Preview

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos
Ethos, Logos, and Pathos are the three tools that have been used to persuade any individual, and throughout Julius Caesar you tend to see towards the end Brutus and Antony using these tools to pursued the crowd of people. While Brutus used ethos, logos, and pathos to try and justify his reasoning for killing Caesar, Antony used them to get the citizens in an uproar and avenge Caesar’s death. Logos is used to persuade by using logic, Ethos’s appeal is based on the character of whoever is speaking or being spoken of, and Pathos is used by appealing to your emotions. At the end of the play you see Brutus and Antony become very good at persuasive speaking by making the citizens believe them and in turn making them choose who’s side they would be …show more content…
In Julius Caesar Marc Antony’s speech used many rhetorical devices but the one he mainly used was logos. He appealed to logic and reasoning to persuade the citizens that the fall of Caesar was not just. During Antony’s speech he starts by building up Caesars character by saying “I come to speak in Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” (3, 2, #85-86) right here Antony is showing what a great friend that Caesar was to him and is trying to show his admiration for his friend to try and get the citizens feel the same way about him. Antony always points out another flaw in Brutus’s statement when he said that Caesar was ambitious by saying “You all did see on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice refuse. Was this ambition? yet Brutus says he was ambitious and Brutus is an honorable man.” Antony once again contradicts Brutus, he does this in an innocent way but it’s still very effective in a way to where it takes away Brutus’s credibility, not only that but its once again showing Caesar’s true character that the conspirators were trying to besmudge. Brutus in his speech says “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men.” (3, 2, #23-24) this part of his speech was very powerful because it left the citizens to ponder if this would have really happened leaving the citizens to sway …show more content…
While each of them used the same rhetorical devices such as logos which is used to persuade by using logic, Ethos’s appeal is based on the character of whoever is speaking or being spoken of, and Pathos is used by appealing to your emotions. Even though Brutus and Antony each used these devices to persuade the people of Rome overall Antony’s speech was better because of the way he captured the heart and minds of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses all three of the persuasive appeals to convince people to one side of an argument or another. However, the most common appeal used by Antony is logos. This can be seen when he talks at Julius Caesar’s funeral, when he convinces Brutus and Cassius not to kill him after Caesar’s death, and when he asks if anyone else would leave their estate to the Romans like Caesar did.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Cassius’ speech, he used the persuasive appeals logos, pathos, and ethos to try to turn Brutus against Caesar. Out of all three appeals, I believe he used ethos best. In Act 1, Scene 2, one of the first things Cassius says when he is alone with Brutus is, “Well honour is the subject of my story.” In other words, Cassius is saying, “Brutus, you can trust me because I am a very trustworthy person.” This persuades Brutus into listening to what Cassius has to say because it makes him feel as if he can trust in what Cassius is saying. Then, as Cassius continues to talk he says, “I, as Aneas, our great ancestor, did from the flames of Troy upon his shoulder the old Anchises bear, so from the waves of Tiber did I the tired Caesar.” Here,…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society, we often look to those in authority for guidance or clarification in times of darkness and distress. In these situations, we look to the most righteous and trustworthy of them all to be our candles in the darkness. Julius Caesar was murdered because a collection of conspirators assumed that he may in the future abuse his power. The conspirators were Cassius, Metellus, Ligarius, Cinna, Casca, Trebonius, and Brutus, Caesar's close friend. People who are used to being public speakers, such as public leaders are able to sway their audience in any direction they want with the assistance of logos, pathos, ethos. Antony and Brutus were equally honorable and well-respected, but after comparing the two funeral speeches , there’s no debate that Antony had the most effective speech because his excellent range of logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony uses ethos to show how well he knows Caesar and how Brutus should not be trusted. At the beginning of his speech, Antony gives his credentials by saying how Caesar “was [his] friend, faithful and just to [him]” (III, ii, 87). This quote from Antony’s speech demonstrates the persuasive tool of Ethos because he is saying how he knows Caesar personally and is a very good friend of his. This…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By bringing up elements of Roman history and true events involving Caesar, Brutus seeks to demonstrate that the assassination was a planned (Antony knew nothing about the assassination) action based on thought and facts. Antony, too, employs logos when he lists examples of Caesar's actions on behalf of all Roman citizens. Therefore, his willingness to share the spoils of war with the people and his establishing a reputation for Rome throughout the known world; even Brutus could not the truth in Antony's words. The will itself is also an example of logos. While Antony uses, the literal will to stir up the crowd's emotions, the contents of the will represent logical support for Antony's defense of…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” a group of conspirators plot to kill the ambitious Caesar. Their plot is successful and Caesar is murdered in the Capitol while his right-hand man, Mark Antony, flees. Antony returns and asks the conspirators if he can speak to the public about Caesar’s death. Brutus grants Antony’s request, but on the requirement that Brutus gives a speech first. Brutus uses Ethos to make the Romans believe he’s one of them, Logos to give reason for killing Caesar, and Pathos to show he did love Caesar. Meanwhile Antony uses Ethos the same as Brutus, to convince the people he’s one of them, Logos to show Caesar wasn't ambitious, and Pathos to portray his true liking for Caesar.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although much of Mark Antony’s speech presents a plethora of pathos, he uses logos very well to justify how Caesar was a good man because when presented with the crown “he did thrice refuse.”(Act III Scene 2) Antony is confused that Brutus would say he was ambitious for power when Caesar refused to be crowned the king of Rome three times. The logic behind someone who refuses the crown to one of the most powerful empires of all time is that they are not thirsty for power or ambitious, as otherwise…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos is a form of establishing your credibility to other. Brutus’s use of Ethos far surpasses Antony’s because of how he reminds the crowd how honorable he is and how much more honor he has than Antony. Brutus states, “believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may believe” (3.2.2-4). This is proves that Brutus compared to Antony has better ethos while Antony’s ethos is “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he thrice refuse; was this ambition” (3.2.24-25). This is stating that Caesar thrice denies the crown but the reason he had done this was to seem less ambitious no matter how ambitious he was which he was very ambitious to be the king of rome. This example of ethos is inferior to Brutus’s because the way Antony uses his form of ethos is to show that Caesar did not deserve this connecting to Caesar more than the people of rome. While Brutus’s statements have personal connections to the crowd way more than Antony’s because of how his example is something that could happen to the them more than just one person. Ethos is a major key on connecting with this crowd by establishing credibility and how Brutus demonstrates his connections show better ethos than…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the opposite, Antony camp up. His speech was aimed to turn the public in his favor. He was restricted by many things but he didn't let that set him down. He mocked Brutus in kind words. He slowly turned the public against the conspirators. He took himself off of a pedestal and stood with the people, showing them that he wasn’t any better than them at this time. HE uses emotional rhetorical question to get to their hearts which starts the fire against the conspirators. After he was sure that he had them eating from his hand he brought out his "last card which is Caesars’ will. They pleaded and begged to hear it but Antony use the will against…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays