the throne of Caesar, but Brutus maintain his loyalty to Ceasar Brutus’ realtionship with the Roman citizens is stronger than his relationship with Caesar. Brutus…
- 276 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…
- 987 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus’s tragic flaw is that he is altogether too trusting. He genuinely thought that the other men were killing Caesar for the good of the people but now is seeing that they were lying, “Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?” (1158)…
- 335 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus was one of the most important and influential characters in the play. He involved himself in many of the scandals entailing the conspirators, in hopes of fulfilling his duty as an honorable man. However, his impressionable personality would lead him to a fatal outcome, suicide. There were many different causes and factors that led to his death, along with the death of the other central characters. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar resulted in multiple tragedies, due to the actions and decisions made by Brutus and the other conspirators. Realistically, Brutus’ own decisions led to his death.…
- 1134 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus is continuously making bad decisions, the biggest of which is letting Mark Antony live; "...For Mark Antony, think not of him; for he can do no more than Caesar's arm when…
- 747 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus is a tragic hero that did the wrong thing for the right reasons. His love for Rome and good intentions caused him to murder Caesar for the good of his country, which evidently caused his own death. His fatal flaw of patriotism was the difference between life or death, and caused his downfall from…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
He misjudged Antony’s loyalty to Caesar and to Rome, calling him “but a limb of Caesar,” (Act II. Sc. I). Because of his altered perception in judgment, Brutus thought that every leader in Rome was as noble as him, acting for the good of the republic, which wasn’t entirely the case. Brutus was easily convinced that Mark Antony had joined the conspirators’ side after the death of Caesar and was unable to see through his false promises. Brutus never thought that the death of Caesar would provoke such a reaction from Antony because he assumed that every politician in Rome held clear distinctions between their private and public lives, concerning their duties in…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although, Brutus was a man that was more associated with honor than he was with anything else, He was still a humane person who knew the difference in good and bad or the right and wrong. However, recently he had been through a lot of internal conflicts and he couldn’t tell the difference between those four things anymore. He had probably wanted to seek revenge and anything that was presented to him, he had…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…
- 464 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus is a patriotic middle aged man, who truly cares about the well being of his fellow people. “I do fear, the people, Choose Caesar for their king,” says Brutus. (Act 1 scene 2, 80) Despite Brutus’ friendship with Caesar, he much rather prefers Rome to remain a republic. He puts the masses before his own friendship. Brutus in return, is seen as trustworthy and reliable by the people. Indeed, Brutus is a noble man. Brutus says, “For let the gods so speed me as I love, the name of honor more than I fear death.” (act 1 scene 2, 90) He values honesty, fairness and balance. He is willing to lay his own life for what he believes. He is passionate and will do as much as what is needed so that what he believes is right will shine through. Brutus is easily swayed by Cassius in Act 1 scene 2. “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?” says the sly Cassius. (Act 2 scene 2, 140) After Cassius’ speech, Brutus considers the proposition of plotting against Caesar and does not shun the idea at all. Brutus is so willing to believe in his worthiness and Cassius’ call for action. He fails to truly listen to the Romans because he is too engrossed in doing what he believes is best for them.…
- 380 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
What if you were the only one that had to bear pain like no other out of your whole city? Would you be able to do it or would you crumble under the pressure? Well this is what the main character, Jonas, in Lois Lowry’s The Giver, faces every day. The Committee in Jonas’s community decided that taking away choices and feelings would create a utopia to live in. This made everyone in the community the same which helped to provide a more peaceful world. Even though the book begins with what seems to be the perfect place to live, it turns out that the people in the community are just going through the motions of life. As Jonas begins his assignment as the Receiver of Memories, he learns that in protecting the community from the memories, they do not have real feelings. In my opinion, Jonas’s assignment as Receiver of Memories is ultimately a punishment because he has to receive very painful memories plus he can’t relate to anyone in the community and he can’t tell anyone else about it.…
- 1029 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays