Preview

Julius Caesar Essay: Effective Leaders In Modern Days

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Essay: Effective Leaders In Modern Days
Effective Leaders in Modern Days
Is Mark Antony an ineffective leader or an effective leader when he manipulates the crowd ? In the book Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar is given the crown to be the leader of Rome after his triumph. After Brutus slaughtered Caesar, Mark Antony turned out to be more flattery where he organized the crowd to go and revenge against the conspirators; Brutus and Cassius for the murder of Caesar in Caesar’s funeral where it was placed by Brutus. Through logos and pathos, Mark Antony is uncovered to be an effective leader, albeit many believed that he is an ineffective leader due to his manipulative acts.

First, Mark Antony reveals to be a pleasure-loving and loyal to Caesar at the beginning of the book; however, he shows to be decent speaker that can persuade people to follow him like how he’s in Caesar’s funeral. At the end of the funeral, numerous Romans took after Antony’s concept of revenging the
…show more content…
Nevertheless, not all of the Romans follow his order and that he is evil when he manipulates the crowd, which is not an action for a leader who is fighting for justice. Through Mark Antony’s speech on act 3, scene 2, he said “If you have tears, prepare to shed them now” (3.2.181) and “Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed” (3.2.188). Both part of Antony’s speech is revealing to be the manipulating, like how he says “prepare to shed them now” he is implying the tears for the death of Caesar, and that they should start a fight for justice immediately, and that he did also imply the one who they should kill when he ended with “well-beloved Brutus stabbed” he is using dramatic irony as if Caesar has only experiences Brutus’s love but the reality is that he’s silently emphasizing the one who they should kill in order to make a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the assassination of Caesar, Brutus explains his reasons for committing such an act. Antony deceives Brutus into believing that Antony understood their reasons and would join them as an ally. By becoming a supposed ally, Antony gains the advantage of trust, as Brutus trusts him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony goes against Brutus’ trust, and reveals Caesar’s will, and incites the plebeians to come to the conclusion that Caesar had been a good man, and that Brutus was in the wrong. Antony reveals his true intentions when he says to himself, “Mischief thou art afoot; / Take thou what course thou wilt” (III. iii. 275-276). Antony had taken advantage of the trust bestowed upon him by pulling off a brilliant act on his part, that effectively persuaded Brutus. Not only that, Antony also takes advantage of the trust that the plebeians had given him. His ulterior motives are revealed when he criticizes Lepidus’ ability to stand besides them and asks, “Is it fit, / The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it?” (IV. i. 15-17). This shows how Antony has no intention of fulfilling his promise made to the plebeians to uphold Caesar’s will. Instead, he wants to gain power for himself, and gets rid of Brutus and the other conspirators to get his way. He had acted as a perfect friend/ally to the plebeians as he acted to Brutus, and he also took advantage of them as well.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony speech was more effective because he reminded the plebeians that Julius Caesar was not ambitious due to that fact he rejected the crown three times. Brutus tells the plebeians the reasoning behind why he were to kill Caesar - that if he were not to kill Caesar, then everyone would die as slaves. Then he said “But, as he was ambitious, I slew him. “(III,ii, 28). In other words, Brutus says the reasoning behind why he killed Caesar was due to the fact that Caesar was ambitious. However, when Mark Antony…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar played an important role for Ancient Rome. Julius was a Roman statesmen who lead the Roman Republic to spread around and rise Ancient Rome. He did so many differences to the city of Rome when he became dictator, and most of the people loved his acts and his good leadership. Julius gave the people 5 different types of reforms, which the people were happy to have an considered him as a great leader. During Julius Caesar's lifetime, he had held just about every important title in the Roman Republic including consul tribune of the people, and including a high commander of the army. He suggested new laws the improve the city of Rome, most of them were approved by the Senate to make them into official laws. He reorganized the army…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli once stated,“He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.” This seems simple, but some don’t understand, including most in the play Julius Caesar. Mark Antony, one of the few who understands how to command, is a loyal friend who is gifted with the ability to use rhetorics, and is able to appeal to people’s hearts. While Brutus uses force and facts, Antony is able to lift others up while conspiring against them. It is a skill that comes into play later in the tragedy when Caesar is killed Antony takes it into his own hands to get even with the conspirators. By being able to command respect Antony is able to turn the throng of citizens against Cassius, Brutus, and the others. This is why Mark Antony…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In both Animal Farm by George Orwell and The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, having an ambitious leader leads to many consequences. The word ambition means to have or show a strong desire and determination to succeed. Leaders such as Julius Caesar, Marc Antony, and Napoleon have ambition that makes them seem prepared for anything. This makes the people and animals follow them blindly believing they are helping the cause but in reality, they’re only helping their leader. Being ambitious can be both helpful and harmful but the consequences can be fatal.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of Leadership puts ecverything written about in shadow. Leadership is the most significant idea a leader can ever think about. Being popular doesn’t necersarrly mean that you are a leader. Being aple to represent propaganda to manipulate the community doesn’t represent a leader aswell. Very few ideas have something in common with leadership, that is 23hy it is so abstract, so different from everything else, and that’s why it is the most difficult thing for a pearson to achieve. As mentioned above being a leader sets every idea of manipulation in shadow. It is the door to a new era, and that is what Julius cesar achieved. He achived full control through leadership. That is the pricve of being a leader. The price is absolute control, but inorder to get to this idea of absolute control you will need to develop a society…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Leadership

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A dictionary definition of a leader is a guiding hand in a movement or group. My definition of a leader is someone who stands out amongst the rest and steps up to the task and helps the “followers” advance and strive to become a leader as well. The only way a leader can be effective is by leading by example. A prime example of this is Malala Yousafzai. She was shot in the face for trying to go to school. If she hadn’t gone to school she wouldn’t have been shot, but she also wouldn’t have a Nobel Peace prize. She is now using her story to speak for access to education for everyone. A leader is someone who leads by example and uses their skills to help others succeed.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech during Caesar's funeral, Mark Antony tries to persuade the Plebeians that what the conspirators did to Caesar was not acceptable and something must be done, and this creates a critical and disappointed tone. During the beginning of Antony’s speech, he established his main ideas, and showed that he was different from Brutus. In fact, his first line, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears”(3.2.82) tells a lot. Antony uses the word “friends” first, and this differs from Brutus because he said “Romans” first. This shows what Antony thinks is most important, which is friendship.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He leads himself as a heartbroken man toward Caesar and tell people what they already know. He use his tear to convince people that he has lost his dear friend and beloved friend and that Caesar loved Rome to the bottom of his heart. He once says “And men have lost their reason and I must pause till it comes back to me,” In a second, Antony tried to control his feeling by stop his speech for a second. Meanwhile, the people started whisperering “Poor soul! His eyes are red as fire with weeping.” His emotion actually effect to the people and it make people willing to hear him speak. “To wrong the dead, to wrong myself and you/ Than I will wrong such honorable men.” He also using the parallelism and repetition for this quote to show that he rather say all the terrible things about himself then telling all the terrible things about an “honorable” men. This parallelism is to repeat the points that Antony will never say such a terrible thing to the “honorable” man. At this point, Antony also uses the word “wrong” to reflected back in their minds that the word “wrong” does not fit for Antony but it’s being taken to describe Brutus as a “honorable” man who murdered Caesar Antony’s beloved and a respectful friend. Antony does not wish to speak all the dishonorable words that against Brutus, he speaks the truth and hope that people will believe in…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony was a Roman citizen, who was good friends with Julius Caesar. When the conspirators killed Julius Caesar, Mark Antony was very angry. Though he pretended to be their friend, he truly revolted against the conspirators by becoming motivated. By being provoked, he had also motivated the crowd to rebel against the conspirators. Mark Antony had many causes for rebelling against the conspirators who assassinated Julius Caesar. These motivations led to a battle between Mark Antony, Octavius Caesar, Brutus, and Cassius. His main motivation was vengeance. One last drive for spurring up the crowd to attack the conspirators was that he was extremely loyal to his friend, Julius Caesar. He cared and loved Julius Caesar. He called him one of the noblest mans that ever lived. Shakespeare created this character using drives that sparked from the murdering of Julius Caesar. He makes an understanding that revenge can be a type of motivation that causes things to happen because of events that have happened in the past. This human characteristic is natural and appears commonly in our world. Shakespeare also probably tried to show that revenge could drive oneself into a more deathly path than a safe one. By utilizing motivations, which satisfy one's need, Shakespeare was able to grasp the reader or…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays