Preview

Justice In 12 Angry Men

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice In 12 Angry Men
It’s the hottest day of the year in New York City, and 12 clammy men, who were put on a jury, are locked into a room, where the fan doesn’t work and the windows stick, to discuss the case of an 18 year old accused of murder. In the opening scene, the judge states that is it a first degree murder and if found guilty the teenager will receive the death penalty. The 18 year old is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade. The 12 jurors must decide if there is enough evidence to convict the teen of murder. When the initial vote is taken it is 11-1. The one vote for not guilty is juror eight, whose real name is Davis. He is a well-spoken man, wore a suit and tie and had his dark hair slicked back for the trial. Davis admits that he doesn’t know if the teen is innocent but says he could be. In the movie 12 Angry Men, Juror eight shows true justice …show more content…
He first bring up the “one of a kind” switch blade that killed the father; Davis pulls out the exact same switch blade that he found at a store only a few blocks away from where the crime took place. The 11 other jurors were shocked that he had that and gasped in amazement and even stood up to examine it up close. When talking about the time it would have taken the old man to walk from his bed to the door, 12 feet, then down the hall to the front door another 43 feet, and a bad leg had to have taken longer than 15 seconds. Davis sets up chairs around the room about how long each walk would be and has juror 2, time him while he walks around acting like he is the old man at home. The time ends up being 41 seconds exact, showing that the old man could not have gotten to the door in time to see the teen leaving the house. As Davis is proving his point, he sweats

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a murder trial conducted in a courtroom. The judge gave the jury its final instruction telling them that a guilty verdict will result in a death sentence for the defendant, an 18-year-old boy who was accused of murdering his father using a knife! One juror had a personal connection with the case. He has not seen his son for more than two years. He claims that the young boy is guilty and that all young kids are criminals. The juror has bias towards the trial because he see his son in the young boy. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven jurors voted for conviction. Another juror states that he has doubts about the case and hopes to give the boy a favorable decision. The young boy had a hard life living in the slum. A third juror claims that each of the…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A final piece of evidence comes from the murder weapon, which the boy admits he bought; the prosecution states that the switch knife is incredibly unique and is not sold in any of the nearby areas. However, a juror is able to find an identical knife sold in the same area, which once again proves there is a reasonable doubt in the case. Throughout the play it is made apparent that the defense for the boy was lacking, and they did not strike many of the necessary possible jurors during voir dire. For instance, Juror 10 is a complete bigot who believes anyone who comes from a poor area, like the boy, is not trustworthy. In the play the jurors unanimously decide on a not guilty verdict based on the untrustworthy evidence. After their hours of careful discussion, it is clear that their decision was not made hastily, which once again shows that the lacking defense led to the appearance of guilt. In this fictional case, many jurors pushed for a hung jury, however, ultimately it was decided that evidence made possibility for reasonable doubt, and delivered a not guilty…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the conception of Twelve Angry Men, Rose exposes the audience to the devastating heat in the jury room which over looks the "New York sky line" on what is described as "the hottest day of the the year". At this stage it is revealed to the audience the apathetic nature of jury members, uninterested in the "grave responsibility" they have in deciding the fate of the "16 year old boys life" and more interested with the goal of escaping the plain, oven like jury room. With each juror being blinded by the thick glaze of heat In front of them a verdict of guilty becomes the instinctive state of mind and the room for reasonable doubt is eliminated from all but one. The author, Reginald Rose displays through juror 8 that to be doubtful when challenging a majority becomes a harder state of mind, "as it's not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of other" at this moment juror 8 initiates his campaign that we can never be certain about anything, we can only make assumptions based on the information provided.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ’12 Angry Men suggests that there is a difference between justice and truth’. Do you agree?…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At one point of the movie he and Juror 8 were arguing back and forth he says, “Brother, I've seen all kinds of dishonesty in my day, but this little display takes the cake. Y'all come in here with your hearts bleedin' all over the floor about slum kids and injustice; you listen to some fairy tales... Suddenly, you start gettin' through to some of these old ladies. Well, you're not getting through to me, I've had enough. ”and then Juror 3 stood up and threatened Juror 8 by saying, “I'll kill him! I'll - kill…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following report will go into detail about the movie 12 angry men and how the current Jury system operates. It will list all the key turning points, and incorporate how the movie can be portrayed into the real life struggles of the current jury system.…

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crucible

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All the Jurors presume the obvious guilt of the defendant, whom we learn has been accused of killing his father. Eventually, the twelve sit down and a vote is taken. All of the Jurors vote “guilty” except for one who votes “not guilty”, which forces them to discuss the case. The Jurors react against the vote. They decide to go around the table explaining why they believe the boy to be guilty, in hopes to convince the person who voted “not guilty”.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Response

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The setting of 12 Angry Men is a jury deliberation room where the jurors are and required to decide the guilt or innocence of an 18 year old that is accused of committing first-degree murder by stabbing his father with a switchblade knife. Witnesses were presented to give evidence of hearing a quarrel; hearing a threat to kill, and have seeing the boy run away. Another witness swore to having seen the boy stabbing his father from a window across from where the murder occurred. Eleven jurors were convinced the boy was guilty and deserved the death penalty. One raised questions he felt had not been asked or had not been pursued by the defense.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The group initially started with a process of arriving at a decision by voting and there was a groupthink causing everyone (apart from juror 8) to vote guilty. Then a secret ballot was carried out and it was decided that the jury would debate for at least an hour before deciding on the fate of the boy. The first turning point in the jury's decision-making process occurs when Juror 8 dramatically produces a switchblade exactly like the murder weapon, thus disproving the prosecution's argument that the murder weapon was unique in design, Juror 8 had walked through the defendant's neighborhood earlier that week and had bought the knife from a local pawnshop, even though he knew it was against the law to purchase a switchblade. Juror 8 thus causes a few jurors to question the strength of the prosecution's case; his illegal purchase of the switchblade enables him to break the force of the majority's resistance to his viewpoint.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play, 12 Angry Men, there are 12 jurors in a jury room. All of them are completely different, coming from various occupations and backgrounds. Juror #5 stood out among them because of a few things. He was from a very different background than the others. He grew up in the slums, just like the teenager being tried in the case. Because of this, he would take offense to the rude things the other jurors said about people from the slums. This contributed a lot to him changing his vote later in the story. He was relatively quiet but was not afraid to voice his opinion; however, he would often lose arguments. He appeared to be a person who took a bad situation and turned it around; as he is quite civilized and did not act like one from such a bad neighborhood.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Plot of 12 Angry Men

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The plot of 12 Angry Men revolves around the murder trail of a Latino boy who is accused of killing his father. The conviction of the boy would mean a death sentence and the destiny of the boy's life is in the hands of twelve male jurors of ranging personalities. The case seems open and shut with a murder weapon and several witnesses to place the boy at the scene of the crime. For eleven of the jurors the decision is apparent that the boy is guilty but for one juror, Mr. Davis (Henry Fonda), the boy's life should entail some discussion to eliminate any reasonable doubt the jurors may have. As the film progresses the personalities of the jurors become apparent and many underlying issues influence the guilty decision chosen by the majority of the jurors.

The underlying issues are the complexity of the personalities of the jurors and the reasons why they have the motivation to feel and act the way they do. As the case unfolds further, more is learned about each juror individually. The personalities range from being a short-tempered loud mouth to a straight- laced accountant who never breaks a sweat. As the movie progresses much more is learned of the characters that exposes the intricacy of human nature and people's different personality traits.

This film is an excellent example of movie making that does not require elaborate sets to entertain the viewer. The majority of the film takes place in a jury room with the men never leaving the room from their deliberation responsibilities. The cast and dialogue make this film memorable and the film has some clear moral issues that are addressed. The main issue is that not everything is as it seems. With further analysis the understanding of a situation becomes more concrete enabling the men to make a solid decision that affects a young man's life. 12 Angry Men is a classic film that should not be missed.…

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The film twelve angry men is a quaint film which takes us into a jury chamber during the deliberation faze. Juror # 8 (Harry Fonda) is the only juror out of the twelve who believes that the case they are deciding is not open and shut. His argument was that it was not the defendants that had to prove innocence but the prosecution which had to prove guilt which he did not feel was done.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men was a very good movie to me and it had a message behind it all. The message I understood was that you should always think the options and never judge too quick. This movie was very old and can somewhat relate to what still goes on these days in the same situation. If I was one of the jurors, I feel as if I would've been like Davis and not close the case so quickly. Davis was a thinker and he didn't want them to just rush their decision when a young boys life is in hand. The 18 year old boy has a bad record and he grew up in a bad neighborhood with no mother and an abusive father. Therefore it is understandable that they would assume he was guilty because of the evidence provided. But deciding to send a boy to the electric chair for his life should've been taken as a serious thing to Davis. In the beginning of the trial, the vote was 11:1 guilty. Davis, the one who thinks the boy is nor guilty or innocent just wants to think of the options. He ends up coming up with a reason to backfire on the reason the boy should be guilty. The jury for courts are supposed to be “peers” of the person on trial, this was not the case in this situation. The jury consisted of a ranged age of intelligent white males. The boy on trial was a young minority being tried as an adult. In the beginning of the decision making everyone thought he was guilty but Davis just didn't know if that was correct because everyone felt TOO sure of him being guilty. If I was on the jury, after sitting through the trial in the courtroom I'm sure I would feel as he was guilty, but I would also take in hand that the boy's life is at risk for my decision. I would try and do anything to think of reasons just like Davis. To be apart of a jury you seem like you must be able to think over everything carefully and notice things not said. This jury was full of different personalities. The “Angriest” man was the #4 juror, he started…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ek Ruka Hua Faisla

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was the 12th Juror, who did not agree to this decision. He declared that he did not imply that the accused was innocent. His only argument was that one cannot simply jump to any conclusion without examining all the data and assess the truth. He justified that a person’s life was at stake and jurors should discuss all the factors associated with the case. He was interrupted by most of the jurors as some of them were in a hurry. Almost everybody had some excuse or other for going home or elsewhere. How the jurors arrived at the final decision after volatile interactions is what the movie is about.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics