Preview

Juror Seven In Twelve Angry Men

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
252 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juror Seven In Twelve Angry Men
There are many individuals in “Twelve Angry men”, but the most important is Juror Nine because he is wise and respectful. The play “Twelve Angry Men” by Sherman L. Sergel adapted from the show written by Reginald Rose. The main people of the play are the twelve jurors and other characters are the guard, the defendant, the man and the woman. The jurors all have differing personalities and backgrounds that affect the case’s turn out. Most of the jurors take the case very seriously and make their desicions slowly na dcarefully. Yet, Juror Three is forceful and opinionated, and pushes his views on others which creates arguements between the men. Juror Seven has a short temper and makes decisions quickly. Juror Eight wants justice served and was
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview
    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay
    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay

    The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate. Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.” Only one juror votes “not guilty.” That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty.”…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Character Development In Juror's Twelve Angry Men
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Character Development In Juror's Twelve Angry Men

    There are only twelve main characters in the entire play whose names we never learn. Despite that fact, there is a large amount of character development and the reader is able to learn lots about each juror. Character development is necessary for a good story and Twelve Angry Men has lots of it. It is all through the jurors dialogue and how they each act. The protagonist, juror 8, and the antagonist, juror 3, are easily identifiable thanks to how they talk about the case and what they want to happen. Juror 10 is clearly a racist based on the way he talks about “them”. As you can see, their names are not necessary for good characters and a good play. All that is…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    Also juror number 1 had some character flaws too. Juror number 1 was the foreman and he was very relaxed and lacks intelligences, but most importantly he is very obedient. In the description of jurors for one says “Not overly bright”(The script) When the jurors go to the jury room and after everyone's gets settled in and down, he says “I’m not going to make any rules,” which sounds like he does not really care and relaxed (The script). Juror 1 gets talked over a lot and not taken serious by the others jurors, which makes him obedient to majority of the group. Well as juror number 3 is way different than juror number 1, he lacks moral courage, sadists and very opinionated. In his description it says that he is “extremely opinionated and detected a streak of sadism”(The script). Some things he say such as: “ We don’t need sermon” to juor 9, way he talks about his own kid “Rotten kid,” after juor 9 explains about the old man eyewitness and “Well, that’s the most fantastic story I’ve ever heard” (The script). Juror 3 is really rude and making his own feelings on what happen to his own son's relationship get away from the real…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Homicide Trial
    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men: Homicide Trial

    The play concerns the deliberations of the jury of a homicide trial. At the beginning, they have a nearly unanimous decision of guilty, with a single dissenter of not guilty, who throughout the play sews a seed of reasonable doubt. This was first made as a 1954 teleplay by Reginald Rose for the Studio One anthology television series, and aired as a live CBS Television production on the September 20th 1954. The drama was later rewritten for the stage in 1955 under the same title.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial System In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Judicial System In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    Just by reading the play, we, the readers, understand that despite the evidence that may be presented or the setting and state of being a person might find themselves in, factors such as prejudice and individuality or conformity will somehow end up leading to mob mentality and/or a strong emotional bias. No matter how hard one may try to avoid the inevitable, they will never be fully successful in doing…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Guilty In Twelve Angry Men
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Guilty In Twelve Angry Men

    In the play Twelve Angry Men, a teenaged boy is indicted of committing premeditated murder, the most serious felony tried in the United States justice system. While initially it appears the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, after careful deliberation from the jury, additional evidence surfaces, showing the boy may not be guilty. Additional evidence found led the jurors to impeach the witness’s accounts, due to inconstancies in their testimonies. For these reasons and others I believe the boy was not guilty. For example, one of the most convincing pieces of evidence from the prosecution is an eyewitness account from a woman who saw the boy murder his father from the windows of a passing el train. However, the jurors discover the women’s…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men Rose Shows That Doubt Is an Easier State of Mind Than Certainty
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Twelve Angry Men Rose Shows That Doubt Is an Easier State of Mind Than Certainty

    Set in the sweltering summer of 1954, Reginald Rose's socially insightful play "Twelve Angry Men", illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" decision with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the conception of the play, rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt, in the guilt of the boy, as a minority view within the courtroom. However, as the play progresses a seed of doubt is planted and the importance of self prejudice hindering the verdict is removed, making it harder for the jurors to hold their certainty in their guilty verdict.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Does 12 Angry Men Show Prejudice Obscures the Truth?
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Does 12 Angry Men Show Prejudice Obscures the Truth?

    The 3rd juror is at first shown as a man who is rational and a person who believes in the facts of the case, however it is soon revealed that he is very emotional and has preconceived notions on the trial and the defendant. Juror #3 prejudices comes from the fact that it is a case involving a young boy who is charged…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice Vs. Truth In Twelve Angry Men
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice Vs. Truth In Twelve Angry Men

    Jurors 9 and 11 are crucial in supporting juror 8’s quest for justice. Juror 8 is able to acknowledge that the real truth may never be known, but he would rather, if there was any doubt, see a guilty man live rather than an innocent man die. Juror 8’s calm, reasoned delivery of facts and his ability to refute some of the evidence means that other jurors start to realise that a fair verdict means letting go of their preconceived notions and prejudices about the defendant and his background, ‘No one can really know, but we have reasonable doubt, and this is a safeguard that has enormous value in our system’. Like juror 3, Juror 9 is able to view the defendant objectively without letting prejudice cloud his judgement, ‘I don’t think the kind of boy he is has anything to do with it’. Juror 11 takes a similar rational and sensible approach to the likes of jurors 8 and 9 establishing that he is ‘simply asking questions’ and that ‘we [meaning the jurors] have a responsibility’ to uphold, not abuse. Juror 3’s blinded focus on discovering the truth (manipulated by his predetermined ideas) restricts him from passing a fair verdict on the defendant. Juror 3’s overlook of the case is tarnished as he mirrors his broken relationship with his son to the defendants and…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English Comparison and Contrast Essay
    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    English Comparison and Contrast Essay

    Jurors Three and Eight, from the play “The 12 Angry Men”, have many differences, but they do have some similarities. Finding the differences between Jurors Three and Eight was fairly easy. Similarities were more difficult to find, but they were present. This paper will compare and contrast these two jurors…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty
    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    Everyone dreads Jury duty. Jury duty is commonly known as a nuisance that gets in the way of our everyday lives. When one types in the words “jury duty” into the google search bar that individual finds the first few search results to be “get out of jury duty” or “jury duty excuses”. However, we fail to realize that the role of a juror is essential to the United States justice system, we also fail to realize that every single juror counts. We often hear of jurors conforming, and switching their votes to the majority vote in hopes of going home, but this is not the case in “12 Angry Men”. In Sidney Lumet’s feature film “12 Angry Men”, we are given insight to the pressures of social psychology and how one man strives to overcome and change it.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men
    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men

    Roses play Twelve Angry Men is about a dissenting juror in a murder trial who slowly manages to convince the other jurors that the case they are examining is not as obviously clear as it seemed in court. The defence and the prosecution have rested and the jury is filling into the jury room to decide if a young sixteen year old boy of a minority race is guilty or innocent of murdering his father. It begins as an ‘open and shut’ case of murder, but soon becomes a mini drama of each of the jurors’ prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused, and each other, which every jury room tries to avoid. Prejudices’ and misconceptions are formed through personal experiences which influence human decision making, which is shown throughout the play from all jurors but is distinctively shown through Juror 3.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: Parts
    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Parts

    Throughout the deliberation, Juror number 3 used intimidation to make his point. He acted as a bully in attempting to push around other jurors. Juror number 8 tries to include everyone in the group and show them that they have a voice. His strategy is more successful. Number 8 is open to anyone persons input and listens to everyone’s point of view. Number 3 is very close-minded.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics