Preview

Juror # 3 In 12 Angry Men

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juror # 3 In 12 Angry Men
Sidney Lumet is the director of 12 Angry Men and it was released in 1957. It is about a jury who must decide the outcome of a murder case committed by a 16 year old boy. They all become very angry and slowly everyone goes from choosing guilty to not guilty. Throughout the movie the jurors true characters are revealed and they learn about the past of each other. The movie, 12 Angry Men, uses juror #3 to illustrate the emotions of everyone in the room by showing his stubbornness, extreme anger, and his personal struggles throughout the movie. Stubbornness can make you very closed minded and blur your judgement even when it may be obvious. Juror #3 says “Well, you’re not getting through to me.” after juror #8 makes a very valid point. He has already made up his mind and nothing can change it even if he is wrong. When you are part of a jury you should be open to everyone's opinions, but he was stubborn and would not change his vote, no matter what the evidence was. Later, he states “There are people in here who are so goddamned stubborn that you can’t even… We’ll never get this thing done.” Juror #3 thinks everyone else is …show more content…
During the arguments, The third juror turns to face the 5th juror in a fighting manner and later yells “You bet I’m excitable.” When someone says something juror #3 doesn’t like, he gets very angry and immediately raises his voice. This attitude immediately makes his point invalid to many of the other jurors. The eighth juror says some words to anger the third juror and it works with the third juror saying “Shut up!” lunging wildly at the eighth juror and screaming “I’ll kill him! I’ll kill him!” Juror #8 baits the third juror into getting very angry and everyone realizes that they maybe shouldn’t believe everything the third juror says. He makes some credible points, but when he starts to overreact the jurors don’t want to side with him

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Juror #8 displayed this ability throughout the entire movie. He always had a persuasive but yet argumentative approach to the deliberations. His relevant use of his perspective to others is what gave him the ability to sway others to his direction.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men is a very successful literary work even without everything that makes a good play. There are 12 main characters whose names are never said, stuck in a single room discussing the life of a man the reader knows nothing about. There is still a large amount of character development, which allows us to learn a lot about the jurors. Even though the trial is not in the play, the reader is able to figure out all the key points from it. While the entire play takes place in one room, the author is able to transform that room and allow all the necessary actions for the play to occur.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the number of people who think the defendant is guilty starts to dwindle, he chooses to use derogatory phrases such as “bleedin’ hearts” to try and persuade people to change their votes. He prefers to use brute force and voiced anger instead of logos to influence people. Although juror #3 frequently contradicts his argument, he dismisses it refuses to admit his…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others (1). Therefore, during the developing of the voting, Juror Three try to force people to admit his prejudice continuously. If people do not agree his view and vote for not guilty, he is angry and interrupt other Jurors’ discussion. Even though other jurors support appropriate assumption and evidence to prove the murder is not guilty, Juror Three do not believe and keep his prejudice which has logical fallacies. For example, when Juror Nine change his vote in the second voting for not guilty, and want to explain the reason why he change his mind, Juror Three answers, “No, we wouldn’t like to know why”(12). When Juror Eight try to measure how long the old man can walk in 15 minutes, and walk as slowly as the old man who uses canes. However, Juror Three says, “You made it sound like a long walk. It’s not,” (19) and when Juror Eleven thinks Juror Eight’s behavior can be an important point. Juror Three declares, “It’s a ridiculous waste of time”…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rose wrote several spin offs of the story. In 1964, Leo Genn appeared in the play on the London stage. In other theatrical adaptations in which female actors are cast, the play is retitled 12 Angry…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With a wide cast of characters, it is truly courtroom television. Almost the entire movie is filmed entirely in the jury's deliberation room. At the beginning of 12 Angry Men(http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050083/), the characters have just heard the testimony and evidence against a man accused of murder. The case initially seems to be obviously against the defendant, and 11 out of 12 jurors agree that he is guilty. One juror remains who is not entirely convinced that the man is guilty of murder. Over the course of the film, this individual gradually swings more and more of the jury to his side of the argument.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Everyone dreads Jury duty. Jury duty is commonly known as a nuisance that gets in the way of our everyday lives. When one types in the words “jury duty” into the google search bar that individual finds the first few search results to be “get out of jury duty” or “jury duty excuses”. However, we fail to realize that the role of a juror is essential to the United States justice system, we also fail to realize that every single juror counts. We often hear of jurors conforming, and switching their votes to the majority vote in hopes of going home, but this is not the case in “12 Angry Men”. In Sidney Lumet’s feature film “12 Angry Men”, we are given insight to the pressures of social psychology and how one man strives to overcome and change it.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In 12 Angry Men

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It’s the hottest day of the year in New York City, and 12 clammy men, who were put on a jury, are locked into a room, where the fan doesn’t work and the windows stick, to discuss the case of an 18 year old accused of murder. In the opening scene, the judge states that is it a first degree murder and if found guilty the teenager will receive the death penalty. The 18 year old is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade. The 12 jurors must decide if there is enough evidence to convict the teen of murder. When the initial vote is taken it is 11-1. The one vote for not guilty is juror eight, whose real name is Davis. He is a well-spoken man, wore a suit and tie and had his dark hair slicked back for the trial. Davis admits that he doesn’t know if the teen is innocent but says he could be. In the movie 12 Angry Men, Juror eight shows true justice…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juror 10

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juror 10 is an impatient and uncaring/unconcerned person. It is made clear by viewing his lines that Juror 10 does not take his part on the jury seriously and only wants to reach a consensus as quickly as possible. His reason is quickly found on page 22 when he states, “I got three garages of mine going to pot while your talking. Let’s get done and get outa here.” On page 34 he impatiently asks, “What’s the idea of wasting everybody’s time here?” Clearly he just wants to get back to his garages; he…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His emotional prejudice gets in the way of his critically thinking through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son. He is grouping all teens together because of his altercation with his son, and Juror 3 is just punishing the young man on trial because he cannot come to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all alone on the vote count; he “looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them despise him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist down on the table” … (thundering) All right” (30).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Jurors is a play full of emotion, and during the play we are able to watch 12 ordinary people become enraged with anger and compassion. I had a unique opportunity to be one of those 12 angry jurors, and let me say that the emotional and physical toll it took for me to stay in character the whole time was astounding. This ensemble cast portrays this piece very well, every character sitting in the jury room for the whole duration of 12 Angry Jurors took skill. I now know the power of peer pressure, throughout this play we have jurors number three and eight fighting, juror three for guilty and juror 8 for not guilty, trying to get other on their side.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis 6

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jurors number three, the messenger service owner, and number ten, the garage owner tried to use the assertiveness method of influence to get their points across. They were screaming and berating at multiple points during the film. It was very clear that they were not going to change their minds. As I was watching the movie, I often wondered how the other jurors are going to get these two men, especially, to switch their allegiance from the guilty verdict. They were so strong-minded and basically tried to fight the other jurors into believing that the kid is guilty. It turned out that these two men had personal motives for their assertive methods of influence. I will discuss these motives in a later paragraph.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Behavior

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The behavior and attitudes throughout the entire movie from all the jurors show that it can be hard for everyone to keep calm and civil in a time such as the one the juror’s were going through. The twelve jurors all had different beliefs as to their verdict, different ideas and different behaviors. Having twelve men in a small, hot room for long periods of time is chaos in itself. There were different attitudes, some calm, mad, frustrated, angry, not caring. It was hard for all of them to remain calm and come to a verdict throughout the movie. An attitude as described in the book is “a favorable or unfavorable evaluative reaction towards something or someone (Myers p.120).” In the movie juror number eight was the only one that believed the…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics