William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar has a strong focus on the response that various characters display to power and glory, and how and why this response may vary between them. Shakespeare shows contrast in response to superiority heavily throughout the text, and explains that people's retaliation to it will always differ. Where focus for some, lies in the attainment and holding of power, others prefer a view of conserving Rome's traditional government system. Contrast is seen strongly in character's views of Caesar's death, and also in their opinions of the preceding events and Caesar's gain of power. Despite these differing factors, all characters are portrayed to have some kind of lust for power, and intention to gain authority over citizens. These qualities are seen most strongly across the protagonists of the story: Caesar, Brutus, Cassius and Antony.
Throughout the text, characters claim to oppose Caesar's rule for the pure reason of conserving the traditions of Rome's government and heritage, but some developments strongly suggest the ulterior motive of desire for power. The idea of "[Rome's] wide walk [encompassing] but only one man" is daunting to Cassius, and he particularly portrays this throughout the play, joined by Brutus, claiming that the assassination of Caesar brings them "peace, freedom and liberty". However, opposing this, Cassius states that he "was born as free as Caesar" and thus is equally deserving of power, implying envy or resent toward the omnipotence Caesar achieves. Brutus stands by his intention, emphatically signifying his part with the conspirators was "not that [he] loved Caesar less, but that [he] loved Rome more". Brutus feels as though Caesar's leadership would negatively impact Rome and the good that Roman citizens have achieved. In contrast, Caesar and Antony both claim that Caesar's rule would be positive for Rome. Antony, as a strong supporter, stands by Caesar and claims that Caesar does have love for Rome, and would never have put the fate of Rome in danger. Although he states this verbally much later in the play, this is seen through Antony presenting the crown to Caesar upon his return to Rome from defeating Pompey. Caesar himself believes that he is worthy to rule Rome, and wants to gain the trust and support of the Roman citizens. He begins to do this by rejecting the crown when offered it, knowing that many people would be unhappy with the acceptance of the crown, and the subsequent ending of the Republic, however it is evident that his intentions may change. When told to attend the Senate as the crown is going to be offered to him again, Caesar eagerly takes this opportunity, implying his desire. Although he is "for the good of Rome", he still has intention to go against the system of government in place for omnipotence.
Upon Caesar's assassination, the opinions of many characters is shown to vary strongly, and this becomes increasingly evident as the text continues. Antony instantly ridicules the reasoning of the assassination, saying that he was not "ambitious" in the sense of gaining supremacy, as he was "thrice presented...a kingly crown" and "he did thrice refuse", posing his said "ambition" to be questionable. This is a sign of his tranquility toward power and those who have acquired it, contrasting with Cassius, who feels it is unruly for Caesar to "bestride the narrow world" as the sole leader of Rome, and sees that this is fair reason for Caesar's assassination. Cassius here appears to have desire for power, and to use Toward the conclusion of the text, upon taking their own lives, both Cassius and Brutus formally verbalise their views of their intentions in Caesar's assassination, but they also have differing responses to what they have done. While Brutus seems to show regret over killing Caesar, Cassius seems bitter about Caesar's death, with the claim that Caesar was "revenged" by Cassius' suicide, as if to entitle him with the blame for his death. Brutus seems regretful, as he states that Caesar was killed "with half so good a will" than himself, saying that he is more deserving of death, and bidding Caesar to "be still" in his death. The protagonists' views on the assassination drive forward the strong ambition they show to attain power themselves, and their feelings toward those who are in power.
Opinions of Caesar's success are heavily contrasted between the story's protagonists to emphasise how they see glory and fame, particularly comparing Antony and Cassius. Their views oppose each other, with Antony strongly supporting the success and rise of Caesar, where Brutus claims that Romans "as underlings" should be striving to go against Caesar's reign, and change the way Caesar is leading. Antony focuses strongly on Caesar's leadership as a positive part of Rome's society, and the love Caesar displays to the people. He signifies this by "thrice [presenting Caesar] a kingly crown", and telling the people of Rome of Caesar's great feats. Although the main contrast lies here, both Brutus and Caesar himself have their own opinions, both of which somewhat contrast with the views of Antony and Cassius. Brutus responds to Caesar's reign by questioning Caesar's character, and pondering the idea that Caesar's crowning "might change his nature", implying that he may become a worse person because of it. Caesar himself has a positive response to his gain of power, but soon it seems as though power soon goes to his head, and he begins to make rash decisions that regard the people of Rome more harshly. Each protagonist has a different approach to Caesar's reign, and each character responds to his rise in their own individual manner.
The segregation of opinions in regards to power and glory is contrasted in itself by each character's shared desire for power. This element of the text is seen at some times more strongly than others, as characters portray their emotions through private and public thoughts differently, and express more in what they think privately. Cassius, although seemingly "for the good of Rome" is described by Caesar to "[have] a mean and hungry look", implying that he has desire for power, which is also seen through the implication of his bitterness and envy of Caesar when he claims that he was "born as free as [him]". Brutus is probably the least power hungry of characters, although he still does desire power and fortune, as he claims he "would not have it so" with Caesar a ruler, yet he still "[loves] him well". Antony seems to want the attention and respect of people in the assembly of Roman citizens more than legitimate power over them, and uses his public speaking and persuasive skills to achieve this, with his repetition of the phrase: "Brutus is an honourable man" to condescend and degrade him. Caesar is the most power hungry of them all, although does not seem it in his rejection of the crown. He wants "men about [him] who are fat" in the sense of knowledge, and content with the power they have, as he does not want anyone stealing his power from him. Each protagonist shares this lust for glory and prestige, and each in a sense gains some triumph throughout the text.
Although there is a shared desire to obtain and hold power, the characters Shakespeare portrays in Julius Caesar depict the differing responses that many characters can have to the power they have, or the power those around them have emphatically. They may share some aspects of their reactions, or portray it in a similar sense, but overall, the characters views and opinions vary heavily throughout the text. Each aspect of the response characters have is seen in all four, but in each it opposes, as seen through the choices and reflections that characters portray.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The string that unravelled the drawback begins in the first scene of the second act where the naïve Brutus is swayed by Cassius and joins the conspiracy. The plot against Caesar is first devised by Cassius, who slowly allows Brutus to take over the arrangements. This is when Brutus’ oversights eventually lead him to his own demise. The question of whether or not to kill Antony is brought up amongst the conspirators, Brutus and Cassius disagree on the answer. Brutus does not see the threat in Antony, his naivety leads him to believe that everyone is noble and has good intentions in mind. He doesn't think people can be someone other than what they seem. This is shown with his strong opinion of Antony, "And for Mark Antony, think not of him; For he can do no more than Caesar's arm When Caesar's head is off." (Act II, Scene i, Line 181-183) This opinion is very far from the truth as is proven in the emotional speech Antony makes following Caesar's death. Cassius, on the other hand, was very much less trusting; he believed it would be best to kill Antony so that there would be no fear of retaliation from him. As a character, Cassius was usually suspicious of others and cautious to act for he was the first to declare Antony will bring the downfall of the conspirators saying, "A shrewd contriver; and you know his means, If he improve them, may well stretch so far As to annoy us all." (Act II, Scene i, Line159-161) He is also against letting Antony speak at Caesar's funeral before the citizens of Rome. His scepticism in Antony, but failure to act accordingly, turns out to be a key influence to the play's outc Brutus’ decision not to kill Antony at the time may have been honourable but it was unwise in the…
- 1058 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…
- 154 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…
- 1643 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…
- 913 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus’s rigid idealism is both his greatest virtue and his most deadly flaw. In the world of the play, where self-serving ambition seems to dominate all other motivations, Brutus lives up to Antony’s elegiac description of him as “the noblest of Romans.” However, his commitment to principle repeatedly leads him to make mistakes that cost him much: wanting to curtail violence, he ignores Cassius’s suggestion that the conspirators kill Antony as well as Caesar. In another moment of rampant idealism, he again ignores Cassius’s advice and allows Antony to speak a funeral oration over Caesar’s body. As a result, Brutus forfeits the authority of having the last word on the murder and thus allows Antony to incite the shocked Roman crowd to riot against Brutus and the other conspirators. This is similar to when Regina George incites the entire school into chaos using the “burn book.” Brutus later endangers his good relationship with Cassius by self-righteously condemning what he sees as…
- 525 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marc Antony and Cassius are very manipulative, while Brutus is quite the opposite. Brutus’ naïve idealism leads to trouble when Cassius deceives him. Cassius’ sly nature is most evident when he says, “Where many of the best respect in Rome, except immortal Caesar, speaking of Brutus, and groaning underneath this age's yoke, have wish'd that noble Brutus had his eyes.” Cassius states that Brutus is unable to see what everyone else does, namely, that Brutus is widely respected. He goes on and says that the Roman people wished that Brutus, not Caesar, would be their ruler. A few more persuasive acts on Cassius’ part eventually leads to Brutus joining a conspiracy to murder his good friend. Marc Antony is also manipulative in nature. With fake tears on his cheeks and Caesar’s will in his hand, Antony uses his skilled rhetoric in Caesar’s funeral oration to stir the crowd to revolt against the conspirators.…
- 642 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play Julius Caesar by Will Shakespeare, Cassius and Antony were shown as two different leaders in the way of their skills in persuasion, whether they were easily swayed, and how trustworthy they were; though they both have faults, Antony is the superior of the two.…
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Brutus’s genuine heart causes him to make the decisions he does throughout the play. Brutus was not originally for killing Caesar, as Caesar was a dear friend and close ally to him. After some distressed letters from the “people of Rome” arrive at Brutus’ study, he decides that he has “no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general.” (II.i.11-12) He decides that because the people of Rome feared Caesar’s rise to power, he must do something to stop it from occurring. His distinction and genuine intentions cause him to look out for the people's’ best interest. Later on, when Brutus is conversing with the fellow conspirators, Cassius suggests the murder of Mark Antony as well. Brutus rejects this idea, saying “Antony is but a limb of Caesar” and “Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius.”(II.i.178-179) Brutus explains that Antony will be nothing without Caesar to ease Cassius’s perspective, but also killing Antony will turn their noble cause into a murder spree. Brutus, unlike Cassius and the others, sincerely believes that he is helping with Caesar’s murder for the people’s good. Therefore, Brutus was a true and honorable roman up until his death, as Antony states in his…
- 521 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…
- 987 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus may have said that his actions were for the good of all of Rome, but even a villain can backup his motifs. “Brutus: If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (Act 3: Scene II: Lines 20-24). During the end of the play, Mark Antony, the leader of the opposing army and Caesar's friend, admitted Brutus as being the Noblest Roman of them all: “Antony: This was the noblest Roman of them all. All the conspirators save only he Did that they did in envy of great Caesar; He only, in a general honest thought and common good to all, made one of them.” (Act V: Scene 5: Lines 68-72). Brutus did believe that his actions were for the good of the people and what he was doing was for the good, but that was where he strayed off of the path of justice.…
- 745 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Roman history, some elite men held certain values that they felt strong enough to take their life in order to defend it. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, there are certain characters portrayed to show how a person’s values or ideas can change their behavior and influence some significant decisions. The protagonist of the play, Marcus Brutus, supports this thought by having an idealistic view on the world and by showing his patriotism toward Rome. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus as an honorable, idealistic man in order to show the depth that a high-class Roman man will go through in order to defend his honor.…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It is true Marcus Brutus had a close relationship with Julius Caesar, it is also true that he cared and served for Rome. Brutus used this credit and honor to persuade the plebeians; he said “believe me for my honour, and have respect to mine honour...” Brutus then uses both a rhetorical device and a hyperbole to over exaggerate what he believed would have happened if Caesar was not murdered. “Had you rather Caesar living and die all slaves, than that Caesar dead, to live all free men”; Brutus is implying if Caesar was not killed and instead was to go on and be crowned as king, the people would fundamentally be treated as slaves. This accusation supports Brutus’ previous statement on line 23 stating: “… not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”. Brutus uses the juxtaposition of multiple contrasting ideas to rationalize Caesar’s murder: “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him, but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus claims Caesar’s ambition to be the reason of the conspirator’s act of murder. Marcus Brutus believes and persuades the crowd into thinking that the murder of Julius Caesar was for the greater good of Rome.…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus being the one who supports the government thinks Rome would be better off if Caesar was dead. Brutus fears the fact that Caesar is in the position of dictatorship. Cassius the talented general hates the fact that everyone in Rome sees Caesar as godlike. Cassius soon tries to lead Brutus to believe Caesar must be dead.…
- 387 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Brutus and the conspirators kills Julius Caesar for abusing his power as an emperor. During Julius Caesar's funeral, Brutus faces an outraged mob of Roman citizens loyal to Caesar. Brutus reasons with them in his speech by explaining that he killed Caesar because he loved Rome more than Caesar, and Caesar had abused his power by being extremely ambitious. Brutus then asks the crowd to speak out if any was offended by what he has done to Caesar by questioning their loyalty to Rome. As a result, the Romans fully support Brutus and rejects Caesar as an ambitious emperor who considered power over duty to Rome. Brutus concludes his speech by giving Anthony, a beloved soldier and friend of Caesar, permission to honor and speak about Caesar for his funeral speech, expecting Anthony to speak in favor of Brutus. However, Mark Antony uses a clever progression in his speech to achieve his sole purpose; to arouse a mutiny against Brutus and gain back the Romans love for Caesar.…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays